← Home

~10 min read

Is the board trying?

DRAFT. Generated from 331 primary-source catalog entries drawn from Select Board and School Committee minutes, FY19 to present. Companion page: What have we tried?

The catalog contains 331 entries spanning Select Board and School Committee meetings from January 2019 through February 2026, covering fiscal topics from structural deficit planning to collective bargaining. The record shows frequent, often substantive engagement on budget mechanics, capital facilities, and special education costs, with importance ratings concentrated at 3 (policy-adjacent) and 4 (substantive), and a smaller set of landmark 5-rated actions tied to the Bell School debt exclusion and the FY23 override cycle. Attempt types include formal votes, warrant articles, studies, proposals, and working groups; most proposals were discussed without a vote, while debt exclusions and collective bargaining MOAs were more frequently voted. The two bodies address overlapping fiscal pressures from different operational positions, with School Committee entries dominating special education and staffing topics and Select Board entries dominating town-wide revenue and governance items.

By topic

Structural deficit and reserves

This topic draws the largest share of catalog entries, with roughly 55 attempts across both bodies, predominantly at importance 3 or 4. Entries include forecasts, multi-year scenario directives, budget gap proposals, and one-time surplus maneuvers. The Town Administrator’s February 2021 presentation stated that “the Town’s historical reliance on free cash to support the operating budget is no longer sustainable” and that “difficult decisions will need to be made for FY22 and beyond” select_board 2021-02-12. In March 2024 the Select Board voted unanimously “that the Board identify the creation of a long-term financial plan for the town as a top priority moving forward after town meeting and that we direct our professional team to work on this” select_board 2024-03-29. By December 2025 the Select Board and Finance Committee discussed “projections showing a $7 million deficit next year that could grow to $15 million over three years due to factors like double-digit increases in healthcare and pensions, along with inflation” and agreed to prepare “both a state-required balanced budget and a contingent budget option for voters” select_board 2025-12-10. On the School side, the Assistant Superintendent presented an FY27 level service budget “approximately $2.7 million over current appropriation” with efficiencies reducing the gap to approximately $878,000 school_committee 2026-01-06.

Override and Proposition 2½

Roughly 25 entries address override or debt exclusion activity, weighted toward importance 3 and 4 with one 5-rated landmark. In May 2019 the Select Board voted unanimously to place on the June 18 special election ballot a debt exclusion for “the design, project management and construction, equipping and outfitting of a new Pre-K through Third Grade Elementary School with an approximate square footage of 81,935 square feet located at the Bell School site” select_board 2019-05-13. In March 2023 the School Committee voted 5-0 to approve an FY24 “level services budget in the amount of $45,971,790 which is contingent up a proposition 2 ½ override” alongside a reduced-services alternative school_committee 2023-03-27. In January 2025 the School Committee again voted 5-0 to place a warrant article to “supplement the school departments operating budget beginning in fiscal year 2026, contingent upon the passage of a proposition two and a half so called ballot question” school_committee 2025-01-09.

Capital facilities and debt

About 35 entries address capital facilities and debt, with importance ratings from 3 to 5. In March 2019 the Select Board voted unanimously to “enter into the Massachusetts School Building Authority Project Scope and Budget Agreement for the replacement of the Elbridge Gerry Elementary School, the L.H. Coffin School, and the Upper and Lower Malcolm L. Bell Schools with a new PK-3 elementary school facility” select_board 2019-03-18. In May 2025 the Select Board placed a Mary A. Alley Building debt exclusion on the annual election ballot covering “design, construction, repair, renovation, furnishing, and equipping of the Mary A. Alley Building, including windows, elevators and HVAC systems and acquiring and installing a new roof” select_board 2025-05-06. In November 2025 the School Committee voted 4-0 to award the MHS roof and HVAC general contract to Homer Contracting at $8,970,000, noting the bid came in “$2,120,000 under budget of $11,090,000” school_committee 2025-11-20.

Staffing and collective bargaining

About 25 entries address staffing and bargaining, mostly at importance 3 with several at 4. In May 2025 the Select Board approved multi-year contracts, including the Police Union MOA “for the period July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2028” with POST-compliance increases layered onto COLA select_board 2025-05-05. The School Committee’s September 2024 negotiations update stated that “The MEA wage proposals are ‘unaffordable and unsustainable’ and would result in increased staff layoffs,” with “A 39.5% increase … proposed by the MEA for Unit A Teachers and Nurses over a 3 year period” school_committee 2024-09-19. In November 2025 the Assistant Superintendent presented a staffing analysis modeling that “reducing first grade sections from five to four classes at one building would increase average class size from 18.8 to 23.5 students” school_committee 2025-11-17.

Special education and collaboratives

About 20 entries surface special education as a structural budget driver. In January 2019 the Select Board approved “a year end transfer, of $350,000, from the Town to the Schools to assist in addressing the FY19 budget deficit” driven in part by out-of-district placements select_board 2019-01-17, alongside engaging Powers and Sullivan “to conduct an investigation and audit” of FY18 special education bills paid in FY19 select_board 2019-01-17. In July 2023 the School Committee voted 4-1 to fund “a comprehensive audit of the special education department” school_committee 2023-07-06. In October 2025 the Committee reported a mid-year correction moving “$1.7 million in expenses moved from local budget to circuit breaker” after discovering tuition had been charged incorrectly school_committee 2025-10-30.

Revenue diversification

About 17 entries address revenue diversification. In May 2025 the Select Board adopted “the Home Rule Petition as approved at May 7, 2025, Town Meeting, Article 28: Establish Means-Tested Senior Citizen Property Tax Exemption” on a unanimous polled vote select_board 2025-05-14. In September 2021 the Select Board voted 3-2 to “authorize the Town Administrator and Town Counsel to enter into negotiations for a Community Host Agreement” with a cannabis retailer select_board 2021-09-08. In December 2025 the School Committee discussed that “User fees set at $500 per student with family cap; salaries increase 2-3.5% annually while fees have not been adjusted,” with the CFO cautioning “recurring salary expenses require recurring revenue, not fund balances” school_committee 2025-12-01.

Governance and organizational

About 17 entries address governance and organizational structure. In July 2025 the Select Board documented at its retreat that “the restructuring of the Finance Department to address longstanding issues, such as a lack of succession planning and operational redundancy” would add an Assistant Town Accountant and split the Assistant Treasurer/Collector role select_board 2025-07-18. In May 2025 the Town Charter Committee reported to the Select Board that it plans to present a draft “to Town Meeting in May 2026 for review by the voters” select_board 2025-05-14. In September 2019 the Select Board and School Committee approved a joint MOA “that provides increased collaboration, cooperation and long-term planning between the Board of Selectmen and the School Committee” select_board 2019-09-25.

Regionalization and shared services

Six entries address regionalization. In July 2025 the Select Board approved a “joint contract, approved by Swampscott the night before” for ambulance service through Beauport, which “will provide one fully staffed ALS ambulance and additional BLS coverage” select_board 2025-07-23. In May 2022 the Select Board consolidated DPW and Water & Sewer leadership under one director via an MOU with the Water & Sewer Commission select_board 2022-05-25. In February 2026 the School Committee discussed a joint project with Park and Recreation at the Eveleth site, including “Joint survey with Park and Recreation discussed to assess community interest and programmatic needs” school_committee 2026-02-13.

By era

FY19 to FY20 (approximately 15 entries). Early activity focused on the Bell School MSBA project, the FY19 special education deficit and Powers and Sullivan investigation, and initial FY21 budget framing. Importance ratings included two 5-rated landmark votes, the MSBA scope agreement select_board 2019-03-18 and the Bell School debt exclusion select_board 2019-05-13. Budget discussions were predominantly operational and project-specific rather than framed around a multi-year structural gap.

FY21 to FY23 (approximately 70 entries). Volume increased notably, with the COVID period generating both one-time funding decisions (ARPA allocations across several votes) and the first explicit Town Administrator warning that free cash reliance was “no longer sustainable” select_board 2021-02-12. Importance ratings shifted upward, with the FY24 override cycle producing multiple 4- and 5-rated entries, including the School Committee’s 5-0 vote to approve an override-contingent level services budget of $45,971,790 school_committee 2023-03-27 and its reduced services alternative eliminating 33 positions school_committee 2023-03-21. The override failed at the June 2023 ballot, triggering further School Committee action including a 4-0 vote to fund a comprehensive special education audit school_committee 2023-07-06.

FY24 to present (approximately 130 entries). Volume and importance both rose further. The Select Board formally prioritized long-term financial planning select_board 2024-03-29, engaged an independent override/restructuring specialist select_board 2024-12-11, and, by December 2025, was discussing a projected $7M to $15M multi-year deficit and dual budget scenarios select_board 2025-12-10. The School Committee moved its override warrant article vote forward to January 8 to ensure adequate time before the January 23 warrant closing school_committee 2025-11-17. Capital activity also intensified, with debt exclusions placed on the 2025 ballot for the Mary A. Alley Building and High School roof/HVAC, and the $8.97M MHS roof contract awarded in November 2025 school_committee 2025-11-20.

By body

The two bodies show complementary rather than identical patterns. The Select Board’s engagement concentrates on town-wide revenue mechanisms (meals tax outreach, cannabis host agreements, senior tax exemption Home Rule Petition), multi-town shared services (ambulance, DPW/Water-Sewer consolidation), and structural governance actions (Charter Committee, Finance Department restructuring, CliftonLarsonAllen assessment implementation). Its budget work typically frames the town-wide picture, with FY27 deliberations citing projections and healthcare/pensions as cost drivers select_board 2025-12-10.

The School Committee’s engagement concentrates on the school operating budget, special education out-of-district costs, staffing and collective bargaining, and school capital projects (Gerry/Bell, Coffin disposition, Eveleth reuse, MHS roof/HVAC). Override-contingent budgets appear more frequently on the School Committee side, and special education entries are almost exclusively located there. Joint work exists, including the September 2019 MOA select_board 2019-09-25, the joint Select Board and Finance Committee session of December 2025 select_board 2025-12-10, and the proposed Eveleth Park and Recreation collaboration school_committee 2026-02-13. Both bodies treat FY27 as a focal decision point, with aligned timelines for balanced-budget and override-option presentations.

What the data does NOT show

The catalog is drawn from Select Board and School Committee minutes only. Finance Committee records were requested but are not yet available, meaning that Finance Committee deliberations, recommendations, and reserve-fund transfer reviews appear here only as referenced in Select Board or School Committee meetings. Where a Finance Committee vote is noted (for example, approval of the ClearGov transfer select_board 2022-11-16), the underlying Finance Committee discussion is not catalogued. Conclusions about Finance Committee engagement cannot be drawn from this dataset.

Topic coverage is uneven in ways that reflect what appears in minutes rather than what is fiscally material. The healthcare_gic topic has zero catalog entries despite health insurance being cited repeatedly as a cost driver, for example in the December 2025 reference to “double-digit increases in healthcare and pensions” select_board 2025-12-10 and in Finance Committee Chair commentary on the need for “a reserve in the budget, particularly for health insurance and utilities” select_board 2024-12-11. No entries document a GIC-specific policy attempt, plan-design review, or contribution-rate decision in the minutes reviewed. Absence of entries does not mean absence of underlying activity; it means minutes do not record a discrete, named attempt on this topic.

The pensions_opeb topic has three entries: the auditors’ recommendation to target additional OPEB funding select_board 2025-09-24, the April 2024 Select Board 4-1 vote to reduce the OPEB line by $250,000 to free funds for other appropriations select_board 2024-04-08, and the December 2025 framing of pensions as a deficit driver select_board 2025-12-10. Actuarial updates, Retirement Board proceedings, and OPEB trust activity are not captured here.

Minutes vary in completeness. Some entries reflect votes without recorded deliberation, while others reflect extended discussion without a vote. Verbatim quotes in the catalog have been verified against minutes where possible, but minutes themselves may summarize rather than transcribe.

Closing

Readers seeking the texture of specific attempts, including the proposals that were tabled, the motions that failed, and the warrant articles that were placeholders, should consult the linked entries directly. A companion page, “What have we tried?”, organizes these attempts by topic and outcome and is the recommended next step for readers building a timeline or comparing proposals across years. The catalog is a starting point for public inquiry, not a conclusion about it.