School Committee
School Committee: August 29, 2022
The School Committee met fully remotely and voted unanimously on several items including approval of all MPS school handbooks, appointment of Mary Talbot RN as Glover School nurse, and a schedule of bills totaling approximately $1,165,116.65. The committee also approved a PolyStudio X70 video conferencing kit and technologist stipend (~$9,000 combined) to support hybrid meetings, and authorized Marblehead Boosters to place sponsorship banners at Hopkins Field at Village School and the softball field at Vets. Superintendent Dr. Bucky reported a notable 9.1% district-wide enrollment increase over the summer, with kindergarten enrollment up 14.4% year-over-year.
District enrollment up 9.1% over summer; kindergarten alone up 14.4%
Superintendent Dr. Bucky reported enrollment increases at nearly every grade level, with outstanding openings primarily in paraprofessional and cafeteria positions.
Dr. Bucky provided an enrollment and staffing update, describing the summer hiring as productive with many positions filled internally — through Endicott fellows, tutors moving to teaching roles, and paraprofessionals advancing. Outstanding positions include:
| Position | Location |
|---|---|
| Special education teacher | Village School |
| English teacher | High school (offer pending) |
| Student services administrator / preschool coordinator | Glover School (temporarily filled) |
| Paraprofessional positions (lunch/recess) | Multiple buildings |
| Cafeteria workers | Multiple buildings |
| Custodians (3 offers extended) | District |
| Bus drivers (2 potential) | District |
Enrollment rose approximately 9.1% district-wide over the summer, with increases at every grade level except grade 4 (flat) and grade 10 (static). Kindergarten enrollment increased 14.4% year-over-year. Dr. Bucky noted this data will be important for future budget discussions, as prior budget cycles had assumed continued declining enrollment. He credited the new school buildings as a factor in attracting families.
Dr. Bucky (superintendent) · Sarah Fox (chair) · Mandy (Village School administrator, voice only)
Also on the agenda
School Committee approves all MPS handbooks after discussion on dress code consistency
Members voted unanimously to approve elementary, middle, and high school handbooks, with a committee member flagging inconsistent dress code enforcement across the district.
A committee member from the policy subcommittee opened the meeting noting efforts to streamline handbook policies and hot-link them to avoid 300-page documents. Discussion centered on dress code inconsistencies across grade levels and buildings, with members noting that enforcement — not the district’s broad policy — was the chief concern.
The initial motion covered only the elementary handbooks; a clarification revealed the middle and high school handbooks were also ready for approval. The committee amended the motion to cover all MPS handbooks and voted unanimously (4–0).
Sarah Fox (chair) · Emily Barron (committee member) · Allison Taylor (committee member) · Sarah Gold (policy subcommittee chair) · Dr. Bucky (superintendent)
Mary Talbot appointed as Glover Elementary School nurse, 4–0
The committee conducted a brief interview with Talbot, a Salem State graduate with hospital and prior school nursing experience, before voting unanimously to appoint her.
Superintendent Dr. Bucky introduced Mary Talbot, who appeared remotely from outside Columbia University where she was helping her daughter move into Barnard. Talbot described pediatric nursing experience at North Shore Evanston Hospital, a seven-month stint as a pandemic nurse in Raleigh, and prior service as a school nurse at Whitman Elementary (CCSD 21 in Illinois) and as the MASCO special education nurse for its summer program.
Committee members welcomed her and noted she had multiple competing offers from other districts. The committee voted 4–0 to appoint her as Glover Elementary School nurse.
Mary Talbot (Glover School nurse candidate) · Dr. Bucky (superintendent) · Sarah Fox (chair) · Allison Taylor (committee member) · Emily Barron (committee member) · Sarah Gold (committee member)
Policy subcommittee presents second reading of Title IX and related procedure updates
The committee reviewed rescissions and new procedures tied to federal Title IX changes, with a vote deferred to the following week's meeting.
Sarah Gold, chair of the policy subcommittee, introduced updates developed with district counsel (Matt McAvoy’s office). Dr. Bucky explained that some policies were being rescinded because they are no longer required following Title IX changes made a couple of years ago, and a new instructional materials reconsideration procedure (policy IJR) was being added at the librarians’ long-standing request.
Discussion items included:
- A requirement (per a 2019 OCR directive) that the district’s civil rights coordinators include one male and one female; the committee currently has two female coordinators and agreed to clarify with legal counsel.
- Section K of the Title IX procedure lists key personnel as ‘to be determined’; members suggested using job titles rather than individual names to reduce future amendments.
- The HR director’s potential role as a named coordinator was raised.
The administrative team had already completed a four-hour professional development session with district counsel on the Title IX changes. The committee noted this was the second reading; a vote is anticipated at the next meeting.
Sarah Gold (policy subcommittee chair) · Dr. Bucky (superintendent) · Emily Barron (committee member) · Allison Taylor (committee member)
Committee approves schedule of bills totaling approximately $1,165,116.65
The larger-than-usual bill schedule reflects summer accumulation at the start of the school year.
The chair noted that the first meeting of the school year typically carries a larger schedule of bills because they accumulate over the summer. The committee voted unanimously to approve bills totaling $1,165,116.65.
Sarah Fox (chair) · Sarah Gold (committee member) · Allison Taylor (committee member)
Committee votes 4–0 to purchase PolyStudio X70 video kit (~$5,600) and create $3,000 technologist stipend for hybrid meetings
Members debated the combined ~$9,000 cost before approving unanimously, citing community engagement and transparency as justifications.
The chair explained that the AV bar previously used for hybrid meetings had been borrowed from equipment purchased for the Brown School, which has since been installed there. The committee considered two items:
- PolyStudio X70 video conferencing kit and stand — quoted at approximately $5,600 (described as the best available price; higher online).
- Technologist stipend — approximately $3,000 annually, structured as either a flat fee or per-meeting rate, for a staff member to run the technology so committee members can focus on governance.
One member expressed hesitation about the combined ~$9,000 cost and questioned whether the money could be better spent elsewhere, and noted she had searched for grants without success. Supporters argued hybrid meetings significantly increase public attendance and community engagement, which they linked indirectly to future school funding support. The committee also discussed the possibility of the equipment being shared on a cart for school-day educational and community use (e.g., class presentations, concerts).
The motion passed unanimously (4–0).
Sarah Fox (chair) · Emily Barron (committee member) · Allison Taylor (committee member) · Sarah Gold (committee member)
Boosters authorized to place sponsorship banners at two additional athletic fields
Muffy Paquette and new VP Mandy Caruso presented; the committee unanimously approved expanding the existing sponsorship banner program to Hopkins Field at Village School and the Veterans softball field.
Marblehead Boosters president Muffy Paquette, joined by new VP Mandy Caruso, clarified that the banners display only donor company names — no email addresses, websites, or phone numbers — and therefore constitute sponsorship recognition rather than advertising. The program had been approved originally around 2019 for the high school football field at Piper.
Boosters sought approval to extend the program to:
- Hopkins Field at Village School
- Softball field at Veterans Middle School
Paquette also provided an update on the ‘Forever Fan Zone’ project: approximately $40,000 raised toward a $75,000 goal, with Boosters potentially able to float funds to begin construction this fall. The committee voted unanimously (4–0) to approve the expanded sponsorship banner placement.
Muffy Paquette (Marblehead Boosters president) · Mandy Caruso (Boosters VP) · Sarah Fox (chair) · Sarah Gold (committee member)
Chair previews next meeting agenda: COVID protocols, K–3 schedules, dual enrollment, community forums, and possible curriculum subcommittee
Members flagged parent concerns about K–3 schedule publication and discussed forming a curriculum subcommittee.
Closing items discussed for the next meeting agenda:
- COVID/health protocols: Members asked to review current district protocols alongside MASC recommendations ahead of a vote.
- K–3 schedules: Allison Taylor raised community concerns about when schedules would be published; the chair indicated Nan (likely the assistant superintendent for curriculum) would present schedule information at the next meeting.
- Dual enrollment: Dr. Bucky had already contacted Salem State to explore a dual enrollment program.
- Thought Exchange platform: Dr. Bucky contracted with the company to gather community feedback on forum topics; establishing community forums is an agenda item for the next meeting.
- Curriculum subcommittee: Sarah Gold reported preliminary research and meetings with Nan; she aims to bring a proposal to the next meeting.
- Two additional subcommittees: Dr. Bucky will present proposals for two more subcommittees at the next meeting.
Sarah Fox (chair) · Allison Taylor (committee member) · Sarah Gold (committee member) · Dr. Bucky (superintendent)
Tonight's record
6 decisions ▾
- Approved all MPS school handbooks (elementary, middle, and high school)
- Approved appointment of Mary Talbot RN as Glover Elementary School nurse
- Approved adoption/second reading of Title IX and related policy updates (vote deferred to next meeting)
- Approved schedule of bills totaling approximately $1,165,116.65
- Approved purchase of PolyStudio X70 video conferencing kit and stand, and stipend for technologist for school committee meetings
- Approved Marblehead Boosters to accept sponsorship and hang banners at Hopkins Field at Village School and the softball field at Veterans Middle School
5 votes ▾
- in favor (unanimous) Approve all MPS handbooks (elementary, middle, high school)
- in favor (4 to 0) Appoint Mary Talbot RN as Glover Elementary School nurse
- in favor (unanimous) Approve schedule of bills totaling ~$1,165,116.65
- in favor (unanimous) Approve PolyStudio X70 video conferencing kit, stand, and technologist stipend
- in favor (unanimous) Approve Marblehead Boosters sponsorship banners at Hopkins Field and Veterans softball field
61 min full transcript ▾
AI-generated · may contain errors · verify with the source video
Transcript captured from YouTube auto-captioning. No speaker labels; proper names and dollar figures occasionally misheard. Click any timecode to jump to that moment in the source video.
0:01 so really you know even if we stick with what is what we’ve got um you know i i’m glad that we’re having those conversations and i would just like to say i was having conversation again because policy i’ve been on the policy subcommittee now for a few years so i was having a conversation with lisa earlier today about streamlining streamlining the policies that are in those handbooks and i know i can only really speak to the high school level um because i was in that sac last year and i know some of the edits that were going on but i know some of the pieces within it were taking the policies out and hot linking them so that the handbooks don’t become you know 300 pages long because then they’re just tedious and when you actually need them they’re really hard to get through so but there’s got to be a better way so
0:48 that we’re not so our policies aren’t changing and if we you know we’ve got a couple that were being asked to rescind tonight so that those don’t stay in there and so just if you know dr bucky if when you’re meeting with the administration on this if you can sort of troubleshoot some of those ideas and if it needs to come back to the full committee or the subcommittee um that’s perfectly fine as well but just to kind of so that we’re not falling behind in the edits because it feels like we’re sort of on this treadmill right now where we make these really great substantive changes and and get things back up and running and then you know the committee continues to work and the district continues to run and then we’ve sort of got but then we fall behind a little bit and we’ve got outdated policies and and things that are kind of not quite
1:34 correct in our handbook so if we just can and you know maybe maybe it just is the nature of the beast but if you know as we’re doing some of this thought work if we can kind of point our direction at that at some point i think that that would be really helpful as well that’s a great point i think as we go through we really need to to make that concerted effort to make sure that we’re keeping our policies aligned and vice versa um so i have that motion to approve the changes to the elementary school handbooks as presented who moved second uh was that allison yep okay uh roll call emily baron can we have discussion about it real quick yes um so i sorry i just want to say that we are live on youtube and recording i think
2:20 it’s all working um in regards to the handbook i think we need to talk as a district in schools i know this isn’t a school committee issue per se but it is a policy about the dress codes in the handbooks are not consistent and i think over the next year we need to look at them more closely and kind of figure out how we’re going to deal with dress codes because i know it’s not something people want to talk about but it is something we are going to have to deal with now or in the future so i’d like to have that happen at some point and i think a piece of that is also not just creating the policy and or the handbook sections on that but
3:08 also having the discussion um which we would have with dr bucky and then he would take it you know with it through his principles and then they would take it to their teachers and how we’re enforcing these to make sure that they’re enforced equally throughout the district enforced equally you know at a grade level or um even in a classroom that every every student across the board is feeling that they’re they’re enforced equally because i think all of us have that’s the feedback we’ve heard it’s more in the enforcement piece not necessarily on um on the district policy because our district policy on this is very very broad it’s when we start to to align that down through the the various grade levels
3:56 okay okay is there anything else anybody wanted to talk about on this no okay um so i’ll roll pull on this emily baron yes allison taylor yes there gold yes and sarah foxes yes um that moves us to the appointment of school nurses yes were we not going to do the uh middle school and high school handbooks tonight so that they too are we we can do that for some reason i thought in our meeting meeting last week that um there had been a request to break that up those were the school improvement plans we’re going to do the school improvement plans and there you go so yeah because i see matt and dan
4:42 looking very terrified that their handbooks are not going to get approved this evening in my notes i had that we were breaking it up but apparently i noted the wrong thing there so we had the we had all of those handbooks in our dropbox and we had the one-page memos from all the principals so we i i’ve already had a chance to review that from um matt and dan as well and i’m perfectly happy to call for that approval for um to approve the marblehead veterans middle school as well as the marblehead high school handbook all right i guess we’ll amend that we’ll just amend that motion and retake the vote i need a motion to amend to approve all handbooks
5:34 anybody want to make that yeah i can make a motion to amend all of mps handbooks okay um and then a second second oh go ahead and wait oh yeah second okay um and again emily baron yes allison taylor yes sarah gold yes and sarah fox and i apologize for that um i’m gonna hand this off to dr bucky to present um our school nurse
6:09 yes um one of the charges of school committee is the pleasure of approving school nurses we’re very fortunate to have mary talbot join us this evening for the school committee interview of her becoming the glover school nurse mary had several offers from several different districts and were very pleased that she has considered the marblehead public schools and to become the glover school nurse so i will turn it over to the chair for any questions the committee may have i’ll open up to the rest of the committee if anybody has any specific questions for mary and i just want to welcome you mary to our meeting into our district
7:00 i think she looks like she’s coming back to us so if no one has any questions for mary i just had one brief one after reviewing your resume it looks like you’ve had you’ve worked as an rn in in various settings can you just for anybody tuning in briefly let us know what your pediatric clinical experience is um as highlighting your experience utilizing your assessment skills absolutely first i wanted to apologize um i’m in the process of moving my daughter into barnard and the apartment complex that she’s in is 110 years old and everyone in there seems to be about
7:45 95 so i was running around desperately searching for the wi-fi password so i’m in front of columbia right now sitting outside of starbucks i don’t typically do zoom calls this way with ambulances in the background and people walking by so my my sincere apologies i’m usually much more professional but i did want to attend the meeting um in terms of my clinical experience i’ve worked at two different hospitals one was north shore evanston hospital in evanston illinois working as a flow tech so i’ve basically worked emergency room er
8:23 pediatric i’ve worked everywhere but um but the surgical suite that’s a very specialized suite and then i just did a seven-month stint as a star spoke to pandemic nurse at wake mad out in raleigh so that was primarily pediatric and then prior to that i was a school nurse with ccsd 21 at whitman elementary and um that was a title one school i dealt with mostly pre-k through fifth graders um so my my pediatric background is very it’s varied and it’s um it basically goes along a spectrum with children that are basically i grew up in massachusetts i graduated from salem state um i just
9:09 here from illinois so my background is with children the demographic the particular population that’s very specific to barbel head um but in terms of pediatric i’ve worked with all different types of populations so um and then prior to accepting the position with marblehead i was the masco special education nurse for the summer program uh working with the medically fragile and autism spectrum chiari malformation all different types of situations involving mostly medical transfer children so i did that with masculine up in thank you very much for all the
9:56 information mary does anybody else have any questions sarah um not really any questions for you mary but um welcome and um you know best of luck as as we sort of onboard you here and as an illinois as a chicago native um you know i recognize many of the places on your resume so um it’s good to see and and you know it’s a as i can you know from what i know from growing up in that area you know um mary has been at some at some esteemed places so thank you thank you for the warm welcome i’m excited to join the team welcome allison yeah welcome mary of of course we’re super excited to have you i i just think it would be interesting to hear what made you want to make the shift
10:43 into the school systems i just think it’s always interesting to hear people’s paths and and why what interests them to make that shift from the hospital setting which obviously is dramatically different uh the hospital setting at this point is um is absolutely chaotic in terms of a lot of my sister-in-law the nurses are leaving the bedside which is unfortunate um so when they when they talk about a nurse shortage there’s not necessarily a nurse shortage there’s just basically attrition and departure of nurses such as myself um frankly to be honest with you i love working with children i have children they’re grown now they’re 24 and 20. my youngest um is uh is currently in new york and my oldest
11:29 is in arizona he’s a recently eas marine from from camp lejeune so working with children having children working as a school nurse is exactly where the subset the area that i want to work in i could work pretty much anywhere i wanted leahey clinic was talking to me about wound care working with skilled nursing facilities it just doesn’t interest me and i’m sort of at the age in my career where and god bless the nurses that do um cure salsas and whatnot um it’s uh it’s it’s a job that um with certain nurses i i think that there’s absolutely that’s their that’s their calling um but in terms of the pediatric uh
12:14 nursing i absolutely love it it’s it’s where i want to be and it’s where i um and my career so i started it as at whitman elementary in illinois and you know i probably have a good ten years left of uh nursing and um that’s why i’ll hold you to that thank you well welcome and thank your son for his service thank you um so emily did you have a quit any questions or are we ready um nope we’re ready and welcome um so i’m going to ask for a motion to appoint mary talbot rn as a school nurse at gulver elementary school so moved
12:59 um roll call emily barron yes allison taylor yes sarah gold yes and sarah fox yes that motion carries four to zero um that moves us to the review of health in adoption of procedures i’m going to hand this off to sarah gold who is the chair of the policy subcommittee to give us an overview so the policy subcommittee met last week um and i’m actually going to pretty quickly hand this over to dr bucky um to kind of fill us in um the the policies that are on the agenda most of them are are um
13:45 sent free from our lawyers as the handbooks were being gone over and then the federal changes to title ix so dr bucky i will um i will let you tee it up the rest of the way uh thank you um this is just really what uh sarah fox had said earlier in the meeting getting us back into compliance with policies that have shifted over time there were some major updates to title ix a couple years ago when former director of student services was here this is rescinding some policies that are no longer necessary because of those changes and procedures and i put together that one page kind of overview so i’ll just open it up to people if they have questions about what is being added what is being rescinded or what
14:31 this means but all of this did come through matt mcavoy’s office as did the handbooks i’ll just say one more thing on that sandwiched within the ac policies and title nine is the procedure for the policy i j r and that um i think we’ve talked about a few times the librarians came to the subcommittee last june i think it was and talked to us a bit about how they’ve been trying for um the better part of a decade to get a procedure in place with the reconsiderate reconsideration of instructional material um i think the policy is pretty good from what we’re understanding and so just putting in this procedure which so just tacking it on to the the existing policy is what we’re asking of the committee and what
15:17 they’re asking of the committee and so they’ve worked all summer with dr bucky as well as with the lawyers and so what you have in your packet is what they’ve come up with and again it went through the subcommittee last week so this is technically the second reading of it um and these are this this would be the second reading of um of all these policies i believe so i’ll open that up to emily and allison if they have any questions no okay um i very much so like how this outlines the procedure because i think some of our policies that’s what’s hard for the public is to understand okay this is the policy but how do i go what are the
16:03 steps that are proper to go through um i think even if we take in the future and we look at that policy ac and we really put down the procedure for that that people can clearly follow as well make that a little clearer for the public to find and to look for um one question under the title ix is in section m i believe in the past that ocr had instructed us to have one male and one female as our civil rights coordinator right now we have two females i don’t know if that’s something that we need to um to look at because i do believe maybe two or three years back sarah gold you may be the only committee member that also recalls that i believe that was if we weren’t instructed to always have email and an email so i don’t know if something has changed since then
16:49 since then since then actually think you’re right um and that we’ve what probably has changed is our is our legal representation um so i can go back i’ll look through um i think those those changes may have occurred when um megan was on the policy subcommittee so i can ask her to look through some of her things um and go and work with dr bucky and maybe that is the edit for that third read um is to name a male person because i do i do believe you’re right sarah if i if my memory serves me it was like october or november of 2019 and i believe the instruction came not from valerio but it came directly from ocr telling us that we had to have a male
17:35 and a female represented where i think this probably organically happened is at the time our male was our student services director so we just transferred that over to our current student services director um but i think we really are supposed to outline that and then one other piece i believe we are supposed to require to outline um is in the event that the complaint is against the superintendent we had to specify a specific person that only those go through that was another piece that came out of that and that was a weird little piece that came out of it was that that direction of there had to be a specific person noted for those if that were to arise does that bring
18:22 any bells there that one doesn’t but you know sometimes i don’t remember what i made for dinner yesterday so i’m definitely gonna look um um and then so that was one question and then on page 12 section k it says identification of key personnel to be determined if um there is a way to have those key personnel determined and approved or unidentified when we approve the policy that would be helpful
18:54 and i think as i was looking through the older policy um that when we’ve made edits in the past few years it was put into the policy the name of the person and we may be better off putting more and you know again this gets to it might need to be tweaked in the future and it’s exactly what i was talking about earlier with you know staying up on policies and that but putting the uh title of a person instead of the name um may may be a better way to be doing this um and at least worth an ask to legal yeah because again where it may have to be a male versus a female because we are mandated on some of that those may change but yeah just identifying whether it’s the role whether it’s the individual um and then we won’t need this for the next meeting but if at some point in the
19:39 future dr bucky you just want to let us know if there’s any pd for those individuals that are put in those roles and if so what is that pd okay and i think that they’re when there are major changes because i’m remembering a pd at some point um for administrators and if when there are major changes i think at the federal level i think sometimes or even at the state level they’ll put together something and then if i’m recalling it correctly the people that are named in those documents or the roles then are the ones that need to be attending those um you know dr bucky correct me if i’m wrong but um some somewhere in my memory of that as well no when they were launching the title ix changes two years ago the entire
20:26 administrative team did a four-hour pd with matt mcavoy on what the changes were and what it meant for investigations colby has offered to do pd for the leadership team on investigative procedures as it pertains to bullying and harassment so i can ask her to add that she’s actually coming tomorrow to do pd for the entire district at the end of the day tomorrow as one of our professional development days on bullying harassment restraint mandated reporter so all of those very important things that need to be accomplished she’s going to do some training for the entire staff tomorrow okay um and then as it goes with those pieces at the time we redid it last time we didn’t have an
21:12 hr director and that’s why it was the student services director and the assistant superintendent but now that we have an hr director that might be someone we want to loop into these roles because they just as as course from their jobs if this is against these are pertaining to staff they we would definitely want them involved absolutely okay um so again this was just to me uh to do our second reading of these policies and we’ll be talking about these for a vote again next week but i see allison’s handout yeah i just have a question i i or a clarification for the lmrc that the way this reads that could be different each time a complaint comes in
21:58 is that correct so the library materials reconsideration committee um the principal will you know determine designees from it it he he or she will not or they will not always necessarily have the same teacher on the committee is that is that correct am i reading that correct i think it’s on a case-by-case basis depending on where the objectionable material is falling if it’s a library book if it’s something in the social studies curriculum or science the principal would then assemble a group for the individual complaint okay i just want to make sure that’s clear so it’s not always going to be the same group of people making the decision i just want to clarify thank you thank you um so this brings us to our enrollment and
22:44 staffing updates dr bucky you want to take that i do because there’s a lot of exciting stuff to report out on um i sent a memo that outlines at each building the hiring that has been done starting with the district level and building by building i think the thing that’s gratifying as you look at that are the number of staff positions that have been filled internally people that were in endicott fellow that decided to stay and apply for a permanent teaching position somebody that was a tutor that is moving up to a teaching position a long-term sub somebody going from a paraprofessional position to a tutor we have very high staff retention rate i put that little grid
23:29 on there for you to see and it’s exciting some of the hiring that we have done this summer we had new teacher orientation today and had an opportunity to meet there are still some outstanding positions sarah had asked me to address that this memo that i put in the dropbox on friday probably would have a half dozen additional new names as of today i think we extended three custodian option offers today two bus driver potential which is a very exciting development i think there are a couple tutor positions one at the middle school one at village i think mandy still has a special education position open dan
24:15 has an english position paraprofessionals seem to be the biggest need right now and cafeteria workers um we need some lunch and recess paraprofessional positions um but no one uh seems panicked about hiring at this point as you look at uh some of our neighboring districts and some of the emails that are going across the superintendent’s list today there are districts in far worse positions with some really critical openings that we still have we do have a glover school [Music] student services administrator position that’s going to be temporarily
25:02 filled but we are looking for that um student services uh administrator position which would also be the preschool coordinator uh that will be temporarily filled until that a permanent person can come in and that person can go back to the aba coordinator so that’s any questions about oh no sorry sir please that’s the team chair position correct it is
25:31 questions on staffing before i move into the really exciting enrollment update so um no classrooms are apps in a classroom teacher at this point correct uh the english teacher position would be um i’ll let i will open to mandy if she wants to talk about the special education position about how that would be uh covered at village but it is my understanding there are no outstanding open classroom positions other than those two
26:02 yeah i can talk briefly we’ve already met with paula and leah today to discuss how we’ll cover students within that caseload we’re jumping in and helping out takes a village we’ll figure it out literally yep i’m happy to weigh in on the english teacher i have a call 8 o’clock to hopefully this candidate will accept the position um so fingers crossed perfect perfect um and i’m i’m excited about what you’re going to talk about with the enrollment numbers it’s what i’ve been screaming from the rooftops for years now saying it’s going to happen and i’ve done my personal part um
26:48 so can i can you just talk about if that affects what we need for staffing this year yeah so enrollment has gone up um i might call it astronomically this summer matt fox started tipping me off to this when he had 28 in the two grades seven and eight returning uh to vets mandy then jumped on the bandwagon and i think her enrollment is knocking on the door of 40 students coming back so i put the district enrollment report as part of the memo this week to show you that we have had an increase in enrollment and in students at every grade level except grade four uh and it
27:34 was static at grade 10 but a significant and sarah shared with me this morning it’s almost 10 9.1 increase in the enrollment over the course of the summer so um we’re fortunate that we have the staffing that we do and we did not make any reductions in staffing to accommodate such a surge like this in a short period of time and i’m happy to answer questions on enrollment thank goodness grade 10 didn’t pick some up because that’s a massive grade i remember matt fox that’s my son’s grades i remember matt fox dealing with that grade over at uh that’s a few years back so that that was good that that one is remaining static that’s a 252 the
28:20 only 250 class left at marblehead high school
28:24 so one of um and i may have given you the wrong number this morning but it still is pretty high i think it’s closer to five i’ve given you that number this morning based on something else i was looking at but what i found really interesting is our kindergarten enrollment because we always look at what’s going out versus what is coming in because that’s really where the tipping point is and our kindergarten enrollment from last year to this year increased 14.4 percent and that’s really significant as we look at these kids are going to hopefully be in our system you know for the next 13 years i think this is going to come into play a lot as we talk about budgeting and where we’re looking at things so this really changes the dialogue because the
29:10 dialogue we’ve heard through every budget cycle for the last however many years is we’ve declining enrollment accounting enrollment and the projections show that continuance of that decline um this obviously projections are helpful and we need they’re a very useful tool but this data is very real and it’s going to have to be factored in as we look at budgeting so we just want to keep pushing that out to the community that we’ve we’ve seen the increase we’ve built the new schools if you build it they will come and and now we we have these numbers so thank you for giving us all this information i’m going to open it up to any other questions emily or allison
29:56 nope okay um that moves us to our schedule of bills everybody had those in our dropbox um this number’s a little bit larger but as the first um meeting of the school year this often happens because we’ve been we’ve been carrying these through the summer this is a motion to approve the identified schedule bills totaling one million one hundred sixty five thousand one hundred sixteen dollars and sixty-five cents so moved moved by sarah gold becky i’m seconded by allison taylor discussion and rollball emily barron yes allison taylor yes sarah gold
30:41 sarah gold sarah gold yes sarah fox yes all right um the next item on the agenda was on during our retreat as well it’s the stipend equipment and discussion for hybrid meetings as i’m sure everyone’s noticed we are all fully remote today um what has happened is throughout the spring and much of last year we were very fortunate in that we had the equipment needed to run these hybrid meetings it’s this i i’m going off with stephen has told me i am not very tech savvy so it’s this bar that really facilitates the public being able to hear the school committee members and see everyone appropriately um and we were using some of the equipment that had been purchased for the brown school it hadn’t been
31:29 installed in that space yet um and we were trialing it to work out any kinks that has since been installed at the brown school so we no longer have that equipment to use we have the option to go back to all running off of our laptops and um the downside to that is i can tell you from when i was remote and talking to you all when you’re on your your laptops there was often times where we could not hear you as the public like people not on site it was very hard to hear um or if there’s technology things i saw drastic change when we transitioned to that tech equipment that bar that we are borrowing from brown um i can’t speak to what it was like for you guys to hear
32:16 what people were saying because i i was always remote so maybe one of you can speak to that a little bit um so so stephen had worked up a quote for what’s called the polystudio x70 video conferencing kit and stand um and we’ve we’ve seen that we saw it back in july during our retreat and it’s been back in our dropbox again um and then regardless of if we choose to go with that or not there would there’s been a request made that the school committee create a stipend for a position for technologists to assist with these meetings um when stephen or a member of his team has been saying to do this for us they’re doing that without pay that got us through the pandemic we’re very grateful very fortunate that they
33:02 were able to do that but moving forward it really is a stipend position much so like what lisa does for us is our clerk um i thought that that was an absolutely reasonable request and um he earmarked roughly about three thousand dollars for the year for that statement stipend for the tech assistant throughout the throughout all the meetings um there seems to be some discussion michelle had brought up whether or not we want to do a flat fee or pay a per meeting fee either way it would work within that budget um aldiford and michelle and what the best mechanism for that would be whether it’s a flat fee or a per meeting fee but i’d like to open this up for discussion from the committee
33:53 emily so as the person doing the tech on this meeting uh it’s very difficult to be a committee member and do all this other stuff so having the stipend position is necessary i would say i know sarah gold you did it a lot and it’s very it’s hard and i’ll just do i i spent a few hours after our summer meeting um because some people would read some committee members had rightfully raised some concern about you know given that we didn’t pass the the additional funding spending any money um one thing so i spent several hours looking for grants seeing if there were any grants out there that would facilitate this equipment um it’s roughly about five thousand dollars this
34:39 equipment um i did not see anything that does not mean that if i kept looking i just i looked for several hours and i could not find one that pertains to this um dr bucky and michelle have assured me that there is room in our budget and this would not take anything away from students if we do if it is the will of the committee to proceed with this what i would recommend is that during school hours when not in use by the school committee that this this equipment be able to be used by any personnel in the school that can can coordinate that with stephen and needs it allison yeah so i uh i just want to reiterate what i said at the retreat that i think we need uh to understand that this is the best quote that we’re gonna get on this i think
35:25 it’s a piece of equipment that we need i think that the attendance we get when we offer the hybrid to folks is significantly higher and i think that it encourages people to come that you know maybe have young children are in the middle of putting them to bed at the seven o’clock hour and that sort of thing and i think that it’s important that we provide that opportunity to the community i think it’s important that we do it in the best way possible meaning with a system that’s going to help facilitate clear and transparent communication um i spent a little time after looking because you’re right there were people that that questioned the cost uh this this kit seems to be much more expensive if you just search for it online so i do trust that this is the best quote that we’re going to get on it
36:10 and i certainly think it would be a piece of equipment that would come in handy for years to come okay okay um i’ll just sorry i was just kind of waiting to obviously i’ve got a little bit more background information on this as well having stood in sarah’s seat for a while um so you know everything that sarah everything that you laid out is exactly what steven and i had talked about all last spring um and you know and emily’s correct you know i would have i would usually have megan and dr bucky and then additionally when stephen was helping us out stephen would help um let people in and and coordinate the meeting that way um because it is a lot and it is really hard to um participate in in the meeting let alone you know like run the meeting and then do all of that as well so um
36:56 um um i think it’s a needed piece of equipment i’m just really struggling with the idea of close to nine thousand dollars all in on this um if we’re adding the stipend with the i think it’s 56 something um for the for the equipment um you know after when we have other other things that that it could be spent on um yeah it you know it kind of comes in and out of my head at points you know throughout the summer um and i just i i’m struggling with that with with allotting this some to that and i can say you know for what you said sarah about being able to have others use it i think you know steven’s ideas
37:42 behind this was that it was going to be put onto a cart it was going to be very easy to access and set up and use and everything so i think that being able to say that and and have others use it is seems from everything that i know in my conversations with stephen to be um something that would probably you know i don’t know that i would be able to do it because i’m also not very tech savvy but anybody who knows a little bit about tech probably would be able to do it um so i think that that’s you know that those aren’t just words um but again i i just keep kind of gritting my teeth at the at the cost of it um to move this forward it’s it’s just you know it’s a lot and if we have library resources and that you know i understand and you know maybe um
38:28 michelle or dr bucky can speak to this a little bit better but i understand the idea that our budget could absorb it um i guess the quest the lingering question then i apologize for not having asked it before this meeting is but are there other things that we’d be better off spending that money on um in one one thing i two thoughts i have is we’ve heard a lot from the community about wanting to see everything that’s going on seeing all if you if you will seeing the sausage made um and my concern is this without this because that other equipment rightfully had to go into brown that really will take us several steps back in the community feeling like they’re
39:14 able to get a view of what’s going on how we’re doing things and i think if one of our goals this year would be really improving our community continuing to approve our communication and community engagement that to not do this would really put up a wall between us in that community engagement area and then i worry about the ripple effects that will have on on further properly funding our district one question i have and i apologize um dan for putting you on the spot is i know you have some technology classes at the high school school and i know that we have not given you any information but i don’t know if they’re during the school day if you know having
40:00 some more technology equipment might be something that these the teachers teaching these classes would find useful to work with the students um to allow them some type of training or whatever so then we’re we’re getting an educational impact out of this as well and it’s totally fair dan if you’re if your response is i have no idea what you’re talking about because i just threw this at you i have no idea what you’re talking about that you just do that at me fair enough um so that maybe that’s something we can look at and have and stephen can maybe answer that because i would think that steven knows about what technology curriculum is happening in our buildings and see if this is something that could be used to implement some curriculum pieces and i’ll just clarify my point sarah too i actually don’t see this as us
40:46 us either doing this purchase and or or not or going in person you know i see this as we would continue on zoom as we are tonight um if we don’t spend this money because i agree you know we’ve we have heard from the community that they very much want this um and i you know i’m i’m not a very big fan of through meetings i like being in person i like i think you know maybe i’m old school maybe it’s just you know my bend on things like i don’t like doing zoom therapy i’ll do it if i have to but i don’t like it um and i don’t like doing zoom meetings i’ll do them if i have to but i don’t like it so that sort of you know
41:31 as i as i think this through you know i find myself in a rock and a heart between a rock and a hard place because i really don’t want to be doing this but i also am just again kind of tripping over the the cost and i hear you on that um so i guess i’ll ask for the motion that we can continue discussion um i i have a motion to approve the presented quote for poly studio x70 video conferencing kit and stand in the stipend for technologists for school committee meetings so moved moved by allison taylor second seconded by emily barron and then we can have further discussion on this
42:20 it’s a hard decision when you think about you know we want to make sure that every dollar we’re spending a student facing i do really believe that this is an investment that will help us facilitate better funding our schools i i truly believe that i think the more we can involve our community the more we can include them in these discussions um the more likely that they’re going to be have the knowledge they have need to know why we need the funding um so i just want to inc i want to i want i want to i see this as an investment in community outreach can i ask a question of the of the committee members um you know because i
43:07 can think this through on my own but thoughts on on how this improves student achievement i think you know sarah’s comment just spoke to that a bit um but other like what are some other thoughts on that i honestly i honestly some of the really great um pieces that came out of the pandemic where parents that are working and might not have been able to see presentations and things like that could zoom in and see those i don’t see why we couldn’t take this cart if you’re having um i’m i’m looking at it through the elementary lens because that’s just where my life has been um if you’re having the pres third grade presentation where they used to have
43:53 where’s the colonial day you know why we couldn’t have this cart at over at brown so any parents who can’t attend and any kids who don’t get to have a parent see their work because their parents working in boston or whatever can can attend and see the presentation um so this because it’s on a cart could be used to then um include you know parents and guardians in in these pieces i know when we did orchestra concert i remember at one point i saw mandy with her laptop like on a stand in the audience so that family members could all see that we could i think use this as a mobile piece to to facilitate some of that too
44:41 i don’t agree oh should i put my hand up you can go first emily it’s okay sorry i’m just used to doing it for work so right so this is a good point like i think if you start up above us as a school committee we function better when we’re all together in a meeting that’s live and i feel like we have much more conversations and things happen um obviously it’s like but look it’s like hard to even think and be in school committee mode because i’m at my house and i’m not like in it in the meeting and so that what we do in those meetings trickles down all the way down to the students and having like sarah said parents be able
45:27 to zoom in and just listen we’re getting a whole different group of people that have never come to our meetings but also for us doing it on zoom so i think it just as a whole it works better when we can have that live meeting when we’re there having these great discussions and then having the families be able to log in and listen to us in the end it all is going to be better for the students if that i don’t know if that’s the best argument but that’s just how i feel that i perform better in a live situation than on zoom and i feel like i could do a better job allison yeah i would definitely agree so harken back to what i said at
46:15 the beginning you know hopefully having heard what the community was loud and clear about in the last election and and taking the necessary steps to even further improve communication even further improve transparency and provide the community with the best experience for being able to get involved with the school committee because again it’s particularly after the pandemic i think people got very used to being able to do things remotely and providing this option allows so many more people to be able to hear it and see it clearly concisely not completely resting on the laurels of zoom which i use all day every day my job’s fully remote so i get the problems there
47:00 but this would help that by having a specific system that’s there to better improve the quality of communication that we can have to the parents and if we can get two more parents and be more transparent communicative with these parents that’s gonna trickle down obviously directly to their students achievement okay okay and i love the idea sarah of being able to move the cart and use it for other things as well i as a working parent i think that that would be an amazing opportunity and i don’t want to i i don’t understand that the workings of the the technology and moving that so that’s for kind of we’ll have to ask stephen if that’s something he can facilitate i don’t want
47:47 to say that i can guarantee that um but if if it’s if it’s a way to further include community engagement i would welcome that um if there’s no further discussion i’ll make a roll call emily barron yes yes allison taylor yes sarah gold yes and sarah fox yes thank you that pass is unanimous to me that brings us to the boosters advertising session thank you muffy paquette for joining us and also for waiting through our meeting matthew muffy had approached myself and dr bucky
48:33 several years ago she had come before the school committee and received approval for the advertising that you see up at the football field at the high school it’s been a great program i think we’ve to my knowledge we’ve never received any negative feedback and i think it’s been a good way for the boopsters to increase their revenue stream so i will ask mafia she has anything to add to that i i do well first of all thanks for having us and i want to introduce the school committee to mandy caruso who is my vice president this year which is very exciting so the two of us are going to be a team this year and then in theory mandy will take over but one correction sarah that i want to make is the word advertising because the banners are specifically not
49:18 advertising they are um their sponsorship if you will they’re a donation in which we recognize with names no no emails no websites no phone numbers just the name of the company that has made donations to boosters which of course you all know that booster supports all of the athletics so having it not be advertising is is important to know okay um we’ve come to you this year for two reasons one of which you already well both of which already know which is that they’re really you all gave us approval all those years ago and i think that was 2000 what did we say 19 right and um since then we’ve been rolling forward but i think we had agreed back then that we would circle
50:03 back so here we are circling back to make sure that we’re allowed to do what we’re doing but adding to that because we have had some companies in town who would like to see the banners put on some of the other fields where the high school is represented and one of those is the um track at the vil at the vets at the village school i’m sorry and the other is the softball field at the vets and since i wasn’t specifically given approval for those fields we wanted to come back to you and discuss that um thank you very much now our policy um pertaining to this speaks of that the school committee at
50:48 any time can give approval for such items i have a motion prepared and then we can open it for discussion i have a motion to approve marblehead boosters to sell and hang sponsorship banners to be placed at hopkins field at village in the softball field at bets in accordance with the rules and regulations granted prior concerning such sales so i i have a little bit of an issue with the word sales such sponsorship yeah because we don’t we like to say that we don’t sell them that we recognize sponsorship and donations by putting up a banner okay it’s a motion to approve marblehead boosters to accept sponsorship in hand sponsorship banners to be placed at hopkins field
51:35 and village and the softball field at bats in accordance with the rules and regulations granted prior concerning such sponsorship yeah that sounds good can it be does that sound good to you does that work mandy okay sarah i in looking at the other looking at the previous uh motion that passed i’m wondering there was a caveat that about the school committee because i i don’t think we should revisit this annually it’s with it’s had its trial run it’s going really well i don’t think this is something that we need to keep our our minds on there yeah that’s my end date on it yeah so but i do think so part of the old um the old motion was that
52:20 that should basically should the school committee vote to rescind the the ability to do the sponsorship banners that the current banners be allowed to hang for the two years so and muffy you can correct me if i’m if i’m wrong and you guys have changed the way you’re doing this but i think as it was originally presented they were soul or yes they were sponsored for two years so we didn’t want to get into a position where the school committee didn’t like it anymore and rescinded it but then people had paid the sponsorship and were and there was kind of a problem there so the way we originally started you could you could be a sponsor for one year or it was a different rate i believe for two years
53:06 really this goes year to year okay um and so i think you can think of it that way and i think that you should be able to rescind this if something goes south but great i i’d be shocked if that happened since things have gone so well over the years we’ve become sort of a poster child for the north shore can’t tell you how many calls i get from people who love the way that it looks love the idea of what the funds go towards so it’s not only going well here it’s going well in other areas um and i’d read that language there and i think you’re spot on with your understanding of that that’s why i put in accordance with the rules and regulation granted prior so it just defers to what is already working and essentially we’re just giving access to the two new fields to for the program to run as it’s been running great um
53:53 so i’ll ask for that motion so moved alison alison um any further discussion i’ll just say thank you um you know as my kids have played on on piper you know before even i had a high schooler but you know and being over at the high school even more often at this point you know the banners are really well done and it never turned into anything approaching some of the concerns that were talked about in this original discussion um you know years ago that you know they’re they’re they look great and they look really appropriate and it you know you’re correct muffy i think the original language did have advertising in it but it they really they are not advertisements they’re they really are
54:38 sponsorships so i like that i like the change in that verbiage um and you know as always thank you thank you for everything yeah that you guys do yeah it’s great um i had i had one quick question for you that doesn’t relate to the banners is that okay that’s absolutely i you all had given boosters approval to move forward with the forever fan zone and i just wanted to make sure that as we continue to move forward that there wasn’t anything else i had to come back to school committee for um to my knowledge no i know sarah was going to work on in policy if there was anything about our memorial policy that would impede on that as i last read it i don’t believe that there was anything because
55:25 your plan was very very much so in line i believe with that memorial’s policy but sarah and emily as members of that committee can speak to that more i think we fixed that policy right alongside muffy presenting the forever fan section and i again i’d have to go back and check the minutes just to make sure that i don’t remember any other hurdles that for school committee that you would have to clear for school committee i think we just said you know it would be lovely to have you back to you know continue to hear about the project and you know and whatever we can do to sort of get that message out on your fundraising and um you know you know kind of facilitate that piece of it okay so i’ll give you an update just so you can tell me if there’s anything i didn’t think of we
56:11 have not finished our fundraising we are about to sort of keep summer was so busy we’re about we’ve we’ve raised quite a bit we probably have forty thousand i’m sorry i should have looked up the numbers before i started this but i wanna say we have about forty thousand we really need seventy five thousand if we can get a little bit more what i’m going to be talking to the mandy about and the board later is there’s a possibility that boosters can float the money to be able to get the project started this fall oh good that would be wonderful we still have pieces of the puzzle to figure out we’re still trying to figure out the right bricks what you know what it what is the right material to use we’re sort of in that phase right now but so as long as i know that there are no other things that i need to do with you and i’ve already talked to dan and we’ve
56:57 talked a little bit about how and when construction can happen but you know if things start to align in the next 30 45 days there’s every chance that this will get started and completed or at least mostly completed before the winter comes oh that’s wonderful to hear i believe you’re all set with any approvals you need from us but if at any point anything just reach out and we’ll put you on our next agenda okay terrific thanks so we’ll do roll paul emily barron yes allison taylor yes sarah gold yes and sarah fox yes that passes unanimously um that brings us to closing business anybody has any i have a few items more
57:43 just lookaheads for our next meeting um members should familiarize themselves with our current protocols as well as the recommended masc protocols as they’ll be on our next agenda um we varied from those a little bit um a few years ago and so just make sure that you’ve looked at both and we’ll make sure those are in the dropbox as well um dual enrollment i had asked dr bucky to reach out to salem state regarding dual enrollment and he did it right when i say immediately he called me a couple hours later and said he had made the phone call so that was great um and he will report out to us in the future after he’s had a chance to facilitate those discussions that that was just in the the let’s have a talk stage um and then not to steal dr bucky’s thunder
58:30 but he had contracted with a company called thought exchange and he will have more information on this at our next meeting he will also be using it to get community feedback on possible forum topics that the community would like to see i bring this up because establishing community forums will be another item on our next agenda so people want to just come with some thoughts on that as well and i see allison and sarah’s hand up i think allison you went up first
59:00 um i yeah i just so i’d heard um scuttlebutt whatever the word right word is and i i think that we should be open and honest about schedules for k-3 and what are those going to be published when will those be available for the public to review for us to even review not from an approval perspective just so that we have the information i know last year there was a lot of discussion with it and i think it would be really beneficial just in in the theme of sharing as much with parents as possible um that we that we look to to do that so that parents can be aware of the general schedule for their their
59:48 told at any grade level um i think would be beneficial um i think we could probably have nan present on schedule where the schedules changes may have occurred at any given level um at our meeting next week and if any information on what precipitated those does that sound good man okay perfect i got two thumbs up um and then sarah so i at our retreat i had talked about the edition of a curriculum subcommittee and so i did some research on that nan and i have met up once and she was going to do a little bit more on it as well so we need to meet up again and just really put together sort of nuts and bolts on it um
1:00:33 but i would love to let’s see it’s next wednesday um i’m gonna try to get that so that we can push that out and make some decisions on whether or not that’s something we want to pursue and then what membership might look like um our membership might be i will try i’ll circle with nan tomorrow um and see if we can’t get that together um for to be on next wednesday’s agenda okay and um on that agenda also dr bucky had had a request for two additional subcommittees that he’ll be presenting out to us so that can fit into that portion of the agenda as well if no one else has any further new business under correspondence just muffy had reached out for the boosters with the request for the sponsorship
1:01:19 banners as as we discussed earlier so other than that we haven’t received anything to the community committee as a whole um that brings us to adjournment at 704. thank you all and good luck tomorrow and everyone’s first day