School Committee

School Committee: January 20, 2022

· 91 min · Watch on YouTube →

The Marblehead School Committee approved the FY2022–23 school calendar unanimously, with a note that the kindergarten/pre-K start date may be adjusted earlier without requiring a full calendar revision. The committee also unanimously appointed Paula Donnelly as permanent Director of Student Services, pending contract negotiations. Additional votes approved schedules of bills totaling approximately $362,564 and three town meeting warrant articles covering the special education revolving fund reauthorization at $1 million, an operating override placeholder, and a school capital needs article.

#labor-personnel Lead ▶ 36 min

Paula Donnelly appointed permanent Director of Student Services in unanimous 5–0 vote

The committee unanimously approved moving Paula Donnelly from interim to permanent Director of Student Services, pending contract negotiations between Dr. Donnelly and the superintendent.

Read the full breakdown

The superintendent recommended that the school committee convert Paula Donnelly’s title from interim to permanent Director of Student Services, citing her exemplary performance in stabilizing the department and strong support from CPAC. Committee members praised her professionalism, her ability to engage with parents and staff, and her collaborative approach.

After brief discussion clarifying that the motion should be framed as an appointment pending successful contract negotiations between Dr. Donnelly and Dr. Bucky, the committee voted:

Member Vote
Sarah Gold Yes
Megan Taylor Yes
David Harris Yes
Emily Barron Yes
Sarah Fox Yes

Result: 5–0, unanimous

Superintendent (Dr. Bucky) · Paula Donnelly (Director of Student Services) · Emily Barron · Megan Taylor · Chair (Sarah Gold)

#admin-housekeeping ▶ 1 min

Student rep highlights athletic and academic achievements; College Board diversity award

The student representative reported on football all-scholastic honorees, the math team ranking first in its division, and the College Board's Female Diversity Award for AP Computer Science Principles at MHS.

Read

The student representative (Yasen) reported the following highlights:

  • Josh Robertson and Connor Cronin named Boston Globe Football All-Scholastics; Coach Redlock named Coach of the Year
  • 28 MHS students qualified for the DECA state competition in March
  • MHS theater department held auditions for Bye Bye Birdie; Marblehead’s Got Talent scholarships total $15,000
  • Math team is first in its division
  • College Board awarded MHS the Female Diversity Award for AP Computer Science Principles
  • MHS 8th grade open house scheduled for January 27th
  • Girls basketball 7–4; swim team undefeated; ski team first race that evening

Student Representative (Yasen) · Chair (Sarah Gold)

#public-comment ▶ 5 min

Resident calls for end to school calendar debate, cites ongoing antisemitism in district

Melissa Kavalich of 10 Camille Terrace thanked the superintendent for a community calendar forum while urging the committee to reject suggestions to remove Jewish holidays, citing documented antisemitic incidents in Marblehead schools.

Read

Melissa Kavalich addressed the committee during public comment. She thanked Superintendent Bucky for holding a community forum on the school calendar and acknowledged committee member Emily Barron for raising the issue of unequal federal holiday protections.

She stated that suggestions to remove Jewish holidays under the framework of DEI reflect a misunderstanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion principles, noting that DEI education is meant to illuminate historical, legal, and socioeconomic inequities.

She described ongoing antisemitic incidents in the district since her children enrolled in 2005, including swastikas drawn in classrooms and on students’ backpacks, and referenced an incident that week at the Village School. She called on the community to work together and urged the committee to maintain protections for all community members.

Melissa Kavalich (resident, 10 Camille Terrace)

#admin-housekeeping ▶ 9 min

Committee approves June 2021 meeting minutes 4–0–1

Minutes from the June 3 and June 28, 2021 meetings were approved 4–0–1; one member abstained citing insufficient time to review.

Read

The chair noted that recently posted minutes for the June 3 and June 28, 2021 meetings were available in the dropbox. One member (Sarah) declined to vote, stating she had not had time to review them. The remaining four members voted to approve. The vote passed 4–0–1.

Chair (Sarah Gold) · David Harris · Megan Taylor

#admin-housekeeping ▶ 11 min

Superintendent updates on COVID testing transition, Glover principal search, and DEI staffing

Superintendent Bucky outlined the district's shift from pool testing to an at-home testing program, launched a Glover School principal search, and proposed adding a dedicated DEI administrator role separate from the METCO director.

Read

COVID Testing: The district opted into the state’s new at-home testing program while maintaining pool and symptomatic testing during the transition. The state’s enrollment system experienced outages at launch. Families will need to re-enroll; the superintendent anticipated pool testing phasing out once the new program is stable. A committee member requested a simple, plain-language FAQ for families.

Glover School Principal Search: The position will be posted the following day. The search committee will include the superintendent, assistant superintendent for teaching and learning, a building principal, a school committee representative, a CPAC rep, a medical rep, two parents, and two teachers. A principal announcement is targeted for the first week of April.

DEI Administrator: The superintendent raised the possibility of adding a dedicated DEI director or coordinator role, distinct from the METCO director (whose grant funding legally restricts that role to METCO-specific work). Committee members expressed strong support. The superintendent agreed to research how other districts have structured such positions and report back.

Superintendent (Dr. Bucky) · Sarah Gold (Chair) · Emily Barron · Megan Taylor

#school-budget ▶ 42 min

Superintendent previews 'big numbers' in budget; next joint budget meeting set for January 25

The superintendent noted that both capital and operating budget numbers are in flux but are large, with the next joint budget subcommittee meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 25 at noon.

Read

The superintendent briefly noted that the budget process is ongoing with numbers on both the capital and operating sides that are described as ‘big’ and still fluid. A joint budget subcommittee meeting was scheduled for January 25 at noon. The superintendent also noted that the next superintendent coffee would be held the following Friday at the Village School at 8:15 AM as an open forum. The committee was also informed of a school dog naming contest winner to be announced with a pizza party.

Superintendent (Dr. Bucky)

#admin-housekeeping ▶ 43 min

FY2022–23 school calendar approved 5–0; kindergarten start date to be reviewed

The Marblehead Education Association voted the prior evening to approve the proposed calendar; the school committee then approved it 5–0, with an understanding that the pre-K/kindergarten start date may be moved earlier without requiring a new calendar vote.

Read

The superintendent presented the FY2022–23 calendar, noting the MEA approved it the prior evening. Key features include:

  • Three PD days before school begins
  • Schools starting after Labor Day; pre-K and kindergarten starting the following Monday (approximately September 12)
  • December 23 designated a vacation day with an early release on the 22nd
  • Good Friday as a half day
  • Full conference day in December

Committee members raised concerns about the late kindergarten and pre-K start date, noting hardship for working families. The superintendent indicated that moving the kindergarten screening to Thursday, September 8 is logistically feasible and would not require a new calendar vote.

Committee member Sarah Barron referenced the ADL’s guidance on school calendars and the ‘lemon test’ (secular purpose standard) in the context of the ongoing community discussion about religious holidays on the calendar. She stated she was following ADL guidance and expressed willingness to vote the calendar as presented.

Roll call vote:

Member Vote
Sarah Gold Yes
Megan Taylor Yes
David Harris Yes
Emily Barron Yes
Sarah Fox Yes

Result: 5–0

Superintendent (Dr. Bucky) · Sarah Barron (committee member) · Emily Barron · Chair (Sarah Gold)

#labor-personnel ▶ 56 min

Superintendent does not recommend granting paid sabbatical leaves for next year

The superintendent recommended against approving paid sabbatical leaves for FY2023, citing staffing challenges, and suggested the issue be revisited during the next round of collective bargaining with MEA.

Read

The superintendent explained that paid sabbatical leaves have not been common in the district and recommended against approving any for the coming year. Key reasons cited:

  • Losing veteran (7+ year) staff in a difficult labor market
  • Difficulty attracting one-year replacement candidates
  • Desire to revisit sabbatical leave provisions in the next MEA collective bargaining round

A committee member (Sarah) noted that an unpaid leave of absence provision exists in the Unit A contract as an alternative, and clarified that the superintendent was declining only paid sabbaticals. The superintendent confirmed that staff seeking leave could apply for an unpaid full-school-year leave with no budgetary impact. No vote was taken.

Superintendent (Dr. Bucky) · Sarah (committee member)

#bonding-capital ▶ 60 min

Committee approves three town meeting warrant articles including $1M special ed revolving fund

The school committee voted 5–0 to approve schedules of bills and to sponsor three warrant articles: reauthorization of the special education revolving fund at $1 million, a placeholder for an operating override, and a school capital needs article.

Read

Finance Director Michelle presented three warrant articles ahead of the town warrant submission deadline:

  1. Special Education Revolving Fund (MGL Ch. 44 §53E½): Annual reauthorization at a spending limit of $1 million for FY23. Anticipated receipts are approximately $350,000 (including ~$240,000 in committed tuitions and ~$100,000 in post-year-end receipts).

  2. Supplemental Appropriation (Operating Override placeholder): Language submitted to town counsel for review; a placeholder to preserve the option if needed.

  3. School Capital Needs article: Would encompass facility and building repairs, playground repairs, technology/security upgrades, and vehicles (vehicles now included in capital per town request). Described as a potential debt exclusion given the large number.

The committee also approved schedules of bills totaling approximately $362,564.

Roll call votes (both motions): 5–0

Finance Director (Michelle) · David Harris · Chair (Sarah Gold) · Megan Taylor

#admin-housekeeping ▶ 66 min

Committee discusses school properties; facilities subcommittee to inventory holdings

Committee member David Harris raised the question of placing a town meeting warrant article for disposition of unused school properties, but the majority felt more groundwork was needed before action.

Read

David Harris raised the possibility of placing a warrant article—similar to the 2019 Gary School article—to transfer care and custody of unused school properties (specifically referencing the Green Street parcel and possibly others) from the school committee to the Board of Selectmen. He noted that inaction would require the district to continue maintaining vacant buildings subject to vandalism.

Other committee members expressed support for the concept but noted that:

  • The facilities subcommittee has not yet completed a full property inventory
  • Requests for a complete list of school-controlled properties have been made twice without response
  • The committee has an MOU with the town and designated liaisons to work through this jointly
  • A holistic approach is preferable to one-off decisions

The Green Street property was identified as one clearly not usable for school construction due to wetlands and geotechnical constraints. No vote was taken; the facilities subcommittee was directed to advance its property inventory work.

David Harris · Megan Taylor · Emily Barron · Chair (Sarah Gold) · Superintendent (Dr. Bucky)

#admin-housekeeping ▶ 80 min

Building committee reports 41 punch-list items remain; subcommittee and liaison updates

The building committee reported the Brown School project is approximately 98% complete with 41 punch-list items remaining and a project contingency balance of approximately $1.446 million.

Read

Committee updates included:

Building Committee (reported by David Harris): Down from over 1,100 punch-list items to 41 remaining. Remaining work is scheduled on Saturdays and over February vacation. The project financial review shows a contingency balance of approximately $1.446 million, reflecting costs for items identified after occupancy.

Policy Subcommittee (Emily Barron): First meeting scheduled the following Thursday; Sarah Gold requested the subcommittee examine alignment of building-level dress codes with district-level policy.

Village School SAC (Megan Taylor): Monthly CPAC listening sessions by Director Donnelly continuing on third Wednesdays at lunchtime. CPAC has distributed a parent survey; members encouraged families to respond.

Middle School SAC (Sarah Fox): Eighth-grade transition to high school process underway through June; Vex math team is 3–0 and set the highest score in school history at a tournament.

Charter School correspondence: Chair Gold received a request from Peter Cohen of a local charter school asking whether the district’s roof capital request could accommodate the charter school’s roof needs. Legal and financial analysis indicated no mechanism exists for the town to fund charter school capital; Cohen was to be advised he could pursue a citizens’ warrant article.

David Harris · Emily Barron · Megan Taylor · Sarah Fox · Chair (Sarah Gold)

5 decisions
  1. Approved school year 2022–23 calendar (5–0)
  2. Approved Paula Donnelly as permanent Director of Student Services pending contract negotiations (5–0)
  3. Approved schedules of bills totaling approximately $362,564 (5–0)
  4. Approved sponsorship of three town meeting warrant articles (5–0)
  5. Held approval of minutes from June 3 and June 28, 2021 (4–0–1)
5 votes
  • in favor (unanimous) Approve FY2022–23 school calendar
  • in favor (unanimous) Appoint Paula Donnelly as Director of Student Services pending contract negotiations
  • in favor (unanimous) Approve schedules of bills totaling approximately $362,564
  • in favor (unanimous) Approve sponsorship of three town meeting warrant articles
  • in favor (4 to 0 to 1) Approve minutes from June 3 and June 28, 2021
91 min full transcript

AI-generated · may contain errors · verify with the source video

Transcript captured from YouTube auto-captioning. No speaker labels; proper names and dollar figures occasionally misheard. Click any timecode to jump to that moment in the source video.

0:09 just everything inside of the room is picked up

0:33 all right can everyone hear me all right we’re uh testing out some some technology at the brown school this evening so we’ve got got ourselves on video but we’re on the conference screen as well so let’s see how this goes um i will

0:58 grab my notebook it will call us to order it 702 and and i left my agenda sitting on my printer so

1:22 first up is commendations does anyone have any combinations

1:30 you know we received an email last week i believe it was last week with a letter commending the marblehead high school regarding their enrollment of females in the ap computer science courses um i’m not sure dr bucky did that include the scores that that got us to that with that commendation or on the ap test or is it just that the details okay we have a a great deal of participation from our female students so that was wonderful news so just to broadcast that anybody else all right all right [Music]

2:16 next up is yasen awesome go ahead and unmute yourself and take it away thank you sarah can everyone hear me yes yes okay good um so i actually did want to give a quick shout out to a couple students who won the boston globe football all scholastic honors uh josh robertson and connor cronin along with coach redlock one coach of the year so congrats to them and several other students who were also named all stars uh 28 mhs students also qualified for the deca state competition in march deca is a finance marketing organization so congrats to them um on january 24th the theater

3:02 department at mhs held auditions for the musical bye bye birdie everyone’s pretty excited about that uh math team our math team is first in the division we had a meet on january 6th and we’re also in the top 50 of the league uh marbleheads got talent is back audition videos are due by the 24th of january and the scholarships total 15 000 that’s a great opportunity um like sarah mentioned the college board awarded mhs the female diversity award for ap computer science principles huge shout out to miss wikivic who runs the course i took her course last year and i really enjoyed it it’s a great program uh mhs the eighth grade open house is on

3:48 january 27th and many mhs clubs are preparing to show off what they do to the eighth graders uh the national art honor society is holding their annual artsonia fundraiser you can purchase original student artwork printed on a variety of items and some of the proceeds will go to help art at the high school the freshman class is also planning a valentine’s day fundraiser with stowaway suites they will also meet with the beacon and dandy donuts for another fundraiser the middle school started composting during their lunch as well and their program is doing well the national green school society at mhs is doing a bunch of things they’re doing

4:35 an audit for a food rescue program continuing their no idling campaign and meeting with local government branches to see how they affect environmental policies in marblehead it’s all great things um and also girls basketball is seven and four uh the ski team has their first race tonight the swim team is undefeated and indoor track has a meet tomorrow and i think that’s everything wonderful thank you for all those updates yes and there’s all really great things going on as as always it’s always fun to hear about it thank you all right next up is public comment um i will ask people to use the raise hand function and to remember that we need your full name and address for our records

5:26 right i don’t have anybody raising here somebody just raised my hand uh melissa kavalich hi hi thank you melissa katlich 10 camille terrace um i just wanted to spend just a few minutes talking about um the calendar discussion that took place at the last school committee meeting um i wanted to personally first thank dr bucky for actually holding a community forum where members of the community came to speak about the calendar that was a very informative respectful and kind discussion between many members of the community i also want to acknowledge emily barron and thank her

6:11 for trying to [Music] make a point about federal holidays and how federal holidays give protection to certain people while failing to give protection to other people we have had this calendar discussion in the manner which the school committee continues to to discuss it for way too many years now we need to work together to appreciate differences within this community and appreciate that some people do not have federal protections the calendar discussion and the insinuations to get rid of the jewish holidays under the umbrella of dei is actually an uneducated view of what dei is dei

6:58 education means that we understand and appreciate and educate one another so that we look at the historical legal socioeconomic perspectives that have given some people rights well have not given other people rights the jewish community has been attacked this past week we have faced some horrible horrible forms of hate over this past week and this is not the week to suggest that the jewish holidays should be removed from our calendar with the incident that occurred earlier this week at the village school we have reason

7:45 to believe that our community has a long way to go in fighting anti-semitism my children have been in this district since 2005. unfortunately and sadly there has not been one year that my kids have gone to the school without having to face anti-semitism in some way shape or form whether it’s a swastika in a classroom whether it’s a swastika john on a jewish child’s backpack whether it’s pennies that are created into swastikas and chemistry classrooms this goes on in our district furthermore we have a history of having some teachers and some coaches that continuously disregard superintendents directives to not do certain things during the judicialities

8:32 until that can occur until we respect one another until we work together and build bridges rather than build barriers between each other’s this conversation should come to an end and we should remain steadfast in protecting one another and being allies to one another thank you melissa all right um i don’t have any other hands raised so that will move us on to our minutes um i believe the 617 ones maybe just made it in there right before the meeting so we will take those off of the agenda for this evening but i know we used to work really hard on the 6 3 and the 6 28 and they have been in the dropbox um so hopefully everyone was able to look them over uh

9:17 uh uh so does anybody have any corrections on the six three um it sounds like it looked like the um adjournment time was uh lisa wasn’t able to to get that from the recording so i was able to find that in my notes so i cleared that up with lisa already so that’s in there um anything else from anybody sarah sarah i had a i had several meetings and things today so i didn’t get to review the the ones that were put in um i believe it was yesterday evening but i’m perfectly happy to have seen i have absolutely no problem with you guys voting those

10:04 i just i didn’t get to read through them so i don’t i don’t want to vote on them okay um is everyone else comfortable with voting them at this point no all right so um i will ask for a motion to approve the minutes from 6 3 and 6 28 20 21 so moved david moved second megan second all right now you have the one noted piece that i’ve already gotten to lisa um we’ll do roll call vote uh sarah gold yes megan taylor david harris yes emily and sarah fox

10:50 let’s see let’s see all right so that passes four to zero to one thanks everyone all right uh john i believe that brings us to the superintendent updates so i will turn the floor over to you can you make me a goal yeah that would be a good shaver

11:24 so it looks like i have a long update tonight but i will be fairly brief desi has done some program updates uh from what they have launched in the fall with symptomatic testing test and stay and pool testing and they’re moving to an app hold testing program uh we got uh an email that the commissioner wanted to meet with superintendents at 8 30 tuesday morning we got that email at 7 30 monday night on the federal holiday i learned more from channel 5 news than i did in the 45 second call with the commissioner so the testing program is unfolding joseph griffin we have opted into the new program

12:11 we are maintaining our pool testing and our symptomatic testing but i can see those phasing out uh testing phasing out in particular because our vaccination rates are so high and they don’t recommend that vaccinated individuals participate in pool testing and if you’ve had coping you can’t participate in pool testing and so i’m not sure the time and workforce power needed for that but until and it will not surprise you that the launch of the new at-home testing program uh has not been smooth in the last day and a half they will continue to provide cic support for that um it will give us an opportunity to distribute to staff

12:59 initially and then staff and students at home test kits that will take the place of our test and stay program and there will be updates to contact tracing uh our lead nurse the anna mcmahon wanted me to point out that isolation and quarantine updates have been added uh to our website so i guess the quick part of this is anticipate uh some revised information and of course if you were enrolled in the current program that doesn’t just roll over so parents are going to have to re-enroll and they have a simple system that i think collapse today and so kudos to joseph griffin for keeping up with all of this we did have a webinar uh yesterday after tuesday’s launch

13:45 if you link on uh what i have in the dropbox uh that will give you all the particulars uh of the new program uh but we have opted into that we are maintaining uh pool testing and symptomatic testing right now but i anticipate that pool testing uh will be coming to a close once the new program is up and running smoothly

14:09 i imagine that will solicit questions and i hope to be able to answer them

14:15 anybody one question i mean to be honest i don’t really know where to start but just in terms of tests

14:24 what’s the process for requesting them distributing them how does that all work and who’s responsible for it yep um we will pick a day of the week for distribution and uh it will probably be similar to windpool testing a similar schedule to that um they are saying that districts can opt in next week for staff to get the initial disbursement which we have done um i don’t know if that shipment will actually arrive when it arrives uh it will come here to brown because this is where joseph griffin’s office is uh but the logistics of distribution and schools and getting those into family’s hands if he’s part of that

15:10 giant to be determined so that’s why we’re maintaining pool testing and symptomatic testing until all of these logistical questions can be answered okay so are parents expected to be testing their students at a

15:40 so basically so i i’ve been in these meetings sort of more boots on the ground than the school committee level um at tower so basically how i’m understanding it is that and i was also reading some articles on it earlier today is that they’re shifting the onus of testing from the schools more towards home um as we sort of are meandering our way through the next phases of this um and so if you if you maintain the pool testing their recommendation is kind of to go a few days out from that so that you’re basically sort of testing at two points in your week and then obviously if you’re not maintaining full testing then you then you’ve got that one point and that’s where you’re at um

16:27 you know it’s it’s sort of the next step as we are as we move through this um and and again sort of putting that back back into the hands of families because as i’ve gotten a first-hand look over the past few weeks when ever as everything has exploded it’s a i mean we you know we’ve heard how much work it is for the nurses but not with all of those tests um like when a pool comes up positive all those tests then have to be the binax tests have to be input into the i forget the name of the state system that they’ve got access to so that they’re being recorded and everything and so this has basically gotten taking that piece away from the

17:14 nurses so that they can focus on really removing like the the symptomatic testing like removing the students who are actively sick at school um and and what everyone knows at this point is that if you’re vaccinated and asymptomatic um particularly while our masks are still in play um that your your risk of spread is so low that it’s sort of this piece of like you know again long range long term on this like how do we move forward as as we’ve talked about before as the pandemic becomes endemic that’s how that’s how it’s made sense to me well let me go through you know

17:59 materials in the is the webinar available it is i didn’t forward that on to the computer i opened up the document that you linked in your update and this timeline is like within the next week yes okay okay you’re not prepared for that similar to the test that went out to staff yes yes i’m just thinking if we’re trying to get people to re-enroll it’s going to take a little while to get that’s why i maintained our food yes no which is great which i think is a good idea but we should probably be ahead of what’s happening this is that one spent most of the day today trying to log onto the system and get things in in play

18:45 play play okay sarah i think i saw your hand up

18:53 um and i i’m sure that we’re this is in the works and i would hope it would come from the state but it very well may not can we just have a really really boiled down easily accessible faq how do i get a test when do i test how do i report a test do i need to report a test just very broad quick not paragraphs because i think people are so exhausted that we just people don’t want to digest pages anymore and they just want really quick high-level answers absolutely sarah the state is here to help as they told us and they have put together some form letters that actually specify that information you will pick up your child’s test here at this time

19:41 and so but the system wasn’t keeping up with all of the input and so that’s what joseph was working on today is trying to iron out all these logistics the state is nothing if not helpful in this whole and as i understand it just there to sort of again answer a question you don’t have to report positives and you then just you know you call your child out stick with coven with you god of night i’m sorry you don’t have to report negatives and then you call your child out stick with coven if you test positive i just are tests being sent home with backpacks or you have to pick it up

20:22 if we can pull off sending test home and backpacks i think that would be ideal um because i think it’s another hurdle yeah for parents to have to i think we’re gonna have to see numbers to see how many people opt in and what makes sense for families and for school staff as well as much as they say they’re trying to decrease the burden on schools um that remains to be seen yeah six and one half dozen of the other

20:54 all right anything else on the testing all right so next up is the glover school principal search um i have a document here

21:06 we will advertise the position tomorrow that posting will walk um people that are interested in serving on the search committee as you can see will be the superintendent the assistant superintendent for teaching and learning a building principal a school committee rep a cpac rep a medical rep two parents and two teachers so if people are interested uh as a parent or a teacher or another rep um they should get an email to me indicating uh their interest and this will be in the weekly superintendent update tomorrow uh but just uh expressing why they’re interested in what they might bring onto the search for the next electrical personal um and that gives you kind of a sense of the timeline uh lasting most of february march with

21:53 an announcement of the new principal scheduled for the first week in april you know what i’m gonna ask great i i just never know that you know is there any way that we can bring this timeline up a bit certainly when we have the search committee in that first meeting if people want to make that a more aggressive timeline i’m amenable to that but this kind of follows the progression of how other searches have gone and uh i don’t you know now is the prime time for candidates who are looking and so getting posting up this month was important i agree um and that’s one of the reasons why if you can look at the calendar if there is a way to bring it up i’d like us to do that

22:42 um then um then uh school committee representative i don’t know if you guys want to do that this evening but we will want a committee though if you want to do that at the first meeting or talk about that but that is not selected by me that is something you want to decide you can do whatever you want sure it’s fine with me um not to put you on the spot you don’t have to answer on the spot but that’s my recommendation

23:16 behind that but because uh no emily you know is um our metco rep and she’s heavily involved in the diversity equity inclusion i think that’s going to be playing an important role um for you know our future leaders in the district and so i think she’s well pleased for that position i mean it’s fine with me i don’t know i’m always happy to serve i don’t need to serve um so yeah that’s fun to me sarah

23:51 um i i have no opposition um to emily whatsoever um prior to megan making that motion i was going to um just know we might want to at some point look at operating procedures or policy i don’t know if it’s a policy but um where whoever the the school committee liaison to that school is because they kind of already have an embedded relationship and i believe it’s david at um glover you already have a relationship with that sac kind of no have gotten to know the school culture a little bit more that you know that made that that was my suggestion that may be a path we want to take um for that whatever school’s sac rep to kind of follow that through because of that relationship

24:38 um but i’m not i’m in no way opposed to emily it was just a very linear path to me yeah that makes a lot of sense um and you know i i have i think i think the thinking behind emily is is great um david i don’t know you know that i know sometimes with work and everything it gets yeah well i mean i defer right so um this past year so when um dr satterfield was retained so i’ve done my time on on that search committee so i i and i appreciate that sarah too but i mean i think it’s also i think it’s a good linear progression as you suggest for us to look at and then also

25:23 then also then also based on you know balancing representation of school committee members as well going forward and you know like if you know god fits the high school like i’m the high school sec rep but i also have a child there so i would i would not want to do that so yeah but i think that’s that’s out that’s definitely something to pay attention to sarah it’s a really good point so okay do we need emotion do we need a motion i don’t think i don’t know questions so the next thing on the list is just an update on instructional walkthroughs that was one of my goals for this year and i just wanted to keep that uh on the radar that those are happening

26:09 and really are rewarding um it’s uh i’m very appreciative of the teachers that invite four adults to come walking into the room but it is an opportunity for administrators to align our practices and so to have conversations uh professional conversations about are we all seeing similar things and one person isn’t going in and seeing an exemplary lesson and somebody else is seeing something that they want and so those conversations have been very important so um the budget conversations continue uh we have a number uh on capital we have a number on operating and we have the next joint budget subcommittee meeting that will be tuesday january 25th at noon um and again those numbers are

26:56 fluid uh but they’re big numbers and so this committee i think later in the meeting is going to have some conversation about where we go with big numbers but um just wanted to touch on the budget piece some upcoming meetings safety committee will be on monday uh doing some great uh work there the wellness committee is going to be on thursday i will have a superintendent coffee next friday at the village school at 8 15 that’s kind of an open forum there isn’t an agenda or a scheduled topic for that so whatever’s on people’s hearts and minds and then what everybody’s been waiting the dog naming contest has been beyond rewarding we got over 150

27:41 150 150 different distinct suggestions um a lot of repeats because it’s a chocolate lab lots of willy wonka and chocolate and chocolate chip and so um

28:06 for the for the bedrock and also the mascotic glover so there are two students in mrs dobbins classroom asher and bobby who have won their class uh a pizza party and one of the four allen boys whether it’s bryce and colin hudson or rowan also suggested rocky and i was just gonna pull the name out of hat but we’re gonna do a pizza party for everybody that’s all very nice and that was beyond rewarding the nice emails that i got from families and pictures of their dog and how they named and families talking about we sat around the dinner table and the children were all excited so that was really a rewarding thing for me very good

28:55 well i hope rocky will be your zoom screensaver i know you know recognition of mogul of mobile so well he has to stop chewing things before he could become a screensaver right other things on the superintendent’s update

29:16 i’m just not sure where it falls but i do want to talk about us um such a specific thought okay um belongs here somewhere else probably okay right and that’s all we have we have the schedules and the warrant articles this is the only place that the budget occurs so i would say here so there’s obviously been a lot of work done on the budget today john’s administration up until this point john’s administering the team and us in the town and everyone um and as we continue to go through those conversations one thing that i do want to put to the committee is get your thoughts on adding a role for right now we have a metco director but adding in on that co

30:02 liaison role and kind of elevating that medical director to um really be focusing on our dei efforts and district i think we’ve seen loud and clear from our school community and the community at large that dei is a priority it’s one of our main priorities for the planning for success in our five-year plan and i just think it warrants having someone really focused on that work and we know from you know the job description and the work that’s being done now that metco director role is really you know focused on the day-to-day you know making sure that they’re the point person for our families that come from boston and um you know our families that are involved here in marblehead and

30:50 what happens day to day in schools um but so i just want to you know think about kind of having adding some more assistance there okay perfect yes so i love that idea but i think it’s more adding than your position not so much because the mecco director is a very specific um job and i think what you’re describing is more like i think they called like a di director there’s a specific name that a lot of these schools are including so i think you just have to separate i mean yeah no i think i’m effectively saying the same thing but you um just not to get it confused that like all is meant coming because it’s two very

31:35 different things so i just wanted to yes i you’re right you’re 100 right it was just that necco director rolls a director role at this point right so yeah we probably need to rename that role and i would look to john and michelle to figure out how to fund that you know because um right now that will condemn the brand and probably be able to do that going forward if you’re not focused on that goal but adding in you know also adding in liaison to make sure that we don’t still have that very important role right or in other words if we did if if what you’re saying is to do a dei and director of dei as sort of another administrative title um and then leaving the medco piece as is that’s what i would say yeah

32:20 yeah yeah uh sarah i think i saw your hand up um so yeah i think because of the funding mechanism and the rules that govern it because of the way it’s been set up um emily’s correct we have to you cannot have the medco director overseeing other elements for of the district it needs to be primarily and pretty much exclusively focused on the metco students because of the way that grant is funded we’re obligated by law so we we can’t do that um but i think the idea is to bring on another administrator to focus on dei um and so i guess we would want some feedback from john and the rest of

33:05 the administration whether they see that as an assistant position as a director position a full-time if it would fall under teaching and learn like how what that looks like and how it looks i think it’s a great direction but um it’s not as simple as just you know changing names of metco director tomeko assistant like we’re very we’re very it’s very specific because of our funding structure that can’t be moved around just to be clear i’m not suggesting we found this role on our program suggesting that we add someone to for them and i’d just like to say i’m so happy that you brought this up because based on what has happened in marblehead in the last week and then

33:52 we had another incident only a couple weeks ago like a few months ago we have so much work we need to do here that it’s impossible for just even our dei team to do everything we need as much support as we can get to get us to wherever we need to be with our students and we owe it to them to give them that education because and i think it is important you know as you sort of mentioned that we’ve got these we like this was a major piece of the of the planning for success and as you know emily you bring up a really great point that it is it seems a bit unfair if we’re we have this as a major

34:38 component to not have someone sort of you know dedicated to kind of overseeing that piece um whereas right now we’ve got some really amazing staff members who are heading it up and i’m liam you’re doing great work with it as well but you know to really have someone who is overseeing all of it and it’s coordinated and and efficiently moving forward can we can we have um john i don’t know if it would be john or nian or who exactly it would be but kind of just do a little more research and digging on some exemplary districts that have this in place what the structure is and just get a and get us some information on on um doing it well and not just

35:24 you know so so we’re we’re getting what we want out of it it’s not just like okay we’ve created this but we don’t know where it’s going yes is a quick answer to that and if the superintendent’s list serve is any indicator this is a conversation and a position that many districts are looking at because there are requests almost daily does anyone have a sample job description is a director is it a coordinator so i’m happy to do that research and report back to our first failure meeting and you know no one’s even mentioned the fact that there are a lot of initiatives coming from desi regarding dei and the expectations i mean there’s initiatives coming into the athletics arena as well so um you know this you know it if we want to stay on top of everything and sort of you know as we’re looking at

36:10 this budget as what do we need to be an exemplary district providing exemplary education you know this does make a lot of sense thank you thank you all right go ahead next thing on the agenda is the recommendation to move dr donnelly from the interim director of student services to the permanent director it is a school committee appointment uh but my recommendation is that paul has done an exemplary job and she has moved a lot of things forward and uh bringing stability uh to that department taking the interim title and making her a permanent director and she has tremendous support from cpac in this transition as well so i don’t know if you guys want to ask her any questions

36:57 or just make a motion to move that forward but i turn it back to the chair um i will allow people to ask questions if they have any questions that they would like to ask apollo anybody sarah

37:14 welcome paula hello um hi paula i just um i thank you wanted to thank you for you know it it was uh i think that at one point it was drinking out of a trying to drink out of a fire hose at some at some point throughout this year and i wanted to thank you for that and just ask you know if there’s really anything you have that you want us to know or or to share with us um um not specific i was expecting harder questions than that i think we’ve all lived it for the last year right now and i you know i i really can’t think of anything specific off the top of my head except um that i am grateful for the support

38:00 that i’ve gotten from everyone on the committee that i’ve interacted with either in this forum or you know some of you are parents um of kiddos on ieps and i’ve just been appreciative of the support you guys have provided because i think every conversation has always ended with what else do you need is there anything that we can support you with please let us know um and i think that probably is you know even outside of a pandemic life you know making sure that people feel supported by colleagues um and other people that they work with so i think that if we continue to build that mindset that this is a really collaborative endeavor that student services isn’t going to just be special education and that’s it but that we really all continue to foster

38:46 in all means all that these are all of our kids um mindset that i think that we can continue to build on um everything that’s going on so far

39:01 anyone else have anything from paula i don’t have any questions i mean obviously i’m the cpap liaison for the school committee and i you know sit in on the cpac meetings paul’s been doing regular monthly um listening sessions which talked about in our last you know our december meetings so i have seen paula in action both you know from an administrative role but also how she interacts with parents for me is a really important part of that of that job and i’m just continually impressed so i wholeheartedly support this i’m ready to just make the motion and make it official well i’ll jump in really quickly and give a few more kudos before we make the motion um but you know i last year i worked on the sac with paula at the high

39:48 school when she was the chair over there in high school and you know i just found her to be really professional um you know incredibly um well spoken and intelligent and knowing you know the direction of students and i think the time that we were in a small group together was when we were talking about what the portrait of a graduate looks like and as the um the the state sort of um stuff of the high school comes down you know what what we’re looking at on that sac and you know paula just had a really great lens into what student who students should be when they leave our high school after having you know come through the marblehead system and so i think you know i i’m i’m really happy that that we’ve got her in

40:34 this director position and that we are working to keep her there so with that i will ask for a motion to approve um paula donnelly as the director of student services so megan moved

40:51 emily second emily second anything else from anyone do we have to make the motion reflective uh to to state that we’re going to enter into contact contract negotiations that’s typically what we do when we make an appointment or no yes all right so i should print it more so that’s so that’s so can i amend the motion to to be that we are accepting motion to accept paula donnelly as the director of student services and entering into contract negotiations

41:38 pending contract negotiations and appoint dr bucky to make contract sorry i’m just you know i’m like a stickler for like the pieces um can i make a motion to appoint paula donnelly uh to the position of student services director dependent on successful contract negotiations between dr donnelly and dr bucky all right um so we have that motion anything else no polaroid vote sarah gold yes megan taylor david harris yes emily barron and sarah fox yes

42:23 yes yes all right that passes unanimously five to zero congratulations congratulations good luck thank you should jump rack ever so briefly because as we’re talking about student services in in the fact that it is that student services covers all of our students it doesn’t as many people often think cover just special education um this role that megan presented should fall under a report i would think to paula so when we look at that structure of a di coordinator or director or how we do that i would think that that would fall under student services

43:09 all right moving on to our calendar discussion i did put in the

43:18 dropbox dropbox calendar and what does starting to share on the screen um so mea uh voted uh to approve uh this calendar at a meeting last night um and uh it includes the three p day pd days to begin the year it does have schools starting after labor day uh the pre-k and k start the following monday but in conversation today people were wondering if we could have that earlier that’s certainly something uh that i’m willing to explore i’m not sure that that necessitates another version of the calendar coming before the school committee it offers the full conference day in december um it’ll be a half day for conferences

44:06 the following week um i heard sarah’s concern that the holiday vacation or the holiday recess was very short this year and it looked like it was going to be shorter next year so we have made that december 23rd day a vacation day with the early release on the 22nd um and then good friday as a half day and so when i put this in it was mea is voting but they voted last night uh to approve the calendar that you see before you all right um i will i will just so that we’re when we actually vote we know what we’re voting on i will ask if there’s any questions or concerns um with with the with the proposed calendar tonight sarah

44:54 um um yes first i want to just address um some research i did or actually the one of the outstanding questions was we’re going to look at if we could move up um the kindergarten screening because i kindergarten and pre-k starting mid-month in september i think is exceptionally hard on working families um i think it’s hard on balancing also the way we we don’t find until september kind of what’s coming in sometimes by numbers i think it’s really hard on our budget it’s hard on planning it doesn’t always lead to the most balanced classes um so we had we were going to look at moving that kindergarten screening up and having pre-k in case start at the

45:40 same time did we get a chance to look at that because i think that’s significant any year but particularly in a year when we’re looking at starting kindergarten and k not until september 12th that’s exceptionally hard on working families and one of the strong criticisms i think that’s been coming out lately is that our demographic has shifted much more so towards to working parents in a household in marblehead than you know when we when you say my kid started um and i just want to be respectful of of that and so if we could just get some feedback from dr bakkeon what the result of that discussion was internally absolutely that’s something that uh nan and paula and i’ve been talking about

46:25 and see it as very doable to move that kindergarten screening up and in my meeting today with emily we talked about maybe making up thursday the eighth as the pre-k mk it is uh challenging to have pre-k k one two and three all start because pre-k and k have not had school experience in definitely for pre-k and some with k and so giving one two and three a couple days to be in the building and to get underway uh rather than to have all five grade levels starting at the same time but thursday the eighth seems like a very manageable date for us and then what about the piece with um

47:11 kindergarten registration yeah earlier in the spring or june two different uh conversations about that

47:23 okay perfect thank you for answering that concern um and then the other piece is um just i just i do want to um speak to any idea that any anything that was said was based on lack of education um i spent a tremendous amount of time between the last two meetings kind of researching and um one of the most i think important places to get information on the topic like this is the anti-defamation league um they put out a very comprehensive very clear i think it’s a 56 page

48:02 question and answer if you will on how how to handle situations and planning in schools and in all different topics it’s actually a very thorough document that’s really easily accessible and easily digestible um and that is where all of my comments came from was the the direction of the anti-defamation league um so so um i’m a little dismayed that there was any idea that it would come from any other place um but one of the things they talk about is the lemon test and how everything should be hinged on the lemon test and i think um

48:48 so the lemon test for anybody that doesn’t understand what that is is that um in in public education there’s no place for religion as we all know um any religion um and that you need to pass the lemon test which means it needs to be for a secular reason not um any religious reason and so i think that we would prob my my sense is we would pro pass this threshold to still observe um these holidays that seem to be um what um what’s what’s presented and what the community is is speaking up for um so my sense is we would beat that we would meet that threshold but without a survey to see

49:35 to see to see who would be observing what dates there’s no way to know um if it’s a secular reason or not and so my only request is that we do do the survey to see who would be out on any and not limited i would recommend not to limit it to um the two more prominent religions that we all seem to to think of as more prominent being um the the christian and the jewish faith i i would leave find someone to write the survey to ask you know are there days you would be taking off under this exemption what would they be and and the lemon standard or the lemon test in the adl gives an actual number threshold of your

50:20 percentage and if more than a certain number of your staff or students are going to be missing because of that then it most certainly is for secular reason and under the anti-defamation league’s um protocols should absolutely be included in the in the calendar and that’s my only point here is that we we need to i mean organizations like the anti-defamation league knew far more than any of us i think i’m willing to say that far more than i do what is proper and lawful and respectful and if this is their suggestion that’s my only my only recommendation is that we follow their suggestion but if there’s opposition to that i’m i’m willing to hear that as well

51:19 i mean i mean i don’t know i think it runs into problems when as as emily stated last time like when the when it’s federally baked in um you know we yeah we live in a product unfortunately i don’t have an opportunity to change it i’m just i’m just saying that i i’m purely following the guidance of the anti-defamation league and like i said i’m perfectly happy to vote this calendar and go with it but i do think like i said these documents are out there and at least moving forward like them to be part of our discussion rather than it being more personalized um and i think that that’s where we we’ve you know hit the third rail on this is people

52:05 people people it becomes about you know someone not being educated or this or that when there are documents out there by exceedingly well-respected um organizations that cover this and i and i would just defer to that and i mean i’m happy to you know i think always you know referencing um sources like the adl is is always a good thing um i do a little stutter step on a on a survey just because you know surveys are are easy to put out really difficult to make a good one as we’ve seen last year um so you know i would

52:51 you know i don’t want to make i wouldn’t make any commitment i wouldn’t be prepared to make any commitments to do a survey um for that reason at this point i think you know this is continually a conversation whether we do a focus group a survey you know like the the calendar um superintendent coffee that john hosted was very well attended i’ve been to each of the superintendent coffees and um he and they’ve been that was by far the largest crowd um at a very busy um time of year so people you know prioritize that so you know i think that was another step in the right direction um and and you know as we sort of continue to move forward with this you know i think i i think each year we’ve gotten a

53:36 little bit better in kind of refining things you know i think there’s still places that could it can go um but you know i think i think this is is

53:51 is a good is another you know for for everything that needs to be taken into account this this kind of does that okay no that’s fine and i was i wanted to share that document by the from the adl but the mechanism to share things we can’t do that but i don’t know sarah is it appropriate for me just for the future to um like send that to lisa and have her post it like something like that sure yeah or you can share it with john and then john can get it out to us as well okay all right sounds good all right so i will actually oh yeah absolutely sorry emily um so i also after our last meeting went home and did some research because i thought maybe i wasn’t you know completely accurate and i forget where i saw it but they

54:37 said in a situation like marblehead where do you have a religion that doesn’t um doesn’t fall within the traditional federal holidays it’s best practice to if it’s a large part of your community you take the days off because it’s not just students it’s teachers and it’s easier for a student to take the day off to celebrate but it’s much harder for a teacher to and so it’s for everyone in our community to have that opportunity so um i think what we do is great and we are a step above many other districts and allowing these to be holidays on our calendar and so

55:25 so i will ask for a motion to approve the proposed calendar for school year 2020 to 2023. megan moved megan moved emily second all right i will call roll call vote sarah gold yes megan taylor yes david harris yes emily baron yes sarah fox um yes we’re going to look at that kindergarten start date though correct absolutely yes and that doesn’t that doesn’t impact the calendar because we’re it’s the start of school and kindergarten kind of flux within that okay we can move that back without a problem right i don’t think we needed i don’t i don’t think if anything changes with that that it would need to come back before us okay

56:12 okay okay all right that passes five to zero the last thing that i have is sabbatical leaves and i’m not recommending that we approve any sabbatical leaves uh for the coming year uh there’s not a history of sabbatical leaves in the district and um it is maybe even for selfish reasons but they’re some of our best staff members and losing them for a year and not knowing who you would attract you have to have been in the district for at least six years and so it’s a seven year veteran teacher or grader that would be out and you’re attracting somebody in a tough labor market for a one-year position and so i would like to be able to meet with mea and when we look at collective bargaining agreements

57:00 for the next round of negotiations to look at the sabbatical leave and so for that for those reasons i’m not recommending that we approve any specials for next year so the one of the reasons that this is coming up this evening sarah i saw your hand too um after i just say this i’ll call on you is because should as as far as i’m understanding it should be should john have recommended that the sabbatical be granted status be granted that it would come to us for a final approval because in that there’s a budgetary impact because we’d be paying the salary of the staff who is on sabbatical leave as well as having to fund that position for the actual classroom teacher so that’s why um it’s it’s being brought before us this evening with no vote because there is no recommendation

57:45 recommendation recommendation for with any that has any budgetary implications associated with it all right sarah go ahead um correct me if i’m wrong i believe there’s a provision for the sabbatical to be given as a leave unpaid leave of absence for a term of one year so i would and i do believe this has happened in the last few years i know a few individuals who have taken them in the last few years and one just came back from what i believe last year um but my concern is our teachers are incredibly um stressed and burnt out and i for the exact reasons that dr bucky is recommending not to give this because these are seasoned employees i would

58:32 recommend that we reconsider that and give it these are people that have shown up every day i don’t know who the individuals are but the this our staff has showed up every day some of them just need a break a breather so it’s not to be a burnt out and leave this profession of teaching and i think if we do not honor their request that we are potentially very potentially looking at the staff just outright leaving this is a hot job market teachers are in demand they can leave us for a year and get a job somewhere else probably with no problem versus if we extend the goodwill of offering them a one-year unpaid sabbatical and leave of absence

59:18 they can take their breather and they can come back and rejoin us um and we’re not losing that talent versus if we say no i i think we will there’s a very strong potential of losing talent and losing good teachers and i think by approving this it’s a way of us saying we value what our teachers have done for us for the last two years and we value the needs they have right now and we support them um we can’t do it probably financially and i totally understand that but i think an unpaid leave of absence um for a year is is in my opinion what i would hope we would consider absolutely yeah yeah that’s in his memo i oh i read the memo twice i didn’t see i just said that we were gonna not approve this

1:00:05 we’re not approving the paid sabbatical leave or he’s not recommending that we approve the paid sabbatical leave so so alternately and in accordance with the unit a contract applicants may consider submitting a formal request for an unpaid full school year leave which at that point then also would have no budget implications oh i read that as and this is what they’re doing okay all right so they can reapply and we would we would assume that we would grant that okay i apologize i had read that that that’s what was going on and we were saying no to it i apologize

1:00:45 and that’s all i have thank you all right thank you john all right

1:00:55 yes michelle is up we’ve got our finance area and i believe schedules are first on there so let me just quickly find that memo um can i get a motion to approve the identified schedules of bills totaling 362 564 dollars and 34 cents megan moved second go ahead i’ll take david sorry i heard you first um any questions but all that all of them were in the dropbox as well

1:01:33 all right um i will call roll call uh sarah gold yes megan taylor yes david harris yes emily baron yes and sarah fox yes all right thank you everyone 7-5-0 all right now michelle we’ve got our warrant article piece um so michelle welcome um i will let you sort of kick it off and we can take it from there yes so um we had learned earlier this week that the town meeting warren articles are due to the town by tomorrow so we are getting in under that deadline um we thought we had a little bit longer we don’t but that’s okay so routinely we have at least one annual article that we submit to the border

1:02:19 selectment and that is for our special education revolving fund it is a type of revolving fund it’s under mass general law chapter 44 section 53 and a half which most of the town’s revolving funds are under however we only have one fund under that particular part of the mass general law and that’s why we’re only voting this one article rather than all of our warrants i mean all of our revolving funds that we have and it means it requires annual reauthorization by town meeting and in addition to that annual reauthorization we also have to set a limit which is applied to our spending the fund can can collect and reserve as much funding that comes in however we are limited to spending only up to that dollar amount that is voted by town

1:03:04 meeting each year so um this year i recommend our special education revolving fund we set it a limit of a million dollars that’s much higher than you’re anticipating actually bringing in next year but the limit can be as high as it really wanted to be um or we wanted it to be you know as long as tom meeting agreed because if the funds aren’t in that fund and have been received then we can’t spend them um but if we receive funds in excess of the dollar amount that is authorized then we cannot spend them which essentially the spending of this fund reduces our reliance on the operating budget so this is a good thing right now we only have um probable

1:03:50 tuitions committed for next year about 240 000 um and then typically we also have usually about a hundred thousand that comes in after year end for the previous fiscal year so at this time i’m only anticipating about 350 000 but we really need to also revisit this program and potentially bring in additional students which will raise that revenue amount and reduce some reliance on our operating budget so at this time i recommend we move forward a request for the special education revolving fund reauthorization in the amount of one million dollars for fiscal year 23. um in addition to that i really don’t know if that requires a school committee vote i don’t believe so because it’s just an annual reauthorization that it typically

1:04:35 just goes on the time meeting hard but if if school committee decided to vote that i don’t think there’s a problem with that um we do have two other warren articles that are really placeholders and we have confirmed with jason silver that there are placeholders for both of these articles one is for a supplemental appropriation for the school department which essentially is the operating override we’re not sure where this will go at this point it’s still early on in the budget process but we want to make sure that we have that mechanism built in should we need it so we have um proposed some more language the warrant article language to town council and she is reviewing it and will get back to us with the final wording

1:05:20 but we want to make sure we have that placeholder on there for the operating override and then lastly we also would like to place an article for school capital needs which essentially the town would decide the funding mechanism but it has been decided because it’s such a large or hasn’t been decided has been discussed that it’s such a large number that um it is potentially a debt exclusion so this was for the school capital needs which would encompass all of the facility building repairs playground repairs as well as some technology software and upgrades which would include all the security cameras and whatnot so there are three warrant articles that we really want to make sure that we have placeholders or authorization um submitted to the town

1:06:08 for the upcoming annual time meeting shelton i just got a quick question before we sort of dig into that um did i hear you correctly you don’t think we need to vote any of this that that it’s okay that we’re looking at this tonight and and kind of just allowing it to move forward i believe so i know the um the revolving fund does not require a school committee vote and where we have already confirmed that the town has confirmed that we have placeholders for both the operating override and the art of the capital article um i don’t believe it requires a smoke money but i don’t think it could hurt but um i do do not think it’s required okay

1:06:53 i would like to vote all three and i say that because a in the past we have and i sat in on another boards meeting this week week and they had town council there and they were asking them for a formal vote for theirs so just to cover us because the towing line is so close i would hate for us to not make it under technicality so i’d like to make a motion for the school committee to support and sponsor the aforementioned three articles um four-town meeting

1:07:28 second second emily’s only second all right well just historically you know and i know for sure when bill was here we talked about this at length that we don’t need to vote that uh special ed revolving i don’t think it hurts but precedence wise we don’t need to um and again i have no problem you know just all saying you know voting and agreeing that we put those articles in i think it’s going to be more important though when we decide if we’re going to act on those and what that would look like i think that’s the vote that you know it’s going to really come for us but you know if it’s just kind of almost all of us agree that’s fine yeah i think i i would agree with sarah that it makes me feel a little bit better to have the vote actually taken so that there’s no technicalities um that can trip things up

1:08:18 as i said i don’t think it will hurt so um better be safe than sorry and so i’ll just add that that since 2019 we we have had this article in the the town of warren um past practice prior to 2019 if you go back as far as uh my research i went back as far as 2009 we had we had one supplemental expense of departments article for me i would i would be in favor of having one article but given where we’re at right now and the direction that we’re going in um

1:09:04 with a lot of uncertainty i think um it’s best that we just for purposes of having it on the warrant is to go forward with the recommendation that michelle’s that michelle is making here michelle can i ask you a quick question too with the capital um the capital piece does that include uh the vehicle requests as well or is that a separate thing nope that would include that as well this year for the first time the town has asked us to include the vehicles on the capital request and not as a separate rolling stock request okay

1:09:39 any other questions from the show can we take a vote all right uh sarah gold yes megan taylor yes david harris yes emily baron yes sarah fox yes yes all right uh those pass five to zero um through the chair yes go ahead david so i had one other thing that i just wanted to bring forward to the committee and in 2019 when we decided that the gary school was no longer needed as a school property we sought the guidance of town council on what the procedure would be to um remove the property under the

1:10:26 guidance and custody and control of the schools and for some of us we recall that process involved the school committee taking a vote and saying okay we’re we’re done with gary and then article 53 i’ll be brief but article 53 that appeared on the warrant in 2019 was gary school reuse to see if the town will vote to change the use of the gary school building and grounds from school purposes to general municipal purposes and transfer the care in custody and control of same to the border selectmen for further reuse as recommended by the gary school reuse committee and if appropriate as determined by the board to further authorize the board to sell

1:11:11 the gary school building and land in america that they determined to be the most beneficial to the town and take any action relative there too sponsored by so that needs to be sponsored by the board of selectmen so i reached out to jackie knowing that these warren articles you know there’s going to be a period of time there’s next week for citizen articles as well and then the selectmen do need to take a formal vote to close the warrant so they’ve asked us to submit them by friday and certainly the selectmen will have articles that need to be sponsored and various town committees will and then there’s citizen articles but i just wanted to bring this up because i while we have not put together any sub committees to to look at this or we haven’t had any formal discussions as a committee you know we have talked we have had a

1:11:59 presentation from abbott library about um the use of the coffin school we’ve talked about um potentially that there could have been some changes at widget road and we might needed needed administrative space you know there’s been a lot of various discussions but my just general thought was i didn’t think there would be any harm or foul if um if we were in support of i mean we haven’t taken any votes i’m not saying take any votes or make any decisions but if we decided say in may or in may to make a decision that evoluth is no longer needed for any school programming any um things that that we foresee coming up in the future and we wanted to take this motion to put it back over to the town we wouldn’t be able to because we

1:12:44 wouldn’t have you know the selectmen wouldn’t have this article there and um but on the flip side if we if we don’t take a vote in the next five months to you know take any moves with those two properties the article would just die on the vine with indefinite postponement so i just wanted to put that out there for discussion and um i think once again i haven’t talked with you dr bucky and or michelle or the committee hasn’t even talked about it but it would seem to me well we could put properties there for consideration the first thing is the committee needs to vote that we no longer want it to be a school property and it would seem to me that

1:13:30 evoluth might be one of those properties and if it you know whatever the future reuse could be uh low income housing uh green space recreation space um whatever might be deemed appropriate rather than us have to hold on to control and custody keep the building heated you know the vandalism that occurred um over the last summer and various things like that safety and security maybe that would be in the best interest so i just want to throw that out there for discussion so just so clear just putting a placeholder on there in the event that we move forward on something it it would be that jackie wanted us to recommended that we have this discussion and if the committee wasn’t wasn’t

1:14:16 agreed was an agreement then she would then take it forward to the selectmen so that they could in fact sponsor the article in the event that we vote that any of our properties are no longer deemed and in your conversation with jackie did she did she needs specific properties to to go on to the warrant or would that be i didn’t i didn’t i think that’s what we like to talk what i’d like to talk about for a few minutes tonight and yeah it would you’d have to be just like the article said gary school we could um we could be very specific about other properties that don’t have schools on them

1:15:03 uh that we know are in control and contest custody of the schools once again but you know it’s just a it’s a placeholder and it’s a jumping off point whether or not we’ll get to it before town meeting i don’t know if we’ll have the capacity or not

1:15:23 um i’m perfectly happy to do that for the um green street property we know it’s not buildable and and is there there is absolutely no way that we could build anything for the use of the schools on that we’ve vetted that through our process with the exception of that i personally am not prepared i don’t feel that we um are we’ll be in any position to kind of have we we need to know where where are our we’re headed with our our 18 to 22 year old program with our central administration with all these things and i i just don’t think um with due diligence that we i’m not prepared to do that

1:16:09 other than brown street um i think we owe the community that lives in those areas um to have multiple public forums to hear from them um directly to to us who are the care and custodian in charge of the care and custody of those buildings at this point and we haven’t done that yet

1:16:31 um sarah i’m with you on the green street property i actually had a little bit of a conversation about that property in particular with john last week um and we’re shortly because that’s what i couldn’t remember and obviously it was before dr bucky’s time that that the when we went out to do the look at the for the for this building that green street is not usable for really for school purposes other than something like a playground or an outdoor classroom or something like that

1:17:07 yeah due to wetlands and various um access through through what um i’m gonna butcher the the geotechnical on that but short answer is no it’s not usable and how did we handle the property with uh marvel headlight we’re trying to remember the where there was the potential proposal for the other property adjacent to uh right so they he did that in a in a really backwards way they we didn’t take the vote before town meeting they put the article on to town meeting got a triple a town meeting a dependent upon school committee of that which then we gave we did that okay yep so we’ve taken care of that property okay so this whole conversation like this is why we have

1:17:52 an mou with the town and we’ve assigned two people from this committee to work with the town to figure this stuff out so i would really like to see that process work itself through to be honest and quite honestly this is the type of conversation that should be had there with the town and the you know and our reps that’s why we put the mou together with them so um and i you know one of the other reason why we did that is because there are a number of properties and i just think we should be looking at this holistically and not one-off because that does you know i just think we need to kind of have a plan and then start implementing it yeah this to me seems like we’re not quite ready to do that um so i think that’s my only concern with it yeah and that’s that’s uh just a second

1:18:37 second second that i do have that concern as well like there is you know there’s a there’s a piece with bike more that’s come up and everything so i feel like that’s complicated like it is the green street property for bike more is being complicated by the fact that we still own it but yeah it’s town property and so that was actually the where my conversation with dr bucky started um and being that but i but i i also don’t disagree with you megan because you know land is land and we’ve had that conversation before and you know there’s only so much of it here and you know we want to we do need to be strategic i guess for a lack of a better word emily oh i just wanted to say kind of what megan was saying that as a

1:19:23 facility subcommittee we have done initial talks about getting all the properties you know listed out it’s hard to acquire that information um but we did all the facilities assessment but i think this is coming up as the next thing that we’re going to tackle is the properties because it is you know an issue it’s something that we’ve been asked to yeah look at it yeah so understanding so yes that’s the process that i think as a facilities committee that’s what we’re doing we just haven’t done it yet so i don’t know now is the time to like go through the thing i don’t know i think we’re there and i think you know that’s you know david bringing about this really kind of we’ve got to just address it we’ve been talking about it for a long time so i

1:20:09 would really like to see that joint committee put their heads together and start doing that work i don’t think it necessarily falls you know 100 on

1:20:28 to give you an idea of where we are we formally requested twice the list of property the complete list of properties that we have care and contest custody of and just haven’t been able to get them but we have we’ve made the request i’ll make it a third time um i’ll keep requesting it um we just we just keep requesting it yeah so i think this is you know it’s a worthwhile conversation yes um but i think we have some work to do before we get there yeah and i do a good way to get us yeah and i do think it’s unfortunate that we are not ready to do this because i think you know what david’s saying like there’s there’s financial savings within there there’s just the

1:21:16 the care and custody of of the vandalism that’s occurred and you know this everything that happened at the green street woods last year so i think you know i i do i absolutely appreciate that we’re having this conversation and i’m really glad to hear from emily and sarah that like that this actually has that initial work has been started and that and that we’re sort of moving in that correct direction so okay great do you happen to know i know it’s emily and i and i believe it’s jackie on the the other side but i don’t know that it was ever explained to me who the other person is just so when emily and i request to have that sit down i’m requesting it through the proper person yeah i’m not sure i don’t i don’t know if i ever knew who they actually picked um yeah you know do you think it’s jackie but i’m unsure

1:22:02 of who that second person is okay i’ll i’ll reach out and find out okay

1:22:10 all right i think that michelle does that take us through the warrants you we’ve got everything we need yes i’m awesome thank you wonderful thank you so much thanks michelle thank you all right um so just to make sure yeah that brings us to our school committee communication and discussion items um any subcommittee and liaison updates um emily are in the process of putting together a policy subcommittee which we haven’t met with in quite some time next thursday so we’ll be working on that agenda and posting um anybody else well i have um i had my sac today with the vet school for um just two things

1:22:56 um we’re already in that time of the year where the eighth grade start their transition to the high school which is super exciting matt fox gave us the overview on that whole process it starts next week and it goes all the way to june um with different events for our eighth graders and getting ready for high school so that’s a fun thing that’s happening and another thing that he said when he went over what’s happening in the school is that the math team at vex is three to zero and they scored the highest score ever in the school’s history wow tournament it’s about very awesome and the basketball team the girls are reno and the boys are one in one

1:23:42 all right it’s just a little update

1:23:48 megan no i mean i think i mentioned when we were talking with dr donnelly but she’s been doing monthly listening sessions um and i think you know they’re well received in good conversation so i’ll just upload for those the third wednesdays around lunchtime um that’s it sarah did i did you have your hand up yes um can i put a request in for the policy committee to look over something sure um i know that in some of the principal emails that have been coming out there’s been a lot of reference to building level dress codes and i know that there was a policy at the district level can you guys just look at aligning that so that um our building level principles

1:24:33 and building level parents if you have kids in multiple buildings there’s like one central point that it’s all we talk a lot about aligning our curriculum but if we can align our our policies and procedures that would be um a good place to do that too yeah absolutely i can look into that and if it’s too much to pull because sometimes we’ll pull in um the the building administrators for those types of discussion so if it’s too quick to turn around that for this one we’ll put it on next month yeah i’m even just sometime this school year yep all right great um i’ve got that written down and that emily’s sac and then this actually goes nicely into it um the high school sack weeks ago talked about the need to sort of revamp the high school handbook and

1:25:19 so that that work is going is it falls under the sac um obviously it comes up to us eventually uh which is why i think it’s important to bring it up that work is going to kind of start to move forward um and it’s something that lisa in a much more broad way has been talking to me about too about making sure that the policies align in there and that some of them are sort of dead links and incorrect letters that go along with them so as we sort of have been you know and i know we did a big review and i think it was 2018 on the policy so my guess is that that’s where things kind of got a little bit misaligned um and that as we work on that that um that that makes sense and obviously the dress code is is a is part in the in all of those policy handbooks so yeah

1:26:06 all right i think i have i have one other so uh just prior to this meeting the uh building committee met we still do have a building committee but just a quick update we had gone from over 1100 punch list items and we’re down to um 41 punch list items that remain the majority of that work is taking place on on saturdays after school and uh will be pretty much finished up over the the february uh vacation so that was a real positive report and essentially when you look at things where somewhere hovering around 98 work weren’t complete and lastly we had a detailed uh financial review of where the project stands and

1:26:52 stands and stands and um we’ve been somewhere around 1.2 1.3 million and we learned we learned through further detail and close out of various items as we continue to get closer and closer to a hundred percent completion that we’re now teetering towards uh you know 1.4 million 1 million 446 000 to be exact i believe was was the number so um you know very very positive news and we’re very fortunate because even with that number you know as we’ve heard you know sarah and others have been able to bring forward needs that were maybe missing whether it was a punch board or um some special needs for

1:27:38 uh some of the classrooms um we’ve been able to fund some of those things that just either were overlooked or once they were in the school we realized that we needed them so um all those things are baked into that budget and um we’re in a really good place so sarah you were on the meeting too but that that’s the update that i have wonderful greatness yeah all right um that brings us to new business uh any new business

1:28:09 all right and then correspondence um lisa and i did put in the email that we had received from peter cohen of the charter school um i did reply so just to sort of sum it up um peter cohen reached out they need a new roof at the charter school as well as as he found out that we’re looking at our high school room and that’s ruth um and so he his wonder was you know is there a way since you know although they’re a charter school you know most of the children do feed to and from the marblehead public school system was there a way in which that their roof needs can kind of come in line with ours and sort of in that request um so i did get back to him i kept dr bucky on that email and i said you know that’s a great

1:28:55 question i actually have no idea um you know i did point out the fact that our buildings are all town buildings and that we were working on our warrant articles and so and so that was sort of how i viewed that but um i let him know that we would be talking about it this evening um to see if anybody else had any sort of working information on that um or sort of how we probably move forward yeah sarah

1:29:22 um so i looked into some of this too um i had reached out and asked um jason and michelle my got was that there was no mechanism through town meeting to do that and and that was confirmed um we are unable uh legally to join those two and to do that if they so choose i believe they can do it as a citizen’s article our citizen’s water article um but there’s no mechanism for us to sponsor anything or for the town to sponsor anything to allocate funds for that okay so maybe i can reply to peter again um and i will relay that information sarah um that and and you know kind of suggest

1:30:07 that he reaches out to um maybe well jason it can’t be jason um so who john again john again you may want to just try to get that out to him tomorrow morning the warrant for citizens articles closes tomorrow before johnny is birthday is next week for citizens citizens is next friday oh i thought it was tomorrow okay yeah so john’s monday yeah yes i will uh i will toss him an email tomorrow morning all right um i don’t think there was any other course on this was there just one thing i totally forgot on the cpac um they cpac has put out a survey to parents um looking for feedback on some specific you know areas that they’re looking to um you know to continue to

1:30:54 build on so if you’ve received the survey um please fill it out the feedback is very important you know for the mission of the cpac and obviously for our district and our students so um have a look for it it might you know be in an update from i think i saw mine in the village school update uh and they also you know come directly from c5 so check your emails please for that and fill it out all right all right so that takes us to the end of our meeting so i will adjourn us at 8 33. thank you everyone thank you 8 30 stops we’re getting can get used to them dr bucky parked right outside the door

← All meetings