Al Jordan praised the town clerk’s office staff for managing the recent election with reduced staffing. He expressed mixed feelings about the override not initially passing, noting he canvassed over 350 homes and heard widespread frustration about snow removal, trash service, and department head responsiveness.

Jordan raised concerns about the cost impact on fixed-income seniors, referencing a tax relief program at the senior center that he said would allow up to 100 qualifying residents (age 65+, income under $75,000, 10-year residency) to receive up to $2,000 off their taxes, which he argued would be insufficient if assessments rise significantly.

He also called for a dedicated highway department director separate from water and sewer, better public communication before road and sidewalk work begins, and greater accessibility to select board members. A brief exchange occurred when a board member clarified that select board members waived their stipends this year.

The chair opened public comment. No one appeared in person or online, and public comment was immediately closed.

Francis Nielsen suggested a reading timed to coincide with the ringing of a bell at noon or 6 PM, noting it would align with the 250th anniversary of independence. The board expressed support and indicated they would discuss it at the next meeting; a board member noted they sit on the Route 250 committee and could help coordinate.

Al Jordan (Roosevelt Avenue) asked the board to invite a Southwest EXSO representative to explain projected sewer rate increases he had heard about from Peabody, and raised a rumor that the school department found $2 million in unaccounted funds.

Amy Hertz (Bouvier Road) said the 2022 Town Meeting Article 11 ($12,475,000) was approved for road and repair, not new construction. She cited a 2024 town study finding $61 million in existing sidewalk repair needs and asked the board to pause Bouvier Road work and share plans with neighbors before proceeding.

John Acid (43 Bouvier Road) referenced a town white paper noting DPW is at capacity spending $3 million per year and that maintenance funding stands at only 14% of the recommended level. He asked for a public three-year priority plan, arguing funds should go to high-volume safety corridors rather than side-street new construction.

A fourth resident questioned why newly hired non-essential town employees were included before essential staff in a recent announcement.

Resident Anthony Mullen of 34 Central Street appeared before the board to report raccoons nesting in the abandoned properties at 30 and 32 Central Street, which are held under a family trust and have been vacant for years despite being structurally deteriorating.

Staff confirmed they had visited the site that morning with the building commissioner and issued a formal letter to the property owners requiring raccoon removal and boarding up of the structure. The fire chief was also consulted. Staff noted the properties have a history of prior compliance with boarding orders but the rear of the structure remains accessible to wildlife.

Mullen noted children have been seen on the unsafe front steps and raised liability concerns. Staff indicated fines and court action are available if the property owners do not comply. The board discussed but noted significant legal and financial hurdles to municipal demolition of privately held, tax-current property.

Mark Tinzando, president of Marblehead Firefighters Union Local 2043, addressed the board during public comment. He stated the union is deeply concerned that an agreement reached in good faith between both sides now appears to be unraveling, calling it a handshake agreement built on mutual trust. He urged the town to stand behind its commitment to public safety.

Board of Health Chair Tom Mazzaro opened the April 14 meeting by noting that a recent comprehensive community survey ranked youth mental health and substance use as the second-highest concern among residents, behind only sidewalks. He introduced DA Paul Tucker, Police Chief Dennis King, and Superintendent John Robidoux as panelists.

DA Tucker covered several legal and programmatic topics:

• Social host law (MGL Ch. 138): Any adult — or juvenile — who knowingly and intentionally allows minors to possess alcohol on premises they own or control faces up to one year in the house of correction and a $2,000 fine. The Marblehead town bylaw, while well-intentioned, carries only a small fine and lacks sufficient deterrent effect compared to the state statute.
• Warrantless entry: Police do not need a warrant to enter a premises when community caretaking concerns are immediate (breach of peace, intoxicated minors, destruction of evidence).
• Good Samaritan law: A minor who calls for help for an incapacitated peer will be immune from prosecution — this carve-out does not extend to adults who host or furnish alcohol.
• Programs highlighted: After-Prom Grants (nearly $40,000 distributed this year; Marblehead received $3,800 and will host Kathy and Chris Sullivan — parents who lost a daughter to an alcohol-related accident — to speak to seniors on May 4); the Nan Project (peer-to-peer mental health counseling); Mass Partnerships for Youth; Gloucester Police gaming and fishing programs; Lynnfield Substance Use Coalition; and a full-time restorative justice coordinator.

Chief King emphasized that criminal charges alone do not change trajectories and that consistent support, timely intervention, and measured accountability are most effective. He noted that:

• Officers have been reminded to complete thorough, well-documented investigations at underage drinking incidents.
• School Resource Officer Sean Sweeney Jr. focuses on behavioral health and relationship-building, not discipline.
• If the budget is not passed with an override, the department will drop to 30 officers, requiring the SRO to be reassigned to patrol. Tier 1 of the override (31 officers) would likely preserve the SRO position.

Superintendent Robidoux read a joint letter co-signed by himself, Chief King, and DA Tucker urging parents and students to prioritize safety during prom and graduation season. He described existing school programs: SURFF annual substance use survey, SBIRT screening (grades 7 and high school), Wayfinder social-emotional learning curriculum, Cartwheel online counseling, two student safety committees, a health and wellness committee, and a Magic Coalition student peer group. He noted the North Shore Recovery High School is being rebranded as North Shore Phoenix Academy to reflect broader mental health services.

Five residents spoke during open comment:

• Eileen Good (44 Brandywine) and Elaine Lansey (Ida Rd) urged the board to put the sustainability coordinator (titled “assistant planner”) and the Community Planning & Development director in Tier 1 of the override, citing $150K/year (about $1M over five years) in grant funding tied to those roles.
• Tom McMahon (16 Shorewood) demanded the chair publicly support enforcement of social hosting laws and attend the April 14 Board of Health meeting with DA Paul Tucker. The chair declined to respond under Open Meeting Law (item not on the agenda).
• Amy Hurd (36 Bouvier) objected to DPW paving over the public way for new sidewalks under the 2022 Article 11 road-and-sidewalk repair authorization ($12M / 5 years). She argued the article authorized repairs, not new construction; the bylaw requires advance notice (which was not given); and Bouvier Road was not on the prioritized safety study.
• Albert Jordan supported the Tucker meeting.

Nine residents addressed the board during public comment, nearly all supporting a multi-year, comprehensive override.

Terri Toro (MMEU/IUVE CWA Local 1776 layoff committee chair) described the human cost of pending layoffs — including a custodian who opened the meeting hall — and warned that outsourcing would not be cost-effective given existing union contracts and that parks/cemetery workers double as plow drivers.

Renee Ramirez Keeney said she did not care whether trash was funded by fee or override but opposed any approach that pitted departments against each other; she called for a realistic multi-year solution.

Jonathan Heller (parent and teacher) cited the town’s $7.7 million budget gap and asked for a unified community response, noting the school committee had already made enrollment-driven staffing adjustments.

Lauren Geary asked whether the town had recently requested state authorization for an early retirement incentive program; a board member responded the state had previously denied such requests and that recent requests had not been made.

Caroline Hawkins argued against an à la carte approach and expressed support for a multi-year override covering schools, library, Council on Aging, and parks.

Vlad Grinkov asked for an explanation of how the budget gap arose after what appeared to be a balanced budget at the prior town meeting.

Kate Thompson and Matt Hooks (co-chairs, For Marblehead) reported launching a grassroots campaign three weeks prior, with 262 volunteers, 2,200 website page views in three days, and 86 participants on a Zoom call. They said their support was conditional on the override being comprehensive and multi-year.

Alan Joiner said he opposed a large ‘supersize’ override, cited concerns about elderly residents on fixed incomes, questioned a proposed new clerk position at $70,000 base for trash fee collection, and objected to the Board of Health operating the transfer station as a business open to out-of-town users.

Sarah Fox warned that Essex Tech assessment costs were being significantly underestimated. She said Marblehead’s enrollment at Essex Tech was rising from 35 to 55 students, that the original $750,000 projection had grown to $1.1 million after a state formula change, and that a $500,000–$600,000 annual shortfall compounding over four years to more than $2 million would undermine any override if not included.

Rebecca Bennett asked whether low-income residents could receive a tax break when the levy increases.

The chair opened the meeting and solicited public comment. No members of the public came forward either in person or online, and the public comment period was closed.

Four residents spoke during public comment:

• Nick Ward (Ralston Road) argued the town’s demographic pressures will keep driving operating deficits and urged the board to consider economic growth as a third path beyond tax increases or service cuts.
• Albert Jordan (Malta Avenue) opposed cuts to the senior center, arguing reduced services would increase healthcare and emergency-response costs, and questioned moving trash costs from property taxes to fees as simply shifting money between pockets.
• Tom McMahon (Shorewood Road) called including curbside trash in an override scenario a “catastrophic mistake,” and argued that bundling override items violates the spirit of Town Meeting Article 50, which passed with overwhelming support and called for single-item overrides.
• Lee Blair (Marblehead Current) noted a community narrative that scare tactics are being used and asked the board to address it.
• Sarah Bass (Beach Street) said the town’s financial cliff has been visible since at least 2019, criticized a pattern of unmet commitments, and warned that threatening the library risks future debt-exclusion overrides and the town’s AAA bond rating.

The chair reported on several ongoing public health initiatives:

Wellness Fair: The second annual wellness fair drew approximately 200 attendees and nearly 30 vendors. Discussion arose about timing — some vendors suggested moving it later and potentially outdoors, though the board noted that the winter timing captures residents before snowbirding and aligns with New Year’s resolutions.

COMM Survey Results: Columns sharing survey data have been published in local papers. Stress data showed 76% of residents aged 40–49 report work-life balance challenges and challenges raising children. The prior U.S. Surgeon General’s framing was cited: the level of social disconnection observed is equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes per day in terms of life-shortening effects.

Focus Groups: Five focus groups are planned for late March and April, organized by age cohort (young adults via Zoom on April 1; middle age, pre-retirement, and seniors in person). Dr. Caitlyn Coyle of UMass Boston is facilitating. Board members will not attend to preserve confidentiality.

Mental Health Website: The ‘Marblehead Cares’ mental health resource website has been down for nearly a year. The board chair is meeting with the original developer to restore and expand it.

District Attorney Visit: Essex County District Attorney Paul Tucker is scheduled to appear at the April 14 Board of Health meeting. Town counsel has been asked to review the social hosting bylaw before that date. The board discussed inviting select board members and the police chief. The police department’s jail diversion officer has been conducting addiction and recovery seminars jointly with Swampscott.

Grant Opportunity: The Massachusetts Community Health and Healthy Aging Fund has issued an RFP. The board is working toward a submission by March 31. Planning-level grants of up to $50,000/year are available, with potential for larger program grants.

Extended public comment period during and after the budget presentation:

• John (32 Feet, marine industry): Suggested Scenario A was presented primarily to make Scenario B appear preferable; questioned whether other positions—such as the sustainability coordinator—were considered for elimination before front-line staff.
• Mr. Jordan: Opposed the trash fee, citing a failed attempt at a similar fee 15–20 years ago; raised concern about longevity benefit increases during a budget shortfall; questioned the proposal to protect public safety from cuts while threatening the COA and cemetery; noted he would not support a combined school/town override.
• Matt Hooks: Asked for an override option that goes beyond restoring cuts to actually improving service levels and infrastructure to where they were five or six years ago.
• Eric (LY Washington): Noted the library had informed the board it could not sustain a reduced-hours staffing model and proposed instead operating through December 1, 2026 then closing pending an override. Challenged the budget’s presentation transparency, arguing that moving trash costs to a fee is a revenue reassignment rather than a cut and inflates the apparent Scenario B town-side reduction. Argued schools are being asked to cut 44% more than the town side under Scenario B (when trash fee is excluded). Raised concern about the library bond still appearing on tax bills even if the library closes. Noted that in 1931 during the Great Depression, Marblehead opened a second library branch rather than closing the existing one. Asserted new fees require town meeting approval and suggested the board consult the town of Abington.
• Jeff: Called for broad public engagement and transparent town meeting presentation on capital and infrastructure implications of staffing cuts.

Four residents addressed the board during public comment:

• Resident from 7 Glover Square urged the board to support the Municipal Energy Reduction Plan and framed it as consistent with Marblehead’s net-zero-by-2040 goal.
• Resident from 6 Blue Court (identified as chair of the light board) noted that town buildings are MMLD’s largest customer and argued improved building envelopes would reduce peak demand costs, lowering rates for all residents.
• Amy Chu (30 Hartland Branch) expressed disappointment that a warrant article to dissolve the Public Works Committee was included, noting the committee had been productive and is advisory only.
• Resident (Mr. Jordan) raised concern about proceeding with the energy plan before knowing whether the town will comply with MBTA Communities 3A zoning, warning that non-compliance could result in MMLD rate assessments.

Sarah urged the committee and town to explore a health-insurance buyout program — paying employees a cash incentive (municipalities typically offer $4,000–$10,000) to waive town coverage and enroll under a spouse’s plan. She argued this produces net savings even at current contribution rates and suggested the PEC agreement could be reopened before its three-year renewal.

A second resident noted that a town bylaw requires health-insurance costs to follow salaries whenever positions are paid from revolving funds, and suggested the town audit recent transfers — particularly in the school department — to ensure compliance. The chair acknowledged the concern and noted it had been raised at a prior school budget hearing, where the school business manager had indicated he could not afford to transfer the associated benefits.

The chair called the February 11 Select Board meeting to order, noted the meeting was being recorded, and invited public comment. No residents came forward in person or online. Public comment was closed.

A resident spoke during what appears to be an open comment period, raising concerns that meeting documents and presentations were not being made available online in advance. The speaker referenced prior years when materials were posted beforehand and argued that transparency is especially important in a year with potential budget cuts and possible override discussions.

A reporter named Ika from the Marblehead Current joined the Zoom and asked where to find meeting minutes. The health director offered to provide minutes directly and noted that MHTV maintains a subscription service for recorded meetings. The chair suggested MHTV as the primary resource for recordings of select board, school committee, board of health, and finance committee meetings.

The board chair reported on the CALM (Creating a Healthier Marblehead) community wellness survey. Of 16,792 registered residents invited, 2,550 completed the survey — a 15% response rate that exceeded UMass Boston’s projection of 10%.

Key findings included:

• Approximately 86% of respondents expressed moderate or high concern about underage substance use.
• Approximately 85% of respondents identified bullying as a significant issue for youth.
• Open-ended comments highlighted teen drinking, loneliness in the elderly, and family alcoholism as top concerns; a minority of respondents suggested the board focus only on traditional public health functions such as restaurant inspections and sanitation.

Next steps include UMass Boston conducting at least four in-person focus groups in March, organized by age cohort, with final report and public forum anticipated by late April or May 1. Focus groups are closed-enrollment and covered by UMass Boston’s IRB for privacy.

Sarah Fox (40 Foster Street) raised three items: (1) requesting that Select Board meeting packets be posted online as the school department does; (2) suggesting the town’s annual capital investment target should be roughly $4–5 million per year rather than the previously cited $2–2.5 million; and (3) flagging that Essex Tech increased Marblehead’s seat allocation from 9 to 39, a 333% increase, which she projected would reduce high school enrollment by roughly 100–150 students in four years and significantly affect the cherry-sheet assessment.

Pat Adams (Village Street) spoke remotely about dangerous sidewalk conditions near schools following the snowstorm, stating she had witnessed and videoed students walking in the street alongside active vehicle traffic. She expressed concern that no snow removal had occurred near the village school the prior evening and asked for urgent attention before a potential additional storm.

The chair asked for public comment; none was offered from the six online attendees. The board confirmed its next meeting for January 26 and voted unanimously to adjourn.

The chair called the January 7, 2026 meeting to order, noted the meeting was being recorded, wished attendees a Happy New Year, and opened a brief public comment period before proceeding to contract approvals.

The first speaker read a letter citing alleged breaches of Mass. General Law and ethics by the chair and vice chair for releasing privileged information, and apologized for using incorrect parliamentary terminology at a prior meeting.

A second speaker (Sarah, Ida Road) addressed the committee on the fifth night of Hanukkah, noting concern that the meeting was held on a Jewish holiday. She described a Jewish English teacher at Veterans Middle School whose lead-teacher position was split one month after the teacher publicly spoke about antisemitism, and urged the committee to take supportive action rather than retaliate.

Reese Dalberg (MVMS parent co-president and Task Force Against Discrimination member) thanked MVMS English teachers and administration for organizing an intergenerational discussion of the novel When We Flew Away at Abbott Public Library, attended by 33 students and community members including Council on Aging participants.

Sarah Cox (46 C Street) alleged that the school committee’s decision to change school start and end times constituted a breach of Massachusetts General Law and ethics law. She argued the change — which she calculated reduced instructional time by approximately 36 hours annually at the high school — amounted to more than $500,000 in additional teacher compensation and was made without a public vote to reopen collective bargaining.

Karen MCL (11 Trager Road) urged the committee to fairly review a grievance filed by a teacher she said was removed from a lead teacher position approximately one month after speaking out about antisemitism in the schools. She characterized the removal as retaliation.

Public comment, in order

Sarah Fox (46 Ft Street) on enrollment decline:

• Enrollment dropped from 2,727 (June 9) to 2,511 currently — 216 students (8%) in under six months
• Concern about explanation of decline in relation to staffing lines and budget requests
• Noted additional funding requests would face town scrutiny without clear messaging on enrollment-to-staffing translation

Kate Thompson (remote) on missing meeting minutes:

• Formally requested minutes for three 2024 meetings and five 2023 meetings:
  • 2024: 10/17, 10/30, 11/17
  • 2023: 10/24, 1/7, 2/13, 2/28, 3/18
• Noted some meetings have YouTube recordings, but all require publicly posted minutes

Public comment moved to the beginning of the agenda. The records request was procedural — not a discussion item — but is logged here for the record.

The chair pro tem invited public comment from those attending in person and online. No one came forward.

The chair reported that the Comm Wellness Initiative community survey received 2,640 total responses, of which 2,523 were deemed valid after UMass Boston partners identified 117 blank submissions. That figure represents over 15% of the approximately 16,000 postcards mailed to Marblehead residents aged 18 and older — higher than anticipated.

Key outreach included a Code Red notification, restaurant table cards, and social media. The chair noted the survey was funded without any taxpayer dollars.

Next steps:

• December 3 leadership council meeting (tentatively open to the public) for initial data review
• Four or five focus groups planned for Q1, with particular interest in the 18–30 and 30–40 age cohorts who responded at the lowest rates
• Draft written report and open community forum targeted by end of Q1

The chair also noted that a Department of Mental Health grant application for a MiniMed/micro-MPH program was not submitted due to insufficient time to develop the required collaborative partnerships.

Albert Jordan (Roosevelt Ave) thanked the highway and tree departments for cleanup around the Coffin School but raised concerns about three abandoned vehicles blocking the building and a wooden shed he described as a fire hazard. The chair noted the shed is being taken down.

John Livermore (19 Russell St), Eileen Haley (44 Longview Drive), Michelle Bell (Ocean Ave), and Elaine Lahey (Ida Road) each spoke in support of the municipal energy reduction plan that was to be presented later in the meeting. Speakers cited potential grant funding of $150,000 in the first year and up to $250,000 per subsequent grant cycle, operational cost savings, and alignment with the town’s net-zero-by-2040 goal.

During the open-public-comment period, a resident described the citizen police academy format — weekly Friday sessions over nine to ten weeks with speakers, a courthouse visit, and a police station tour — as analogous to the public mental health education program the board chair had described. Discussion also continued on the transfer station’s metal bin, cardboard and paper recycling markets, and the mechanics of the license plate reader system.

The chair called the meeting to order on October 22, 2025, noted the meeting was being recorded, and opened public comment. No members of the public commented in person or online, and the comment period was closed.

A resident in the audience suggested the board and transfer station director produce a plain-language newspaper article and video explaining how the transfer station works, what materials go where, and why certain items require special handling. The resident noted that many residents do not know that clothing can be donated, that food composting is available, or that certain bulk items require separate handling. The director agreed and noted the town had previously produced MHTV video segments about the transfer station and could revisit that format. The director also noted that clothing donations at the transfer station have reached approximately 80,000 pounds for the first three quarters of the year.

A board member reported on a meeting with a Select Board member, a School Committee member, and Parks & Recreation staff following a recent fatal accident. Proposed responses included introducing ‘arrive alive’ VR goggle demonstrations, requiring parents to attend pre-prom social-hosting education sessions, and enforcing athletic suspensions for students caught drinking.

The board member expressed concern that adult behavior — including parents drinking at high school sporting events and hosting underage parties — is a significant driver of the problem. A resident at the meeting echoed these concerns, citing recent incidents at Glover School, a high school incident, and the Atlantic Avenue fatality, and urged the board to engage younger residents and connect with school resource officers.

The board chair noted that Marblehead is fortunate to have two local newspapers willing to publish public health columns, which the board hopes will raise health literacy among residents. Two recent columns were highlighted for discussion.

The chair opened public comment at the start of the October 9, 2025 meeting. No members of the public came forward and the comment period was closed.

The chair asked whether anyone was present for public comment. With only three people in the room and no public comment, the board moved and seconded adjournment unanimously.

Albert Jordan (Roosevelt Ave.) urged the board not to wait until May town meeting to address MBTA Communities 3A compliance, arguing a special town meeting would allow focused deliberation and avoid the tension he described at prior town meetings. He also raised concerns about older residents’ ability to pay rising tax bills.

Michelle Bell (Ocean Ave.) asked the board to take two steps to qualify Marblehead for Green Community designation: adopting a municipal energy-reduction policy and sending a letter of support to the Light Board for a renewable energy charge.

Albert Jordan returned briefly to oppose the green community push on affordability grounds, citing the $200,000 cost of sustainability staff and questioning the net benefit.

Addie Flynn (Elm St.) warned that an MBTA proposal to add a dedicated bus lane on the LynnWay would reduce the corridor to two lanes, affecting an estimated 41,000–44,000 daily vehicles versus 3,000 daily bus riders. She called on the board to oppose the project and noted a public survey is available online.

Eileen Haley outlined the financial case for Marblehead joining the state’s Green Communities program, noting 298 of 351 Massachusetts communities have enrolled and that the town could access up to $150,000 in year one and $250,000 per subsequent grant cycle. She asked the Select Board to adopt a low/zero-emission vehicle procurement policy, commit to a 20% municipal energy reduction goal over five years, and send a letter of support to the Municipal Light Board requesting it take preparatory steps conditional on the town achieving MBTA 3A compliance.

Albert Jordan expressed support for going green but cautioned that the program requires a ratepayer surcharge on electric bills, that the light rate has not increased in 15 years, and that accepting state funds creates an obligation to repay them if the town exits the program. He encouraged the board to proceed carefully.

During public comment:

• A resident raised concern that the upcoming community health survey, based on voter/town clerk registration lists, would miss residents who are not registered to vote. The director acknowledged the concern and described plans to supplement the postcard mailing with newspaper QR codes, placement at the transfer station, COA outreach, MHTV broadcasts, and rolling bulletin boards.
• The same resident suggested using rolling sign boards to improve recycling schedule awareness and inquired about using the senior real estate tax program for additional clerical help.
• The resident noted difficulty finding the charter draft B on the town website and suggested improving discoverability; the director suggested searching ‘Marblehead Charter Draft B’ in Google.
• The resident asked the board to continue advocating for expansion to a five-member Board of Health.
• Via Zoom, resident Lee asked for the spelling of ‘Bloom for All’ and confirmed the $15,000 annual cost covers four free counseling sessions per user for all residents and employees.

The board chair opened the meeting by addressing the August 19 death of 13-year-old Savannah Gacho, calling it at its root an issue of mental health and substance use — core areas of the Board of Health’s portfolio. Drawing on his background as a pediatric ICU medical director, he described the importance of allowing communities to grieve and share humanity.

The board unanimously approved the following statement:

It is with great sadness that the Board of Health acknowledges the tragic events of August 19th, which led to the death of 13-year-old Savannah Gacho. We extend our deepest sympathies and condolences to Savannah’s family and friends at this time of great pain and suffering. We also recognize the desire of many Marblehead residents for a meaningful response that will reduce the likelihood of similar tragedies in the future. As a board we commit to strengthen our efforts to support mental health in the town and to promote awareness of the consequences of substance abuse in our community, especially for young people.

The chair called the August 13, 2025 meeting to order and opened public comment. No one came forward in person, and no online hands were raised.

The board chair reported on a recent meeting to review sample questions for a community wellness assessment being developed with a consultant from UMass Boston (described as a gerontologist). Seven participants attended, including representatives covering maternal health, senior services, and pediatrics. The new school superintendent also joined and provided substantive input.

The chair noted that school committee chair Al Williams had enthusiastically agreed to explore a formal partnership between the school committee and the Board of Health, and that Kate Schmick-Pepper also participated in an initial conversation. The group worked through roughly half of a 50-question draft survey; a follow-up session was planned to finish pruning the list toward a target of approximately 40 questions. The chair noted a preference to wait until the Republic Services strike concludes before launching the survey publicly, while staying within the consultant’s requirement that analysis be completed by early 2025.

The chair also described an introductory public health literacy presentation given to the local Rotary club and plans to offer a series of sessions at the Council on Aging in the fall.

A resident from 106 Atlantic Avenue expressed support for the Select Board’s handling of MBTA Communities 3A compliance, saying the board was attempting to keep the town out of legal trouble.

A resident from 64 Roosevelt Road raised concerns about the pace of municipal hiring, water and sewer rate increases, transfer station operations serving non-residents, and the lack of full-time highway department staffing.

A resident calling in from 165 Westshore Drive referenced the previous night’s referendum result on Article 23 (3A adoption), noted the narrow margin, and asked the board what its plan was for the July 14 non-compliance deadline and whether the board had contingency plans.

The same resident also objected to proposed roundabout projects, advocating instead for stop signs.

Albert Jordan, a resident at Roosevelt Avenue, addressed the board during public comment. He expressed concern about the recent teacher labor action and its effect on students, noting that children lost approximately 11 school days and attended school during extreme heat. He urged the board to consider adding language to the town administrator’s future contract requiring participation on the school committee’s collective bargaining team, citing Salem’s model where the mayor sits on the school committee.

Albert Jordan commended residents for turnout at the prior day’s election and expressed hope that the school department would closely review its budget going forward. He also raised concern about a Board of Health position reported in a local paper, noting a hiring freeze was in place, and suggested the town consider privatizing solid waste operations or exploring arrangements like the South Essex Sewer Authority model.

Chair Schaffner read two letters of commendation received by the committee. The first, from the ADL New England dated May 20, expressed gratitude for the vote condemning MTA antisemitic teaching materials and connected the action to concerns about rising antisemitism following a shooting at the Capital Jewish Museum. The second, from CAMERA CEO Kurt Schwartz dated June 4, similarly praised the committee’s moral clarity and offered organizational support going forward.

The chair also noted for the record that while the vote on the proclamation was 3-2, all five members of the Marblehead School Committee subsequently signed the resolution.

Four community members — Kristen Binder, Karen Telmelka, Sarah Palladian, Carl Goodman (via Zoom), and Elm (West Shore Drive) — thanked committee members Jen Schaffner, Sarah Fox, and Allison Taylor for voting to approve a proclamation condemning Massachusetts Teachers Association curricular materials they described as antisemitic. Several speakers expressed disappointment that the vote was 3-2 rather than unanimous and called on the two dissenting members to reconsider.

A fifth speaker, Jonathan Heller (26 Ralph Road), a 19-year educator in the district, referenced a recent student suicide in a neighboring community and asked the committee to prioritize student mental health, specifically requesting the addition of school social workers and a formal committee proclamation on mental health. Committee Chair Schaffner asked the superintendent to provide a future report on mental health staffing levels.

Nick Ward (6 Ton Road) argued that the primary motivation behind the citizen petition was concern that residents lacked the opportunity to vote at town meeting, and urged the Select Board to make every voting avenue available — at minimum mail-in ballots and ideally early in-person voting.

A board member responded that mail-in voting is now available by default and that the Board of Registrars is meeting the following week to decide whether early voting will be offered for the June 10 election, with the special election question also referred to them.

Megan (remote) suggested the Select Board could have filed an exemption with the state regarding Article 3 and thanked the board and town clerk for ensuring a fair vote.

John (6th Grade Road) raised two legal issues:

1. Polling hours — Chapter 405 of the Acts of 1954 states polls shall close no earlier than 8 PM but does not preclude later hours; he urged the board to keep polls open until 10 PM given the preceding holiday week.
2. Vote threshold — He argued there is no case law definitively interpreting whether the threshold to reverse a town meeting vote requires both a majority of voters and at least 20% of registered voters. He proposed a compromise of 15% (roughly 825 fewer votes than 20%) applicable only to this ballot question to avoid potential declaratory-judgment litigation that he estimated could delay a result until late 2025.

Albert Jordan of 64 Roosevelt Avenue spoke during public comment on several topics:

• Town Meeting venue: Jordan advocated for holding future town meetings at the new high school, citing better accessibility, ventilation, exits, and comfort compared to the old high school auditorium.
• Coffin School property: He urged the board not to let the property sit vacant for years, suggesting the incoming board act within three to six months.
• Police car color: Jordan suggested changing police cars from all-black to a more visible black-and-white or white-and-blue scheme, noting he plans to meet with the town administrator on the topic before the next board is seated.
• Town vehicle take-home policy: He raised concerns about department heads taking town vehicles home out of town and asked whether proper tax reporting is being done, noting he would bring relevant state forms to the town administrator.

Multiple residents spoke during public comment, primarily about the pending flag and banner policy (Policy IMDB):

• Margaret Clark (29 Bamford St.) argued the policy substitutes board control for administrative trust, questioned the ‘political vs. controversial’ distinction, and urged the committee not to censor flags.
• Angus McQuilkin (39 Ty Lane) contended no policy was ever needed, criticized the list of six heritage months as excluding Greek, Jewish, Arab, and other heritages, noted the absence of federal holidays such as Juneteenth, and pointed out the policy says nothing about teacher and staff free-expression rights.
• Chris Bruhl (online) stated he and his wife, both cisgendered and heterosexual, were offended by a prior committee member’s reference to ‘religious traditional family values,’ and said opposition to the flag policy extends beyond LGBTQ+ families.
• Renee King asked how the committee would define ‘viewpoint neutral,’ raised questions about who decides what constitutes a political or activist organization, and expressed concern that the policy politicizes the school committee.
• Cindy Tower Lowen (12 Trinity Rd.) asked whether the committee had consulted METCO headquarters or other METCO-district school committees before drafting the policy, and whether permanently removing the Black Lives Matter banner would be welcoming to the roughly 50 Boston METCO students.
• Mary McCarrison (Pinecliff Dr.) raised questions about the book review policy and the recess/WIN block schedule.
• Jeannie Lampkin (Devereux St.) noted passive voice in the policy draft, pointed to a welcome mat with LGBTQ+ and diversity symbols already displayed at the school entrance as an example of the ambiguity the policy creates, provided a list of ~40 heritage months, and asked the committee to replace the tattered flag out front—which the superintendent later confirmed was being replaced.

The chair opened the floor for public comment. No speakers came forward and the meeting was adjourned.

A resident attending the meeting noted the new traffic pattern at the transfer station appeared to be working well and praised the facility improvements. The resident urged the board to take photographs of the new compactor, tipping floor, and control booth before town meeting, arguing that most residents—estimated at 90%—have limited awareness of transfer station operations and improvements. The director noted that between 6,000 and 7,000 stickers are sold annually and that roughly 1,000 visits per day occur at the facility. The board acknowledged the need to better publicize the transfer station’s capabilities, including clothes recycling, book drop-off, and other services listed in the annual report.

A representative of the Marblehead Municipal Employees Union addressed the board, stating that the Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations had issued pre-complaints after finding credible information supporting surface bargaining and bad faith bargaining by the town’s bargaining team as of April 2024, with two additional complaints filed more recently. The speaker noted that three unresolved municipal union contracts require funding at town meeting, now approximately 10 days away, and cited MGL Chapter 150E Section 7B1 requiring the employer to submit agreements to the legislative body within 30 days of execution.

A second resident, Jordan Roosevelt, raised concerns about new town positions being created — including a transfer station role reportedly paying approximately $90,000 — while existing contracts remain unsettled. He also commented on vacancies at the electric light department, and advocated for a hiring freeze until contracts are resolved.

Six speakers addressed the committee during public comment, all focused on the proposed flag and banner policy.

• A middle school student argued that removing symbolic displays would harm the educational environment and suggested a student poll.
• Margaret Clark (29 Mulford Street) raised procedural concerns including lack of broad parent notification, absence of approved meeting minutes, and argued the policy’s scope was broader than its agenda description.
• Nyla (online) proposed adding explicit viewpoint-neutrality language with three criteria: values-based, curriculum-based, and viewpoint neutral.
• Angus McQuilkin (39 Lane) raised three concerns: language about symbolic displays had not been removed despite a prior committee motion; a prohibition on third-party petitions remains and may be unconstitutional; and teachers who refuse to comply may face discipline.
• Aaron Opperman (14 Anderson Street), identifying as a constitutional lawyer and queer parent, argued the policy is premature, legally problematic under the First Amendment, and that no flag policy was necessary.
• Audrey House (12 Lincoln Park) asked the committee to table the policy, arguing the existing legal framework does not require blanket suppression.
• Diane Gora (24 Nicholson Street) asked what justification the committee had for removing enforcement authority from school administration.

The chair invited online attendees to raise their hand for public comment. No one came forward and the meeting moved directly to the Town Administrator update.

A board member providing a ‘Creating a Healthier Marblehead’ (COMM) update reported the initiative has reached approximately 50% of its fundraising target. Recent outreach included meetings with Marblehead Pediatrics, the Female Humane Society, and the Marblehead Ministerial Association. A presentation to the Select Board is planned, pending scheduling after Town Meeting.

The board discussed current MMR vaccine guidance, including the option to vaccinate children as young as six months when traveling to high-risk areas, with the caveat that an early dose requires a third shot. A board member noted a planned future presentation on measles ‘immune amnesia’—a condition in which active measles infection can deplete prior immune protection in a subset of individuals.

Regarding the Marblehead Mental Health Task Force, a meeting with the Marblehead Counseling Center was scheduled for the coming week to explore a closer partnership.

Public comment drew approximately 13 in-person speakers and at least one online speaker. Key themes:

Flag policy opponents argued the draft policy’s ‘symbolic displays’ language was overbroad, covering clothing, logos, religious symbols, and student artwork; that no statutory requirement for such a policy exists; that the no-third-party-petition clause was unconstitutional; and that the policy infringed on teacher and student First Amendment rights. Speakers referenced the collective bargaining agreement and compared the draft unfavorably to existing town and Housing Authority flag policies.

Flag policy supporters argued the policy would promote school neutrality and prevent selective flag display; noted that the Israeli flag had been removed from the high school cafeteria while other flags remained; and said the policy was necessary to prevent students from feeling excluded.

Antisemitism investigation speakers expressed dismay that most allegations were not corroborated, argued the investigator should have applied the IHRA definition of antisemitism exclusively, and described personal experiences of antisemitism in Marblehead. One speaker announced she was running for school committee. Another speaker, a 2018 MHS graduate, defended the teacher at the center of allegations.

A resident opened public comment by raising concerns about large signs being carried in public buildings, citing safety and fire-code access issues. The resident also questioned the pace of new administrative hires given budget constraints, suggested using existing employees on stipends rather than new full-time positions, and expressed concern about housing affordability for longtime residents as property values rise.

A resident physician offered public comment reinforcing the importance of communicating uncertainty during public health events, quoting former NIH Director Francis Collins’s self-criticism that public health officials “failed to say every time we made a recommendation, guys, this is the best we can do right now, there is a good chance that this is wrong.”

The town moderator joined remotely and made two requests for town meeting:

1. A brief update on the transfer station construction project under Article 2 (reports from boards and committees).
2. That the Board of Health hold its budget line item and make a presentation at town meeting given the significant upcoming contract changes.

A resident also raised the topic of single-stream recycling, suggesting that separating recyclables by type (as done at the transfer station drop-off) produces a more valuable commodity. The director confirmed this is accurate but noted that state recycling mandates and curbside collection contracts make a return to dual-stream difficult.

The meeting was adjourned unanimously.

Public comment ran well beyond the 15-minute limit and was extended by a 4-0 vote. Speakers included:

• Kira Kay (Pickwick Road) questioned why the proposed policy had not changed despite community opposition, a student alternative, and a statement from the state Commissioner of Education emphasizing inclusive school environments.
• Liv Niles (MHS junior) described a student-authored alternative policy vetted by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), and reported that 103 of 109 students surveyed said students should have a voice in flag policy decisions.
• Margaret Carter (Fer Street) challenged the legal rationale, questioned enforcement practicality, and asked the committee to release the specific legal language requiring the restrictive approach.
• Renee Ramirez-Keeny (Beverly Ave) shared clinical stories from her career as a social worker to illustrate the developmental importance of symbols of inclusion for children.
• Brent Speed (Gerald Road, attorney) argued that longstanding Supreme Court precedent allows schools to regulate student speech without a blanket ban, and warned the current draft may itself expose the district to First Amendment claims.
• Kathleen Terren (Devereaux Ave, remote) expressed concern that the policy signals distrust in educators and does not support marginalized students.
• Angus McLoan (Tyson Lane) called the policy “policy by political objective,” argued the third-party petition ban is unconstitutional, and recommended tabling the policy indefinitely or adopting the student-drafted alternative.
• Jeanie Lampkin (remote) urged the committee to consider long-term legacy and the developmental needs of high school students.
• Henry Gusto (Mohawk Road) connected the third graders’ leadership presentation to the values at stake in the flag policy debate and urged adoption of the student policy.

The chair opened the floor for public comment. No one in the audience or online came forward. The meeting adjourned at 8:05 PM.

During online public comment, Mr. Cantor asked the committee two questions: (1) whether the approximately $947,000 federal funding line item in FY26 and FY27 budgets was at risk given federal-level uncertainty, and (2) whether the committee had considered creating its own Facebook group to post agenda materials proactively. The chair noted that both topics would be addressed later in the meeting.

Three residents commented during public comment:

1. Online participant asked for clarification on the Mental Health Task Force’s status. The board clarified it is not disbanding but evolving; the task force has not taken formal action and is awaiting board direction before the chair schedules another meeting.

2. Same participant asked about measles booster recommendations given the New Jersey outbreak. The board deferred to state guidance; one member relayed that an infectious disease physician at Beverly Hospital indicated adults do not need a booster unless traveling to an affected area.

3. In-room resident and Diane Gora (24 Nicholson Street, via Zoom) raised website usability issues: outdated fee information on the briefly-live new site (showing $80 sticker fee instead of current $100), difficulty finding meeting agendas and a master calendar, and a request that posted notices include the date posted for clarity. Director Petty acknowledged the issues and committed to addressing them before relaunch.

Albert Jordan of Roosevelt Avenue addressed the board during public comment, suggesting GPS tracking on police cruisers similar to state police practice, and urging the board to explore removing the Marblehead Police Department from civil service. He cited Swampscott as a local example and expressed concern about future costs if no structural changes are made.

Several public comments were addressed:

• A resident asked how to access meeting minutes; the health director explained they are posted on the town website under Board of Health by calendar year.
• A resident suggested the board collect and compare tobacco and body art regulations from neighboring communities to demonstrate legal cost duplication to state legislators.
• A resident asked about the board’s response to correspondence from Megan Sweeney regarding federal actions affecting transgender health data. The board discussed that Massachusetts-level protections remain in place and that Marblehead does not collect the type of demographic health data described. The board declined to issue a formal statement mirroring Salem’s language but noted it continues to make science-based decisions.

The chair opened the meeting and invited public comment. No attendees came forward in person or raised hands online.

A resident identified as Heather asked whether Marblehead had considered prohibiting tobacco sales to anyone born in or after 2000, referencing a similar policy in Brookline. The director indicated the board would consider such options when reviewing tobacco regulations.

Amanda Lori, a reporter with the Daily Item new to Marblehead, asked about the financial impact of the compactor being down (~$4,500/day in lost commercial revenue), the total FY26 budget, and whether the budget is level-funded. The director explained the waste budget cannot be level-funded due to a 3% annual contractual increase, and provided a copy of the budget document.

The board discussed postponing a planned community substance abuse awareness night, originally set for March, to late spring when eighth graders transition to the high school. A board member noted meeting with the acting superintendent to explore scheduling a drug-themed theater production, potentially piggybacking on a Swampscott production. Concerns were raised about event costs, board coordination, and budgeting for programs not yet formally approved.

Several residents addressed the board during the Q&A portion:

Jim Regis (1 Lee Street) raised three issues: (1) the Municipal Light Department contributing $360K to the town budget while light poles in disrepair; (2) whether school buildings should come under town management given the high school roof/HVAC cost escalation; (3) concern that projected 5% expense growth vs. 2.5% revenue growth creates a compounding gap, and that authorized-but-unborrowed debt is not fully reflected in the fiscal picture.

Albert Jordan (Roosevelt Avenue) expressed concern about the cumulative impact of raises, fee increases, and health insurance costs on fixed-income elderly residents, specifically those on social security or small pensions.

Christine Nuccio (3 Dams Way) asked how short-term rental (Airbnb) compliance is tracked. Staff responded that approximately 400+ are registered with the state; the new Community Development and Planning department will inventory the full scope and evaluate possible regulations.

Lee Lander (West Port Lane) sought clarification on the distinction between a general override and a debt exclusion override, and asked when residents will know what debt exclusions may be requested. Staff confirmed the warrant hearing (approximately April 10) is when FinCom votes recommendations; specific project costs (e.g., Mary Alley) are pending engineering reports.

Jonathan Hiller (Ralph Road) asked about the timeline for citizens to learn what debt exclusions will be proposed before town meeting; staff confirmed articles are listed in Select Board warrant discussions and finalized at the warrant hearing.

High school roof discussion: A resident questioned the cost increase from the original ~$5M estimate to approximately $8.8M (roof alone) or ~$14M (roof plus HVAC). Mike (school facilities representative) explained the original estimate was informal, no paid feasibility study was conducted, and the increased scope reflects removal and replacement of all rooftop mechanical equipment plus inflationary escalation for a project now targeted for the following summer.

David Patton (Lee Street) asked about MBTA Communities grant exposure: CFO confirmed no grant revenues are pre-budgeted, and that the state had withheld contract signing until January pending the zoning vote; future grant applications could be affected if the zoning article does not pass.

The chair called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM and opened public comment. No members of the public were present in the room or online to speak.

During public comment, a resident praised transfer station employee Marty and raised ongoing dog waste issues observed on daily walks through town, noting a neighbor had self-funded a waste station at Crocker Park. The resident also suggested the Essex Tech vocational school could be engaged for transfer station construction projects such as the swap shop, as has been done in other communities. The DPW director acknowledged this as a possibility for future phases while noting schedule constraints in an active facility.

The health director noted elevated levels of norovirus and COVID-19 in the community and encouraged residents to wash hands, stay home when sick, and wear masks. COVID rapid test kits are available at the health department office (state-funded) and distributed to the Council on Aging. A board member noted that kits cost approximately $8 each online.

The director indicated that an opinion from town counsel on the Swan’s Squad matter — regarding the respective responsibilities of the Board of Health and the department — had not yet been received. The item was tabled to the next meeting.

Dr. Zaro reported that the Marblehead Mental Health Task Force, co-led by Dr. Labon and Joanne Miller, continues to grow, with 17 participants at its most recent meeting. The task force does not provide direct clinical services but serves as a coordination and education body.

The Board of Health has begun fundraising to secure a contract with UMass Boston for a community health assessment study, estimated to cost $45,000, with plans to begin the study in spring. The Marblehead Rotary Club subsequently announced a $10,000 donation toward the effort during public comment.

A representative of the Marblehead Counseling Center (MCC) provided the annual update to the board. Key figures from 2024:

• Approximately 400 clients served, 53% from Marblehead, for roughly 7,000 clinical hours
• Current wait list: 235 individuals, approximately 43% (about 100 people) from Marblehead; roughly 25 are children
• Wait list breakdown: 10 from 2025, 105 from 2024, 121 from 2023

Staffing: 7 licensed clinicians, 2 master’s-level graduate students working toward licensure (supported by a Cummings Foundation grant), and 1 intern from Salem State. One additional licensed clinician position is being recruited.

Facilities: First-floor renovations at the Hobbs building were completed in May, creating a HIPAA-compliant reception area. A new boiler was installed with ARPA funds. A former kitchen area is being converted to group meeting space; the back porch egress project is pending.

Funding request: The board currently allocates approximately $60,000; MCC is requesting restoration to the prior level of $120,000 for FY26.

The center also reported that social services staff helped divert 14 evictions in 2024 and served over 200 clients for social services needs. A new case manager, Catherine Percy, was recently hired.

No members of the public — in-person or online — came forward during the public comment period. Student representative Ella reported that classes had resumed smoothly, the senior show is January 12 at 3:00 PM ($20 students/$25 non-students), the varsity girls basketball team plays at TD Garden on Saturday at 11:30 AM, the musical this year will be Hades Town with auditions January 15, parent yearbook dedications are due February 15, and junior seminars begin the following week with a parent/guardian night on January 15 at 6:00 PM.

Albert Jordan (Roosevelt Avenue) expressed opposition to a potential property tax override, arguing that many older residents on fixed incomes cannot afford higher taxes, and suggested the town form a residents’ committee to identify cost savings.

Nick Ward (Rollon Road) summarized the SJC’s same-day ruling in the Milton case, noting it upheld the Attorney General’s enforcement authority but found the EOHLC guidelines were improperly promulgated. He urged the board not to rush into compliance with any emergency regulations, arguing that the three-to-six month regulatory re-promulgation window gives housing advocates time to catalog towns’ attempts at ‘paper compliance’ and push for tighter final regulations. He also argued that market-rate multifamily housing increases affordability in an absolute sense even without below-market subsidies.

Deborah Noah, a parent and Hebrew school teacher at Congregation Shirat Hayam, said scheduling makeup days on Saturdays would be offensive given that Sundays were not offered out of respect for the Christian Sabbath. She also questioned why only parents had not been the sole survey respondents.

Yael (last name not provided), a parent with children at the high school and Veterans School, suggested that if weekend days were required, they should be divided equally between Saturdays and Sundays. She also raised concerns about what she described as union agendas affecting Jewish teachers and students.

Rabbi Michael Schwartz emphasized the personal impact on individual students, citing the example of a bar mitzvah candidate whose celebration could be disrupted, and suggested shorter April break or added end-of-year days as alternatives.

Janice Knight, Director of Jewish Education at Congregation Shirat in Swampscott and a Marblehead resident, said 40% of her Saturday morning program’s students are Marblehead residents and that losing five Saturdays would significantly harm her program.

The chair invited public comment both in-person and online. No members of the public came forward to speak.

During the public comment period, one resident asked for clarification on the cashless payment transition and noted he had observed residents and others improperly disposing of materials in the recycling dumpsters. The health director confirmed that license plate reader (LPR) cameras, once installed, will be used to identify illegal dumping and issue fines. The board adjourned at approximately 9:55 p.m.

Resident John DePi, whose hand had been raised during public comment, was recognized after the chair reconvened the meeting. He characterized the work stoppage as an illegal strike by civil servants, described coordinated action among Marblehead, Beverly, and Gloucester teacher unions, and stated his family had moved their child to private school. He cited a figure of 77 Marblehead families reportedly moving to private schools and said the MEA’s rhetoric had been dangerous. He called on MEA officers John Van, Sally, Hannah Hood, and Allison Carey to issue a public apology, stating that such an apology would be necessary for any override to have a meaningful chance of passing. His remarks were interrupted by off-mic voices before the chair closed public comment and adjourned at 8:08 PM.

• Daniel Rosen (31 E Street) asked the school committee, union, and town to undertake a formal lessons-learned process following superintendent contract disputes, citing his 25 years of project management experience.
• Mary McCarrison (Pinecliff Drive) thanked committee members and staff for securing livable wages and safe schools.
• Samantha Rosado (Martin Terrace) expressed frustration that a high school roof project approved at town meeting in 2022 for approximately $4 million has grown to approximately $11 million and now requires an override, and noted ongoing mold concerns.
• Kate Thompson (Booba Road) stated the facilities subcommittee had not met in over a year, asked for documentation of FY25 budget requests, and called on Sarah Fox to step down as chair of the facilities subcommittee, also characterizing an email she received from Fox as personally offensive.

Albert Jordan of Roosevelt Avenue thanked whoever resolved the issue of library lights remaining on around the clock, and noted that Peabody received a state grant of over $200,000 for energy efficiency in public buildings, suggesting Marblehead pursue similar funding.

He also expressed strong criticism of the recent teachers’ strike, arguing that striking public employees should forfeit pay from day one, that teachers who caused 11 missed school days should work those days without compensation, and that union members should not picket near town meeting entrances.

Multiple residents addressed the Select Board during public comment:

• Mary Leblanc (30 Peach Highlands), literacy coach and teacher: Called on the community to support fair wages, parental leave, and bereavement leave, and urged the school committee and town administrator to settle the contract immediately.
• John Wales (8 Jefferson Street): Described an emergency motion for injunctive relief filed in Lawrence Superior Court on behalf of a diverse group of Marblehead High School students, seeking to allow extracurricular activities and sports to continue during the work stoppage. He cited a playoff football game, a cheer competition, a performing arts senior showcase, and a state cross country meet with college scouts attending as events at risk. He referenced Beverly schools as a comparable district allowing activities to proceed.
• Jane Kassler (199 Washington Street): Raised the MBTA Communities Act, noting the December 31 compliance deadline, the town’s prior vote against compliance, and potential penalties including loss of state grants and possible action by the Attorney General.
• Catherine Wilmont Sullivan, school adjustment counselor at Glover School: Described low morale, staff departures, and the loss of special educators at Village School (10 special educators this year), urging the board to act on the contract and the override.
• Jen Billings (67 Atlantic Avenue), English teacher at Marblehead High School: Stated that mediation has not produced results and accused the school committee of making no substantive counter-proposals. She cited paraprofessional starting wages of $16–$17 per hour and called for face-to-face bargaining.

Dr. Coyle, director of a research center within UMass Boston’s Gerontology Institute, presented a community health needs assessment proposal for Marblehead. Key elements include:

• Document and existing data review, including a demographic profile from American Community Survey data
• Three focus groups targeting specific community voices, including potentially families with children under 18
• Survey of ~16,000 residents age 18+ via postcard driving respondents to an online survey, with paper and phone options; approximately 1,600 responses (10%) expected
• Approximately 40–45 questions, taking respondents roughly 15 minutes to complete
• Timeline: Kickoff and IRB approval in late spring 2025; focus groups and survey development summer 2025; survey distribution September 2025; final report by approximately March 2026
• Cost: $40,000–$45,000

Topics expected to emerge include financial security, mental health and stress, substance misuse, caregiving, and health promotion activities. The board noted Swampscott achieved a 33% response rate by mailing physical surveys to residents age 60+, and set an informal goal of exceeding 35%.

The board discussed forming a steering committee of strategic stakeholder partners before the June kickoff, with a smaller subgroup to review survey design. The board also discussed fundraising, noting approximately $8,000 in Mental Health Task Force funds as a starting point.

The board voted unanimously to proceed with the project.

Resident Albert Jordan, 64 Roosevelt Avenue, addressed the board with concerns about energy waste at town facilities, citing lights left on overnight at the new library and school buildings. He said he had raised the issue with the library director and other officials without resolution and suggested the board establish a subcommittee to receive public input on cost-saving ideas, noting he had found Finance Committee meetings unreceptive to public questions.

Seven speakers addressed the committee during public comment, representing the Marblehead Education Association and individual educators:

• Jonathan Heller (MEA Co-President, 26 Ralph Road) read a letter signed by over 700 people — 70% Marblehead residents and educators — calling for competitive wages, modern parental leave, minimum-wage compliance for hourly workers, and a safety commitment.
• Hannah Partica (Glover School kindergarten teacher) described commuting 1,200 hours per year because she cannot afford to live closer on her current salary, and said she does not know how much longer she can stay.
• Laura Gellan (Village School therapeutic teacher) reported being hit, punched, kicked, spit on, and suffering a broken nose; stated Village School has lost nine special-ed staff since last year and cannot hire qualified replacements because McDonald’s and Starbucks pay more than tutors and paraprofessionals.
• Jenny Wilkins (teacher and parent of three MPS students) corroborated the safety concerns, saying she broke her kneecap and that short-staffing creates a domino effect of crises.
• Allison Carey (MHS social worker, reading on behalf of Kate Kelly, Spanish teacher) described a complicated pregnancy with only 21 paid days of leave, during which her son was born with a cleft lip and she was diagnosed with cholestasis.
• Megan Kelvin (MEA educator/parent) detailed a contractual salary-schedule cap that limits school nurses to no higher than step 9 / lane M, creating a greater-than-$13,000 gap versus other Unit A members, and said a proposal to remedy it would cost the district $0 today.
• Bill Shaw (22-year Vets teacher, 17 Brookhouse Drive) expressed concern that bargaining sessions are adversarial and dominated by the school committee’s outside legal counsel, Attorney Elizabeth Valerio, and urged the committee to work with teachers rather than against them.
• Michael Fu (MHS computer-science/math teacher, 43 Smith Street) cited $403,000 in legal fees paid over 18 months and asked the committee to reconsider its legal-counsel approach; he noted that educators rejected proposals for modern parental leave and bereavement leave including pregnancy loss.
• Alex Jimenez (parent, 6 Legs Hill Road) urged the committee to support salary increases and offered to participate in fundraising or other community efforts to help address the financial shortfall.

The chair called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM and solicited public comment. No members of the public were present at the microphone and no one was online, so the board proceeded directly to administrator updates.

A member of the public asked two questions:

1. The total transfer station project budget was confirmed at approximately $1.55 million.
2. Whether any of the $90,000 Best Practices grant could be redirected to fund the $35,000 community health assessment — the answer was no, as the grant has specific designated uses. The board noted that additional grant sources are being explored and community fundraising is a possibility, though a formal approach to the select board for funding is unlikely in the near term.

A board member described the third annual Marblehead Mental Health 5K scheduled for Sunday, November 3rd (daylight saving time), starting and finishing at the Boston Yacht Club, organized by the Rotary Club. Proceeds support the Inner Explore mindfulness program in Marblehead schools. The member offered a personal incentive: an additional $20 donation for each participant who beats his prior year time, up to $500, with a $500 bonus if Congressman Seth Moulton participates and beats his time.

Ron Knight, commander of the Chaplain Lyman Rollins VFW Post 2005 at 321 West Shore Drive, thanked the board for its prior permit approval and reported the Run Rucker Walk raised over $9,000 for Company to Heroes. He presented the board with challenge coins commemorating the VFW’s 125th anniversary and invited members to a free brunch for veterans on the upcoming Sunday.

Albert Jordan of Roosevelt Avenue raised two concerns. He argued that taxpayers who missed the abatement window following errors in the assessor’s office should be given relief through special legislation, and praised the town’s newly hired assessor. He also detailed longstanding maintenance issues at Waterside Cemetery — including fallen tree limbs on graves, broken water facilities not repaired for months, and a lack of recognition for a retiring 30-year employee — and suggested the cemetery superintendent position be placed under the town administrator’s oversight.

Sally Shery addressed the committee, honoring Catherine Martin for her service and mourning the 2022 loss of Glover teacher Brooke Yano after more than 15 years of service. She noted that requests for memorials — a library, plaque, or bench — had been told they conflicted with school committee policy, and urged the committee to revise that policy so memorials could be established for both educators.

Residents addressed the board during public comment. A selection of views expressed:

• A resident from Pond Street raised concern about up to 1,200 additional cars from potential development and suggested an environmental legal challenge.
• Nick Ward (Rolleston Road) supported 3A zoning, citing the town’s projected $10 million operating deficit by 2029 and a Milton planning study showing a positive budget contribution of $350,000–$1 million annually from 3A zoning.
• A resident calling in online compared the state’s position to tyranny and noted Marblehead’s limited transit infrastructure.
• Bill Keeny (Beverly Ave.) said he supported the compliance plan and the special meeting proposal, but respected the board’s decision not to proceed.
• Lori Barnum (West Shore Drive) cited cumulative traffic impacts over 28 years as her primary opposition.
• John DiPipano (Trager Road) thanked the board for not proceeding and described efforts to negotiate unit counts down, citing Topsfield’s reduction from 750 to 118 units.
• A resident from Nashua Avenue suggested the town may already meet density requirements and urged a negotiation approach.
• Trevor Moore (Redstone Lane) noted that unfunded infrastructure projects would ultimately be paid through taxes.
• Sarah Fox (Beach Street) described the town’s budget situation as a fixed-pot math problem, noting that without additional revenue sources, service or staffing cuts are the only alternative.
• A resident from Mohawk Road raised concerns about town financial management practices.
• Kurt James (Norman Street) encouraged residents to engage with the Housing Committee, which meets monthly.

Public comment ran approximately 45 minutes with more than a dozen speakers split between opposing and supporting a special town meeting to reconsider the MBTA Communities Act zoning article.

Opponents argued the article had been voted down twice — once on the merits and once on a motion for reconsideration — and that convening a special town meeting would undermine Marblehead’s town-meeting tradition. One speaker read aloud what he described as a personal email from the board chair promoting the Marblehead Housing Coalition and alleged possible Open Meeting Law concerns. Several residents contended the zoning overlay would enable up to 900 new units, most of which would not be affordable.

Supporters argued the planning board produced a careful, measured overlay plan; that the December 31, 2024 compliance deadline creates real financial risk; and that many residents were confused or absent on the second night of town meeting when the article narrowly failed by 33 votes. One speaker identified himself as a founding member of the Marblehead Housing Coalition and disputed characterizations of the group’s membership. Another noted environmental and fiscal benefits of denser housing near transit.

The chair responded to “personal attacks” by stating she has publicly supported housing solutions since her campaign and that the board had adopted a Housing Production Plan in 2021.

Resident Mr. Jordan addressed the board and Police Chief King regarding two recent incidents: a high-speed chase near a beach area and a tasing incident in which a resident was reportedly tased in the back. He questioned whether the suspended officer would be retrained before being issued a taser again and expressed concern about liability and public safety.

A resident asked whether the closed trash trailers could be retrofitted with sprinkler ports following the July fire. The director explained that closed trailers limit oxygen and tend to self-suppress smoldering fires, and that he would follow up with CWT.

Another resident noted new bulletin boards appearing at beaches and asked about their purpose. The director explained these are state-required sanitary sewer overflow notification boards funded by a state grant, installed at approximately 10 locations, and will also carry bathing beach closure and dog-on-beach information going forward.

A resident also mentioned informally assisting with storm debris cleanup and delivering material to the transfer station, which the director confirmed is welcome and consistent with how the department works with community volunteers cleaning up neighborhood beaches and fishing areas.

No members of the public appeared in person or online to offer public comment.

Albert Jordan (Roosevelt Street) addressed the board on three topics:

1. Veterans agent: Urged preference for a local candidate who can provide after-hours and weekend support as past agents have done.

2. Fireworks barge fire: Suggested the town require inspection of barges before they are moored, noting millions of dollars in nearby boat property and the luck that the fire occurred at 1:30 AM.

3. Property tax billing: Criticized the assessor’s office for repeated billing errors, noting that some residents paid incorrect amounts or missed abatement deadlines because they assumed errors were not correctable. He called for the assessor’s office to hold public meetings in a publicly accessible space with video recording.

Social media and gun violence (board member, not public): The chair noted U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murphy’s statements comparing social media addiction to cigarettes and declaring gun violence a public health crisis. She suggested Andrew work with the school health coordinator to add related questions to student surveys.

Opioid settlement funds (resident): A resident asked about the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Purdue Pharma/Sackler settlement and whether the approximately $110,000 received by the town (with several thousand already spent on Narcan boxes) would need to be returned. The director said he would check with town counsel. The resident also noted that community input is required before spending opioid funds; the director referenced a committee established by the select board and mentioned a survey used by Swampscott as a potential model.

HAWK partnership (Terry Toro, 113 Jersey St.): President of the Marblehead Municipal Employees Union described a pilot program training union members as HAWK domestic violence liaisons. Approximately 50 people trained across two sessions; at least 10 union members in domestic violence situations have been connected to HAWK services. Program is being expanded statewide through the AFL-CIO.

Transfer station (resident): A resident praised the flag disposal bin, suggested engaging the vocational school for the prefab buildings, and urged stronger enforcement of non-resident disposal fees.

School committee clarification (Allison Taylor, 285 West Shore Dr., school committee vice chair, via phone): Clarified that the school committee does provide bills online in meeting packets, votes on them in public session, and the chair signs by hand — responding to earlier discussion comparing board practices.

Director of Community Based Services Ella Serta and site director Hannah Gagne presented on the YWCA North Shore Rape Crisis Center’s services. The organization provides:

• Free, confidential individual counseling for survivors age 12 and up and non-offending family members
• 24/7/365 crisis hotline
• In-person hospital accompaniment for evidence collection (rape kits) at SANE-certified hospitals including Salem, Beverly, Addison Gilbert, and Anna Jacques
• Court and police accompaniment
• Prevention presentations in schools, including quarterly sessions at Marblehead High School with health teacher Carlos Selo, expanded this year from seniors to include freshmen

Topics covered in school presentations include consent, healthy vs. unhealthy relationships, bystander intervention, and sexual violence resources. The organization also works with inmates at Middleton and Essex Correctional Facility under PREA.

Funding comes primarily from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The board discussed adding YWCA information to the town’s redesigned website and noted the organization is not currently listed there.

One resident, Albert Jordan of Roosevelt Street, raised several concerns during public comment:

• Department head contracts: Asked the HR director to include 90-day termination clauses in future department head contracts so the town is not obligated to pay individuals who are not working.
• Outdoor dining: Expressed opposition to allowing tables on sidewalks, noting accessibility issues for elderly residents navigating around Jersey barriers. Described parking scarcity on School Street near Five Corners and questioned why businesses without private parking are permitted to use public space.
• School incidents: Referenced news reports about repeated restraint incidents involving a child at Glover School and suggested police and fire departments should be more involved in evaluating school situations.
• Gas heaters: Asked whether outdoor gas heaters would be permitted at the Barman during cooler months, citing safety concerns.

The chair opened the June 26 meeting with extended remarks acknowledging formal complaints of harassment and discrimination raised at a recent school committee meeting. She noted the complaints are under independent investigation and expressed concern for the town’s Jewish community, citing fear and generational trauma described by Jewish residents. She referenced the American Jewish Committee’s guide on distinguishing anti-Israel political speech from antisemitism and urged residents to speak out against antisemitic incidents. She also noted that Police Chief Dennis King would receive the Stall Award from the Jewish Community Center, reportedly the first non-Jewish community leader to receive the honor.

A large crowd — requiring overflow seating in the auditorium — signed up to speak during public comment, which extended well beyond the usual 15-minute limit.

Speakers defending World Language Department teachers included teacher Elmer Magana (18 years at MHS), French teacher Mary Francois, Spanish teacher Laura Alvarez, Latin teacher Dena Nguyen (read by proxy), clinical social worker Judy Louise, consultant Dr. Nicole Scher (read by proxy), school counselor Meredith Rearden, and Deacon John Whipple of the Marblehead Task Force Against Discrimination. They categorically denied antisemitism allegations and described accused teacher Candace Liney as a dedicated anti-discrimination advocate and longtime Team Harmony advisor.

Speakers alleging antisemitism and requesting an independent investigation included teacher Mindy Greenberg, who stated she is leaving the district due to a hostile work environment and that district grievance procedures were not followed after her April 2022 complaint; teacher Jit Kanes; parent and Israeli-American Yael McGinn; sophomore David McGinn, who described identifying antisemitic content in a World Cultures class handout that was subsequently corrected; parent Deborah Noah; parent Sarah Palladian; parent Karen Taal; Lindsay Ne Parsec; Rabbi Yossi Lipski; Rabbi Michael Ragin (urging use of the IHRA definition of antisemitism); and antisemitism-summit organizer Nait Friedlander.

Other speakers included resident Ellan Talguy and resident Judith Drachman, who argued that political activism — on any side — should be kept out of school; and Greg Colts, who provided context on the Israeli flag dispute.

Many speakers called for: (1) an independent investigation conducted by an organization experienced in antisemitism; (2) use of the IHRA definition and examples; (3) Jewish community input in vetting the investigative organization; (4) investigation of antisemitic incidents involving both students and staff; and (5) a review of current curriculum for antisemitic content.

Albert Jordan, a resident, addressed the board during public comment to raise concerns about outdoor dining enclosures on School Street. He argued that:

• Jersey barriers are an eyesore and create pedestrian safety hazards, particularly for older residents
• People jaywalk across the street between barriers and other establishments at night
• Delivery trucks are forced to block crosswalks because the barriers eliminate curbside access
• The spaces are tied up 24 hours a day but used only briefly
• Street sweepers cannot access the areas between barriers
• Businesses unable to expand outdoors are disadvantaged while competitors benefit from public property

He asked the board to address these concerns on a case-by-case basis and suggested limiting the season and hours of use.

The board welcomed Gina Hart, social worker at Marblehead High School, and Julia Ferrera, assistant superintendent for teaching and learning, who were present to present data from the October 2023 youth survey on substance use and mental health.

A resident speaking at the mic raised two concerns: whether a named individual involved in a prior flag incident was placed on the superintendent search committee, and whether the sole remaining candidate — who she said left his previous position due to conflict with his school committee — would be compatible with the current Marblehead board.

A committee member responding online clarified that it is search consultant Michelle Carlson’s policy not to disclose search committee membership until a search concludes, and that this policy, not school committee purview, explains the lack of disclosure.

The Town Administrator briefed the board on two items included in meeting materials:

1. Quarterly Traffic Safety Advisory Committee report — provided as required by bylaw.
2. Draft HR policies — Five policies were prepared as the town moves toward federal and state compliance now that a Human Resources Director is in place. Policies include: Family and Medical Leave Act, Sexual Harassment (update), Anti-Discrimination/Anti-Harassment, Employee Conduct and Discipline, and the Parental Leave Act. The board discussed whether any policies implicate collective bargaining obligations; the Town Administrator indicated those would be identified before the next meeting. The board expects to review some or all policies at its next regular meeting.

Resident Albert Jordan raised a concern about continuity for veterans services given Dave Rogers’ departure, noting Rogers handles bereavement-related inquiries and that a gap in coverage would be problematic. The Town Administrator confirmed that with town meeting now concluded and funding secured, the town will review job descriptions and post this and other vacant positions within days.

A board member provided an update from the Marblehead Mental Health Task Force:

• The Nan Project (suicide prevention/mental health literacy program) presentation has been postponed to the June 3rd virtual/in-person meeting. Approximately 75 North Shore schools are already engaged with the program.
• On June 22nd, the Marblehead Counseling Center will hold a wellness fair at Hobbs Playground, including a garden dedication in memory of Amy Salts, who donated much of her estate to the center.
• The Marblehead Current published a column by Dr. Thomas Zaro summarizing Jonathan Haidt’s The Anxious Generation, recommending that parents, schools, communities, and government take steps to limit youth smartphone and social media use.

Dr. Zaro spoke briefly, highlighting that the minimum age of 13 for app sign-ups was effectively set by tech companies, and that raising it to 16 with enforceable age verification could be the most impactful public health intervention. He noted rising rates of depression, anxiety, and sexual harassment among young people linked to social media exposure, and pointed to European and British regulatory efforts as models.

The discussion also touched on school phone policies, the value of unstructured free play, and research showing that physical writing improves retention compared to typing.

A resident offered public comment on several topics:

• Tenesco Country Club / assessor issue: Concern that Swampscott found a loophole allowing reduced assessments, potentially shifting tax burden to Marblehead residents.
• Board of Health conduct: Described recent meetings as uncivil and called on the Select Board to encourage better decorum across all town boards.
• Traffic & Safety Advisory Committee: Questioned why meetings are held at 4 PM in Abbott Hall when many working residents cannot attend.
• Road conditions: Called for more public reporting from the highway/DPW department and noted deplorable street conditions.
• School staffing: Expressed concern about experienced staff departing, specifically naming a principal (Amanda Murphy) who is leaving.
• Coffin School building: Objected to the School Committee’s reported reluctance to relinquish the building, noting ongoing heating and electricity costs.

The Chair thanked the resident and noted the budget hearing Friday would include all department heads; she also suggested the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee be given feedback about extending meeting time.

A resident asked whether the reported $250,000 town contribution to the school budget was guaranteed or contingent on passage of a meals and hotel tax. The resident also commented critically on the termination of a staff member identified as Ann Haskell, stating personal familiarity with the employee and her attorney, and indicated intent to attend any resulting court proceedings.

During public comment:

• A resident stated that receiving zero general contractor bids for the transfer station project represents a failure of the board’s oversight and noted the town is paying approximately $400,000 per year on a bond for a facility not yet built.
• A resident named Elliot noted the public health nurses are conducting an April diaper drive accepting disposable and cloth diapers and wipes; participating health departments include Marblehead, Swampscott, Salem, Danvers, and Beverly.
• Elliot also suggested the board manage overflow lines at hazardous waste events by placing a sticker on the last car that will be admitted, to prevent residents from waiting unnecessarily.

The board discussed expanding substance abuse support options for Marblehead residents. Key topics included:

• Learn to Cope: Nearest in-person chapter meets in Peabody on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays; Zoom sessions draw 30–35 participants. Board members and a community member with lived experience expressed interest in bringing a chapter to Marblehead.
• Opioid abatement funds: Andrew noted funds are available for education, scholarships for treatment, and that Swampscott has issued a community survey the board plans to adapt for Marblehead.
• NAN Project: A local organization working in 75 Boston-area schools on suicide prevention; Marblehead has not yet partnered with it. Outreach to assistant superintendent Julia Ferrera and school counselor Gina Hart is underway.
• Red Watch Band program: Peer-to-peer program empowering youth to support one another at social events; has been used with Marblehead schools in prior years around prom season.
• Speaker series: Discussion of a community event featuring individuals with lived experience of addiction, potentially a panel format with mental health professionals present for support. Fall or early school year identified as a more realistic target than summer.
• Mental Health Task Force: Joanne reported the task force (co-chaired by Mark Labon) is exploring several speakers including Kevin Rosario (YouTube, lived experience) and Charlie Stein (strength-based speaking). Next task force meeting is May 15th.
• A $45,000 ARPA allocation to the Counseling Center was acknowledged; center president Ruth Ferguson confirmed Terry McDonough as the principal point of contact for substance use disorder programming.

The chair opened the April 9th meeting by summarizing steps taken after the prior meeting’s emotional public testimony on substance abuse. The board has been in contact with the Marblehead Counseling Center regarding new programs, and a report from the Student at Risk survey is expected from high school adjustment counselor Gina Hart and assistant superintendent Julia Ferrera at the June meeting.

No public comment was offered in person or online. The committee voted to adjourn.

The public budget hearing drew extensive testimony over approximately two hours. Key themes included:

Educators on working conditions:

• Multiple teachers and support staff described being hit, scratched, or threatened by students, inadequate therapeutic staffing, overwhelmed speech-language pathologists (down from 9.6 to 6.6 FTEs this year), and paraprofessionals earning as little as $11.93/hour.
• A 16-year therapeutic program teacher (Justin Beachwood, Glover School) described unsafe student-to-staff ratios and systematic staffing reductions over recent years.
• Three speech-language pathologists reported four open SLP positions for next year due to resignations and retirement.
• Teachers raised concerns about mold identified in classroom B213 at Marblehead High School, including spore types flagged as potentially hazardous, and questioned whether proper remediation was performed.

Residents and benchmarking:

• Jonathan Letterman (former 12-year School Committee member) argued Marblehead spends more per pupil than comparable districts while paying teachers less, and called for benchmarking against higher-performing districts.
• Rick Petski noted that only approximately 25% of Marblehead households have children in public schools, and that households led by someone over 55 now exceed 50% of the population — the voter base needed for any override.
• Steve Volpe (Village School teacher) presented 2023 Grade 10 MCAS data showing Marblehead ranked first among local comparable districts in both ELA and math, while ranking second-to-last in average teacher salary (2021 DESE data).

Override and funding mechanics discussion:

• School Committee members discussed that they can vote any budget they believe appropriate; town meeting ultimately decides funding.
• Member Allison Taylor stated unequivocal support for open bargaining with the MEA.
• Chair Fox clarified that campaign finance law prohibits using public funds to campaign for a ballot initiative.
• Member Brian Oda noted the current delta between level-funded and level-services budgets is approximately $2.5 million.
• Several speakers called for organizing a community-based override campaign outside of official channels.

A board member (identified as Tom) proposed that the Board of Health sponsor community events featuring residents sharing personal substance abuse experiences. The discussion drew emotional public testimony:

• Laney Goodman, a Marblehead resident and project director at Lynn Community Health Center, described her son’s addiction beginning before age 18 and her creation of a parent support group called FOCUS (Families of Children Using Substances). She offered to serve as a contact resource for parents.
• A second resident (Dave, Stonybrook Road) described his daughter’s heroin addiction from 1986–1996 and her 27 years in recovery; his other daughter is the Northeast regional director for Learn to Cope.
• A third resident, a retired Navy officer, described running a Navy drug-prevention education program in the early 1990s and cited a four-star admiral’s assessment that K–12 education is the greatest national security threat.

The board also noted that 25 opioid recovery “sandbox” boxes containing Narcan have been installed in town buildings, with installation in schools forthcoming.

The discussion included a tense exchange between board members over tone and process. A motion was proposed to formally commit the board to moving forward with resident-speaker events; it did not receive a clear second or recorded vote.

MEA representative Jonathan Hillard (26 Rough Road) read a formal statement on behalf of the union raising four specific concerns:

1. Glover colleagues were placed on paid administrative leave without just cause and were not allowed to ask or answer questions about the incident.
2. Staff were not allowed to review video of the incident until after they were placed on leave.
3. Only one camera angle out of multiple was used in the determination.
4. Staff had repeatedly requested a support plan for the student involved, but those requests were ignored by administration.

The MEA also called on the school committee to return to the town and advocate for full FY25 budget funding, noting a projected loss of approximately 15% of total staff over 12 months and a projected 13% increase in elementary enrollment over the next 10 years.

Following Hillard, approximately 20 educators from Glover, Village, and Brown schools—including Kristen Zaro, Hannah Partica, Diane Gora, Lauren Catalano, Linda Bruce, Laura West, Sarah Colleen, Isabelle Nee, Laura Clark, Dana Trudeau, Lindsay Bark, Eliza Denim, Emily Perez, Carrie Bergon, Megan Bruit, and Holly Landry—each stated their names and read identical statements of solidarity with the Glover colleagues.

The final portion of public comment included:

• Megan Sweeney raised the double standard between scrutiny of the school committee versus other town boards managing public funds, and asked how the community can ensure the select board treats school funding as a genuine priority.
• Kathy Hempel asked each committee member to self-grade A–F. Members gave themselves grades of B to B-minus, citing strong budget transparency, good labor relations, and work on superintendent hiring, while acknowledging the superintendent search started later than ideal.
• Tara Sage and Joelle Eeen expressed strong support for the committee, characterizing them as dealing with inherited multi-generational problems.
• Greg Tido (60-year resident, children and grandchildren through Marblehead schools) noted that voters elected the current majority with over 3,000 votes each and suggested critics allow the committee to govern until the next election.
• Nicole Cohen expressed confidence in the committee’s budget process and said she believed the community would support the committee if an override were sought.

The forum drew questions on several interconnected financial topics:

School property disposition: A resident asked why Coffin School has not been sold. Committee members explained that school building deeds are held by the town, not the school department; proceeds from any sale would flow to the town general fund and not directly to the school budget. The committee also cited uncertainty about future enrollment (a projection of approximately 100 additional students over 8–10 years) and the pending MBTA overlay zoning change (potentially allowing up to 900 new units) as reasons to retain the property.

Ground lease concept: A resident with 40 years of HUD experience described ground-lease financing as an alternative to outright sale, citing the Brick Bottom co-op in Boston as a model. Committee members noted that since deeds are in the town’s name, any such arrangement would be the select board’s authority; they referred the resident to Town Administrator Thatcher Keer.

Override and non-parent voters: A resident noted that approximately 75% of Marblehead households have no children in public schools and asked what arguments the committee would make to those voters if an override is sought. Committee members clarified that no override has been formally voted on or decided, though a placeholder has appeared on the warrant as standard practice since at least 2019. Members argued that strong schools protect property values for all homeowners regardless of whether they have children in the district.

One resident spoke during the public comment period on two topics:

1. Snow closure policy: The resident suggested the town reconsider how it decides to close offices during snowstorms, arguing decisions should wait until the morning of the storm and that the cost of closures is significant given budget constraints.

2. Eagle Scout recognition: The resident noted that the board previously invited Eagle Scouts to attend a meeting and present their projects, and suggested resuming that practice as a positive community gesture given the difficulty of achieving that rank.

The committee debated at length whether to hold the public forum as scheduled Thursday or wait for the League’s preferred late-March date with a trained moderator. Key concerns raised included:

• Whether the meeting would constitute public comment (where viewpoint-based restrictions are prohibited under case law) or a structured conversation
• Whether to include all five members or send fewer than a quorum to avoid deliberation issues
• How to handle questions on topics — particularly the superintendent separation — that the committee cannot legally discuss

Committee member Brian argued that saying publicly “we can’t answer that” is itself valuable transparency. Chair Sarah recommended holding Thursday’s meeting as an open conversation with the committee, then scheduling the more formalized league-moderated forum in late March as a follow-up.

The committee reached consensus to:

• Hold the forum Thursday at 7 PM at the high school in hybrid format
• Set a one-minute time limit per question (rather than the league’s suggested 30 seconds or the standard 3-minute public comment limit)
• Have the superintendent step back from that portion so the committee answers directly
• Ask Mimi to provide available dates for the March league-moderated event

Counsel Liz noted that without a vetting moderator, the session is functionally public comment and the committee cannot prevent speakers from raising any topic, only choose not to respond to out-of-scope questions.

The League of Women Voters representative (identified as Mimi) outlined what the league could offer: a structured forum format with written and oral questions, a trained out-of-town moderator, and strict protocols against personal attacks. She noted their preferred moderator — the co-president of the state league — was unavailable before the March 5 elections. The league recommended postponing the forum to around March 28 to allow adequate public preparation time, citing the upcoming Farewell Party for a school official and the fact that many residents had been away during vacation week.

The chair opened public comment. No members of the public were present at the microphone and no hands were raised on Zoom.

Mary McCarrison addressed the committee in person, noting that the Director of Finance position had been posted but no superintendent search posting was visible. She urged the committee to include METCO and CPAC representatives on any search committee, to engage more broadly with community critics, and to prioritize the budget given the upcoming end of the current superintendent’s tenure.

Following the State of the Town, the Board took extensive public comment. Themes recorded in the minutes:

Tax and assessment process

• Questions on property taxes and explanations of assessments
• Suggestion that the town website include a link that fully explains the tax assessment process
• “No standards or guidance put forth by Assessors. Why isn’t the Town Administrator/Select Board holding Assessors accountable?”
• Concern that a Board of Assessors representative was not invited to the meeting to answer questions
• Question on tax growth and accountability to the people of the town

Technology

• ClearGov and migration to Office 365 are a big plus; suggestion to add Microsoft Teams suite

Mission and growth

• Comment on the town’s mission statement and how level of services is measured
• Question on how to attract and maintain new growth through commercial development

Department-head accessibility

• “Town department heads should not work remotely and should live in Marblehead”
• “Cannot find anyone at Mary Alley to answer his questions because they are not there”
• The public should be able to make appointments

Decentralization

• “We have a decentralized form of government locally, which has amazing positives, and occasionally some negatives. It is the role of the Board of Assessors to be answering these questions and handling these issues.”
• Comment also on base levy, new growth, revenue projections, and free cash

The override

• “Impressed with the presentation and its transparency. Disappointed with the failed override but appreciated the Board’s desire to be creative in finding other revenue sources for the town.”

Schools

• “Are expense projections based on current services?”
• “If the town is not asking for an override, what about the schools?”
• “The children of Marblehead deserve exemplary education and the current budget does not allow that. Positions were left unfilled at the schools because they could not attract candidates. Town will lose families coming into town if not in good financial health. Town and Schools should work together.”

“What we invest in as a town shows what we all value.”

The Chair thanked everyone for the comments and discussion. No votes taken on public-comment items.

Adjournment

Motion made and seconded to adjourn at 8:20 PM. All in favor.

Mary McCarrison (46 Pinecliff Drive) commended high school students for organizing listening sessions on inclusion, warned that the town lacks support for an override given rising taxes, suggested returning the Coffin School property to generate revenue for special education and teacher salaries, and urged the committee to listen to students on flag policies. She stated she does not believe an override will pass.

Nyla Dubois (37 Green Street) said she is a Black woman raising three daughters and expressed concern about what she described as critical social justice framing in schools. She argued that Black Lives Matter does not represent all Black people, that the connection between displaying certain flags and student success lacks evidentiary support, and that viewpoint diversity and free dialogue are more important than symbolic gestures. She said she found the draft flag policy to be relatively fair, and announced plans for a community publication called “Marblehead Free Thought.”

Resident Albert Jordan spoke during public comment on two topics:

Police vehicle color: Jordan argued that all-black police cruisers are less visible than black-and-white schemes used by Salem, Danvers, and Swampscott. He suggested the Select Board invite the police chief to discuss the issue before signing future lease agreements, citing officer safety and traffic deterrence as rationale.

Parking enforcement: Jordan stated he had observed vehicles with out-of-state plates parked on Turner Road for approximately six months without being ticketed or towed, despite out-of-state plates being required to convert to Massachusetts plates within 30 days. He also noted that no snow emergency was declared during the recent snowstorm, which the Town Administrator confirmed was a deliberate decision based on forecast conditions (no hard freeze following the storm).

Two residents commented during the public comment period:

1. A resident with apparent construction/procurement expertise questioned whether the bid falls under M.G.L. Chapter 30 §39 or §149, raised the filed sub-bid requirement for electrical and roofing alternates, and sought clarification on where the non-revolving-fund portion of project money is held. The director clarified that $600,000 comes from the waste revolving account and the remainder from settlement recovery funds in the original project article account.

2. A second resident (identified as Ms. Devin) noted that approximately 50 years ago Marblehead was among the first communities to practice source-separated recycling, requiring separate containers for different glass colors, cans, and paper — drawing a parallel to current discussions about improving recycling sorting.

Tom Zaro (via Zoom) added that the Wellesley transfer station effectively serves a population comparable in size to Marblehead’s active users, and called the sorting and baling operation impressive.

Mary McKay of 46 Pinecliff Drive addressed the committee, stating her phone had been active with community members asking her to relay a message asking an unnamed individual to resign, citing seven months of what she described as chaos for the community, students, and teachers.

A large group of educators, tutors, and parents addressed the committee. Key themes across statements included:

• Unsafe working conditions: Teachers described being directed to ignore dysregulated students, left without paraprofessional support, and told to “just teach” while students exhibited violent or disruptive behavior.
• MEA no-confidence vote: Speakers repeatedly referenced the Marblehead Education Association’s vote of no confidence (approximately 97% in favor) in Student Services Director Paula Donnelly and Assistant Director Emily Dean, and demanded their immediate removal.
• Specific allegations: Speakers alleged Donnelly and Dean overrode professional staff judgment during restraint incidents, directed team members not to recommend services in IEP meetings, cut BCBA consulting supports, failed to fill paraprofessional vacancies (leaving IEP-mandated positions empty for two months), and retaliated against staff who raised concerns.
• Staffing deterioration: Multiple speakers noted the district had gone from multiple board-certified behavior analysts (BCBAs) to one BCBA servicing the entire district.
• Fear of retaliation: A high school math teacher reading on behalf of colleagues stated that educators at Marblehead High School were afraid to attend for fear of retaliation.
• Parent voices: A Glover School PTO vice president and several parents expressed concern about ongoing safety and urged the committee to act on teacher recommendations.

The chair paused public comment at the 15-minute policy mark, proceeded briefly through the agenda, then reopened comment before the meeting continued. A brief recess was called at approximately 7:41 PM after a public comment became disruptive.

Two residents spoke during public comment.

Jim (phonetic, 2 Mom Road): Expressed support for the charter discussion. Noted the League of Women Voters has done approximately a year of research. Cautioned against changing the form of government without broad public support, citing a failed attempt in another community to convert to a mayor-council form. Mentioned the Board of Health may bring a town meeting article to increase its board size to five as an example of the type of governance question a charter committee might address.

Albert Jordan, 64 Roosevelt Avenue: Raised several public safety concerns:

1. A double telephone pole at Smith Street and Baldwin Road near the Brown School crosswalk has existed for approximately three to four years; it shaves passing trucks, blocks a traffic light, and creates a sight-line hazard for pedestrians at the school crosswalk, particularly given a recent area pedestrian fatality.
2. Verizon plans to replace approximately 400 utility poles in Marblehead in a year; Jordan questioned oversight of that project given past experience with double poles left standing for months on Village Street.
3. A gas company contractor on Turner Road has left equipment (backhoe, compressor, piles of sand) on a road corner for months, creating a hazard, and a neighbor parks a large truck alongside it at night.

Ruth Ferguson (board president, via Zoom) and Ron (vice president) presented the Counseling Center’s annual update. The center currently serves approximately 500 clients providing over 6,000 hours of therapy, but carries a wait list of 321 individuals, 124 of whom (39%) are Marblehead residents. The wait list includes requests dating back to 2022.

Board members noted the town’s annual appropriation was reduced from $120,000 to $60,000 approximately a decade ago and has not been restored. Board members discussed whether opioid settlement funds received by the town might be applied to supplement the appropriation, and whether a targeted Prop 2½ override article for mental health funding could be placed on a town meeting warrant (the Center’s leadership indicated it would be inappropriate for them to advocate for such an article but acknowledged the Board of Health could do so).

The center reported a $120,000 three-year grant from the Cummings Foundation, a $25,000 state budget appropriation secured through Rep. Armini, and strong fundraising through its golf event and the Gary Five event. A first-floor renovation of the town-owned Hobbs Building is planned to go out to bid January 2, estimated at $40,000–$50,000 using ARPA funds, to consolidate administrative space and create a dedicated group therapy room once a surplus stove is removed.

Melanie Andrews (13 Tucker Street) described her experience with an eighth-grade assignment using the American Library Association’s challenged-book list. She read explicit passages from the selected book and argued the assignment lacked adequate parental notice, appropriate vetting, and accommodation for students on IEPs. She requested the committee respond with improved procedures.

Mary McCarton (46 Pine Cliff Drive) expressed frustration with what she characterized as a lack of transparency, referencing a workshop meeting she attended and a request by a committee member for future workshops to be held in closed session. She stated that senior citizens in her network were reluctant to support an override given recent events.

Kristen Dube Horton (23 Orange Street), on behalf of the Marblehead Racial Justice Task Force, read a letter requesting the committee create a policy affirming symbols of acceptance including the Black Lives Matter flag and Pride flag. The letter cited research linking such symbols to student success and warned that bans have historically increased controversy and invited litigation.

Virginia O’Brien (2 Garden Road) commented via Zoom, supporting the idea of private workshop sessions for the committee, framing it as a matter of psychological safety rather than a lack of transparency.

Jordan Roosevelt raised two issues:

1. A dumpster permitted by the Police Chief in front of a restaurant on Pleasant Street has been in place for months and, along with a second dumpster on Washington Street, poses a safety hazard. The Town Administrator noted the Pleasant Street dumpster permit expires Friday and outdoor dining permits expire November 30.
2. Outdoor dining installations at Five Corners were described as blocking sidewalks for pedestrians and obstructing delivery truck access. Roosevelt suggested the program, which originated during COVID, be reconsidered.

Roosevelt also asked the board to send condolences to the family of recently deceased Peter Preble, a longtime police officer and crossing guard.

A second resident detailed a lengthy dispute over public records (FOIA) fees, alleging that the town’s website states fees will be estimated and excess amounts refunded, but in practice no refund was made after he paid $750 for a request that he later determined took the town approximately nine hours of work ($175). He said he pursued the matter in Small Claims Court (dismissed for lack of jurisdiction), that the town incurred approximately $3,000 in legal fees defending against his $575 refund claim, and that the Secretary of State’s office was told the town does not track hours on records requests. He called for the town to honor its stated refund policy, fix the public records process, and seek new outside legal counsel.

Four residents addressed the board:

Steve Elliot, Turner Road: Praised Dr. Mauro’s presentation and expressed appreciation for a new transfer station employee. Asked about budget capacity to connect the new compactor and whether commercial dumping data could be placed on the agenda. Noted that out-of-town users benefit from Marblehead’s facilities without contributing tax dollars.

Alan Waller, 159 [street not stated]: Stated that town credibility is at a low point ahead of an anticipated operational override vote. Argued that without a transparent accounting of past transfer station expenditures, an override will not pass. Called on the board to request a public letter from the town administrator explaining what went wrong with prior spending.

Tom Day, Stony Brook Road: Asked for a clearer timeline on DEP approval and the bidding process for the transfer station construction, noting repeated deferrals at prior meetings.

Heather [last name not stated], Boat Road: Described witnessing multiple incidents near the rail trail involving youth in distress, expressed concern about lack of police follow-through on assault complaints, and raised issues with road conditions affecting elderly and mobility-impaired residents. Also mentioned an unresolved sinkhole near the baseball field.

MEA Co-presidents Jonathan Hillard (26 Ralph Road) and Sally Shery (80 Garfield Street) delivered a prepared statement on behalf of district educators. They reported that from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 there were 28 FOIA requests, and from July 1, 2023 onward the district had received 45 requests or amended requests—approximately a 65% increase in four months over the entire prior school year. Legal fees related to FOIA requests since July 1, 2023 were estimated at $5,640, with staff time costs estimated at an additional $4,000. The union noted that a press outlet had subsequently filed a sweeping request for all complaints against anyone in the school community since July 1, 2023, and that Marblehead Public Schools had calculated approximately 460,000 incoming emails in that period. The MEA called on the committee and administration to enforce existing handbook policies and to stop what they characterized as misuse of anti-harassment complaint mechanisms.

A second educator speaker, identifying herself as having worked in Marblehead since 1997, echoed concerns about community trust and the climate around schools, welcoming back incoming Superintendent Dr. Theresa McGinnis.

Chair Fox displayed the FOIA request document publicly and explained that the committee’s flag-policy process was triggered by a Supreme Court case (Shurtleff v. City of Boston) establishing that without a governing policy, a public entity must permit all flags. She clarified the intent was legal compliance, not removal of existing flags.

Resident Mary McCarrison (46 Pinecliff Drive) reported calling 21 communities about flag policies and urged the committee to allow diversity flags to remain, citing the town’s demographic makeup. Four Marblehead High School students identifying as members of Team Harmony—Nina Johnson, Marin Potter, Paige Fletcher, and Callie Curtis—read a joint statement urging that the Pride, Juneteenth, and BLM flags currently in the cafeteria remain and that students be formally included in any policy process. Two additional speakers, Nikia Bell (2 Green Hayes Street) and a parent from Dorchester identifying her son as attending a Marblehead school, spoke about incidents of disrespect toward students of color and their concerns about the flag situation and school safety.

Chair Sarah Fox opened the meeting with a personal statement supporting Superintendent Cresta’s communication to the community following the Hamas attack on Israel, noting the committee had not met since the conflict began and therefore could not act as a collective body. She also addressed what she characterized as the weaponization of the bullying complaint process.

Public comment drew several residents, including Israeli and Jewish community members who expressed fear, grief, and gratitude for Cresta’s statement. Speakers described personal connections to victims in Israel, concerns about antisemitism experienced locally, and relief that the school district issued a public statement of support. One speaker noted a petition in support of Cresta’s message had gathered approximately 1,296 signatures.

After a brief recess, the committee took up the formal complaint filed by a community member on October 12. Cresta waived her right to executive session and read a statement affirming her original communication. The committee then voted 5-0 to find no wrongdoing.

Dan Albert addressed the board, noting the Coffin School has sat vacant since the Brown School opened and has required fire department responses 20–30 times. He raised concerns about asbestos remediation costs if demolished, the loss of fire sprinkler protection after water and gas shutoffs, and ongoing maintenance expenses. He stated he would not support an override while the Coffin School situation remains unresolved, and suggested the community could bring a citizens’ petition to Town Meeting if the Select Board does not act.

The meeting opened with two statements responding to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. The chair noted an evening event at Shaaret Haiyam and a combined ADL/Marblehead Ministerial Association community gathering planned for Sunday, October 15 at 4:30 PM. A board member read a personal statement drawing on his experience as a Marine officer off Lebanon in 1985, expressing solidarity with both Jewish and Muslim residents of Marblehead.

Larry McCarrison (46 Drive) addressed the committee during public comment. He noted that an ADA complaint had been filed by Mary McCarrison due to the inability of audience members to hear board members during meetings. He stated he had raised the issue repeatedly and had also contacted the state regarding a potential open meeting law violation.

The chair had previously noted that the complaint was received that day and that the feedback from an amplifier conflicts with the Poly system used for hybrid Zoom meetings, potentially requiring the board to choose between in-person-only or Zoom-only formats while a technical solution is sought.

Public comment included the following speakers:

• Steve Elliott: Longtime transfer station user questioned whether out-of-town commercial vehicles are using the facility without restriction, suggested Marblehead residents and contractors should receive preference, and asked how the 20% C&D threshold is tracked in practice.
• Laney (Helene) Goodman: Expressed support for fentanyl strips and Narcan but advocated for placement at more visible locations (fire station, police station, high school). Expressed concern about visible disagreement among board members.
• Alan Waller: Suggested the board seek restitution from the owner’s representative (Tellerman Costa) for the transfer station project overrun, and recommended proactive community engagement before asking for more funds at Town Meeting.
• Resident (name unclear): Compared the Wellesley and Marblehead transfer stations, noted the Marblehead employee trailer is overdue for replacement, and clarified that board members may attend events together under open meeting law as long as board business is not discussed.
• Bob Roberta (construction professional, attending in person): Raised concerns about construction project priorities and scheduling, suggested the board push the architect harder for a schedule, noted the importance of scrutinizing requisitions, and referenced a past library project where the architect and general contractor were found to be colluding and the town paid costs that were the GC’s contractual responsibility.
• Jim (remote, Sentry Mound Road): Supported the five-member board expansion but suggested having the Select Board sponsor the Town Meeting article to avoid the appearance of self-interest.
• Megan Sweeney (Beacon Street, Power Up): Announced a domestic violence stakeholder gathering on October 23rd, 6–8 PM at Star of the Sea Community Center, co-hosted with HAWC, YWCA North Shore Rape Crisis Center, Body Science, Detective Tom McMahon, and School Committee Chair Sarah Fox.
• Terrace (32 Rowland Street, remote): Requested more frequent board meetings to shorten individual sessions, earlier start times (6:30–7 PM suggested), and more accessible placement of Narcan and fentanyl test strips.

The state representative covered three areas at the board’s invitation:

Solid Waste / Bottle Bill The legislature’s Environment and Natural Resources Committee has heard testimony on producer responsibility and recycling. Multiple bottle bill versions are pending; the representative co-sponsors a bill by Public Health Chair Marjorie Decker (Bill 2609) that would cover any drinkable liquid intended for human consumption (excluding baby formula), raise the deposit from 5 cents to 10 cents with inflation adjustments, and expand container size limits. The representative stated that nip bottles would likely be included in any final bill. Producer responsibility legislation showing consensus around mattresses and cardboard; paint was also discussed. Governor Healy signed an executive order banning single-use plastic bottle purchases by executive agencies — first in the nation; the board raised a question about emergency-response exemptions, which the representative agreed to research.

Mental Health The representative highlighted the FY24 state budget investments: $120 million for children’s mental health services, $25 million for emergency department diversion for youth, $6 million for social-emotional learning grants, $3 million for student telehealth access, and $598 million for the Department of Mental Health Adult Services. A $25,000 earmark was secured for the Marblehead Counseling Center. The legislature overrode the governor’s veto of a $1.4 million teen texting crisis program (K-SAM/Samaritans). The representative is also pursuing placing a suicide hotline number on student ID cards.

Substance Use Disorder Overdose deaths were at a record high in 2022. The governor and lieutenant governor announced a partnership with Boston Medical Center to expand the Massachusetts Overdose Prevention helpline using a ‘spotting model.’ The representative noted that a Narcan training was held for House and Senate members and now carries Narcan personally.

Resident Albert Jordan of Roosevelt Avenue spoke during public comment to request that the board send a letter of condolences to the family of a former selectman identified as Alexander, who served in the 1970s and later resided in Swampscott. The board unanimously approved the motion to send a letter of condolences.

A resident asked whether CPAC and METCO members had been specifically considered for the interim superintendent search committee, and sought clarification on a reported statement that the chair was ‘reserved’ about MCAS results. The chair clarified she had not said she was reserved but was waiting for a formal presentation from Assistant Superintendent Julia Ferrara. A committee member also noted for the record that the 2019 Interim Superintendent Search Committee did not include a CPAC or METCO representative.

No members of the public signed up for public comment. Student representative KA Piper provided an update covering freshman elections scheduled for October 4th, the Spanish class PUL project, homecoming on October 14th, college visits, picture day on October 3rd, an upcoming Club Fair, and a League of Women Voters voter registration table that saw significant student activity. Athletics updates included an upcoming football game with a camouflage-themed student section.

Resident (Leelan, Westport Lane / Marblehead Current) asked:

• Whether Narcan and fentanyl test strips are free (confirmed: yes)
• Whether overdose statistics are available (Andrew said he can obtain them from the police chief)
• Whether COVID cases are increasing — Andrew noted wastewater data suggests levels comparable to 2020 in the region; rapid tests available free through September 30; new booster guidance deferred to primary care physicians and forthcoming CDC/state guidance.

Resident (Barbara/Bob) raised concerns about construction cost overruns on town projects, referencing the landfill closure project and questioning contingency planning. Andrew explained that underground construction involves significant unknowns and that the 17-acre landfill contained more waste material than estimated. He noted that going forward, the transfer station project has an owner’s project manager (Jerry Smith) and architect oversight. The resident offered informal assistance with construction monitoring.

Two residents spoke during public comment:

Amy Danforth (Manchin Road) — A 30-year resident and frequent rail trail user, she expressed support for redirecting ARPA funds to trail improvements. She noted the Seaview-to-West Shore segment serves four public schools, two temples, the community center, post office, and library. She raised concern that the trail master plan has seen limited implementation since 2019 and asked what commitment exists once current funds are exhausted. She also expressed interest in forming a Friends of the Rail Trail group.

Dan Albert (58 Leicester Road, via Zoom) — Commented on the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee, cautioning that it should not mirror a prior traffic committee. He stated the committee’s purpose is to implement the town’s Complete Streets policy per Article 49 from town meeting, and indicated he would return to town meeting to add more prescriptive language if the committee’s work diverges from that intent.

Chris Pool asked two questions during public comment:

1. Cost of permanent search: The chair explained that when the district conducted its last permanent search, a request for proposals was issued and bids varied widely; some were in the single-digit thousands. No cost estimate is available until an RFP goes out. If an interim becomes the permanent superintendent, there may be no search cost at all.

2. Meeting scheduling: Pool noted that 9:30 a.m. and noon Friday meetings are not conducive to public attendance. The chair explained that during the regular school year the committee holds standing meetings on the first and third Thursday of each month; the unusual summer/early-fall schedule was driven by the urgency of the superintendent situation and by the availability of outside professionals (attorneys, NESDEC, etc.) The availability of Zoom recordings was noted as a way for the public to stay informed.

Dan Albert, 58 Lister Road noted that bicycle shoulder accommodations were expected to be installed in front of Glover School before the school year, a requirement from a 2012 planning board approval. He also credited an Open Meeting Law complaint he filed for prompting the town website adoption vote, raised concerns about the governance of the Complete Streets Committee, and urged the board to develop a comprehensive transportation and mobility plan. He noted the rail trail ($1.43 million ARPA investment) currently lacks a formal maintenance plan and is being mowed with a borrowed mower.

Albert Jordan, Roosevelt Avenue reported a safety hazard from a dumpster placed in front of the Rip Tide restaurant near a busy intersection, blocking sightlines to the crosswalk. He suggested the town consider a daily fee for on-street dumpsters and pods to encourage timely removal. He also expressed frustration about recent events at the school department, praised the Select Board for working collaboratively on the volunteer appointment policy, and urged civility among town boards.

The committee voted unanimously to waive the 15-minute public comment limit given the volume of community interest. Speakers addressed the departure of Superintendent Dr. John Bucky, with many questioning the transparency of the process, the financial cost to the district, and compliance with open meeting law.

Key themes from public comment included:

• Multiple speakers, including former committee member Sarah Gold and municipal attorney Nina Pickering-Cook, argued that any final vote on the superintendent’s contract should have been taken in open session prior to signing.
• Pickering-Cook (town counsel for Acton, Dover, and Bedford) stated that the ratification vote held at this meeting did not resolve the open meeting law complaints if the agreement had already been signed and legally binding.
• Some speakers called for committee members to resign; others, including John Dano and Frank Kaner, defended the committee’s use of executive session and criticized what they characterized as hostile rhetoric.
• Jonathan Heller, speaking as a parent and teacher (and noting he was not representing the Marblehead Education Association), expressed concern about leadership instability and its cumulative impact on teachers who have experienced frequent curriculum and program changes.
• Speakers also raised concerns about antisemitism and other forms of discrimination occurring within school buildings, calling on the committee to speak out when such incidents occur.
• One speaker raised the quality and nutritional value of school lunches under the new universal free lunch program.
• A speaker raised concerns about the recess structure and the wellness committee’s role in that discussion.

Resident 1 asked about textile recycling for items too worn to donate. The director explained that CMRK operates a bin at the transfer station and pays at least 5 cents per pound; a QR code on the bin allows scheduling home pickups at no cost.

Steve Elliott (Turner Road) commended transfer station employees and agreed residents treat them poorly. He noted the transfer station is an exceptional resource compared to neighboring communities. He raised concerns about out-of-town contractors using the facility, the 20% C&D trailer limit, and the town website not reflecting the timely reopening of Grace Oliver’s Beach (the state site also lagged). He expressed support for the swap shed rebuild.

Tom Day (Stony Brook Road) asked about next steps after planning board approval. The director said MassDEP permits are submitted with no anticipated rejection; after planning board approval, architects will finalize bid documents with a target of September–October bidding and pre-winter construction start.

Online commenter (Sean) asked how to obtain a copy of an email referenced during the board dispute at the start of the meeting. He was directed to file a Freedom of Information request with the Town Administrator at Abbott Hall; turnaround is 10 days.

Two residents addressed the Policy Subcommittee during public comment on the topic of recess:

• Carla Strobel, parent of three Marblehead students, advocated for reinstating two recesses for K–3 students and asked the committee to clarify why the schedule had originally been changed.
• Naomi, a BU College of Education professor and parent of an incoming first grader, described her son’s difficulties coping with limited physical movement during the school day, noting that his morning snack/recess period often yielded only 5–10 minutes of actual outdoor time due to logistics. She expressed concern that the situation could worsen in first grade.

Elaine Arruda of Washington Street addressed the board to express opposition to the Pride flag painted on the sidewalk at the information booth on Pleasant Street. She stated she was not alone in her objection and posed two questions to the board: (1) how a resident could request removal of the painting, and (2) what process would be needed to establish an ordinance limiting flags displayed on municipal property to the American flag, the state flag, and the town flag. The board chair acknowledged receipt of her prior letter and noted the board would respond by email.

Dan Albert (58 Lester Road) asked for permission in principle to restore the Frederick W. Bailey memorial sign at Bailey Square (intersection of Maple, Esco, Humphrey, Pleasant, and Glendale). He recounted the 1937 history of the sign honoring a Marblehead police officer popular with schoolchildren, a 1993 petition to restore it, and current pedestrian safety concerns at the intersection including blocked sidewalks, long light cycles, and routine red-light running.

Albert Jordan (Roosevelt Avenue) urged the board to complete its new policy before voting on any reappointments, expressing frustration with what he described as years of inaction on process reforms and lack of transparency on committee vacancies.

William Anderson (Elm Street) raised questions about the board’s prior approval of a Pride-themed art installation at the town information kiosk. The chair explained the project was funded by a state cultural council grant and directed him to the recorded meeting for full context.

Jack (last name not captured) encouraged caution in the reappointment review, noting that Marblehead has historically struggled to fill committee vacancies and that long-tenured volunteers provide institutional continuity. He also clarified that Article 54 at town meeting was an advisory vote, not a binding bylaw.

Terry Toro of 113 Jersey Street thanked the board for voting to pursue replacing the employee trailer at the transfer station, noting it is seven years old and that another winter in it could present safety concerns for employees.

Chair Fox opened the meeting at 5:04 PM, with two notes before public comment:

Pre-comment chair statement

Fox spoke about public comment from the previous meeting — a parent had reached out with concerns about the importance of keeping the names of families and students who file complaints confidential, so there would be no fear of retaliation.

Public comment

MEA Co-Presidents Jonathan Heller and Sally Shevory attended in person to read a prepared statement on:

• Their disappointment with the failed override vote
• Support for working to pass a budget that “enhances the quality of public education in Marblehead” and supports the future of the community

Dan Albert, identified as the MBTA Advisory Board designee, addressed the board citing June 9 Complete Streets Committee meeting minutes obtained through an open meeting law complaint. He argued the town currently has overlapping committees — Complete Streets Committee, Traffic Committee, Rail Trail Committee, Safe Routes to Schools, and a prospective Vision Zero Committee — that should be consolidated into the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee created by town meeting Article 49 on May 1.

Albert noted the Metropolitan Area Planning Council is standing up a Vision Zero project worth $2.7 million, and that accessing those funds would require a functioning Vision Zero committee. He stated the Town Administrator has expressed intent to maintain both the old Complete Streets Committee and the new Traffic Safety Advisory Committee simultaneously, which Albert views as problematic. He said he has a meeting scheduled with the police chief to discuss the matter.

John Dobb from the Harbors and Waters Board asked for clarification on whether holdover board members can be sworn in by the town clerk for a July 10 meeting; the town administrator confirmed holdover members continue serving without a new swearing-in.

Jim Sissino noted that holdover appointments are common in other communities and are not unusual.

Dan Albert, 58 Lester Road, the town’s designee to the MBTA Advisory Board, reported three developments:

1. Better Bus Project: The route through Vinnin Square will be eliminated and the last quarter-mile of Route 442 will be truncated to Mulford Street. The change will provide 30-minute headways through most of the day and 45-minute headways from approximately 10 PM to 1 AM. Implementation is delayed due to bus driver shortages.

2. Bus-Dedicated Lane: Representative Armini is interested in a dedicated bus lane on the Lynn-way to significantly reduce travel times.

3. Commuter Rail Electrification: The Newburyport/Rockport Line is the first line scheduled for electrification. Senator Creighton and Representative Armini have sponsored bills requiring electrification by December 31, 2024. Albert suggested the board consider submitting letters of support when hearings occur.

The chair opened the public comment period. No members of the public appeared either in the room or via Zoom.

Richard Smith asked about the process for implementing the Net Zero Roadmap’s proposed energy efficiency licensing for apartments, including whether it would be voluntary or mandatory and what fees might apply. Town Administrator Thatcher explained that the incoming sustainability coordinator would help vet and advance individual recommendations.

Sarah Fox (46 Speed Street) asked where the ARPA ranking spreadsheet is publicly posted and urged the board to prioritize learning-loss funding using updated Treasury guidance.

Jen Schaffner (20 Casino Road) questioned the percentage of ARPA funds allocated to the school department, asked whether ARPA funds were included in certified free cash (Finance Director Alicia confirmed they are held in a separate federal fund, not the general fund), and inquired about a pending $50,000 housing planning allocation on the list.

The chair opened public comment with a four-minute time limit per speaker. No members of the public came forward. The board voted unanimously to adjourn. Next meeting is June 9, 2023.

The board opened the public comment period. No one in the room or on Zoom submitted a comment, and the period was closed without any speakers.

The chair opened the floor for public comment. No individuals were present in the room or online. The board offered no additional announcements and voted unanimously to adjourn.

Two members of the public commented during the open public comment period:

1. An in-person resident stated that after contacting MassDEP, he learned of significant financial and regulatory implications of the board’s chosen transfer station design that he believes were not fully considered when the vote was taken. He urged the board to disclose these financial impacts — including a potential ongoing cost that could offset transfer station revenue — at town meeting rather than have a resident raise them from the floor.

2. A remote participant (identified as Barbara’s husband) recalled that approximately one year prior the board had determined it could proceed with transfer station upgrades using existing funds, with a projected completion of one year. He expressed concern that little visible progress had been made and asked what the prospects were for the project moving forward.

Two residents spoke during public comment.

Sarah Gold (Reed Street; School Committee member): Expressed concern that school department cuts, when broken down by sub-department, are far deeper than town-side reductions. Examples cited:

• Special education positions: 4.5% reduction
• Educational para/tutor positions: ~7% reduction
• High school English teachers: 8.3% reduction
• High school science teachers: 15.3% reduction (21.4% if paras included)
• District library media specialists: 20% reduction
• Fifth-grade teachers: 20% reduction
• Lunch paras: ~38.5% reduction

She also noted the mental health counseling center cut, connecting it to the elimination of lunch para positions that allow school counselors to run lunch groups.

James (last name unclear): Questioned whether the group insurance (GIC) budget is overly conservative. He noted FY22 actuals were approximately $11.4M against a budget of approximately $14.6M, with recent annual increases of approximately 5.4–5.7%. He estimated FY24 actuals could come in below $13M while the budget shows approximately $14.6M, and suggested the cushion may be too large given the depth of service cuts elsewhere. The Finance Committee chair acknowledged some cushion exists but said the current year is not the time to eliminate it given the upcoming PEC negotiation.

Three speakers addressed the committee during public comment:

1. Retired occupational therapist (unnamed): Expressed strong support for school funding and special education services based on 35 years of professional experience. Raised concern that bundling school and town override requests into a single ballot question could complicate voter decision-making, suggesting that voters who support school funding might be deterred by other town items in the same question.

2. Sarah Gold, 9 Reed Street (School Committee member): Expressed difficulty with the framing that school cuts are more impactful than cuts in other departments, while acknowledging she supports the limited ask this year. Emphasized that pitting one town department against another is counterproductive.

3. Jen Schaffner (online): Asked procedural questions about where to submit questions on cemetery and assessor budgets and on the history of Chapter 70 allocation. She noted that economies of scale make cuts at small departments (Cemetery, Assessor) disproportionately harmful relative to savings, and said she understood the approach taken.

The board opened public comment. One resident (identified as Brad) raised a matter relating to consultant or resource use connected to the harbor plan; the chair responded that the broad letter of intent likely covers the matter and deferred to the Town Administrator’s judgment. No other public comments were recorded.

One resident at the meeting raised a concern that staff reports were delivered too quickly to absorb all information and asked how clarifications could be obtained given the board’s no-back-and-forth public comment policy. The chair indicated the resident could speak with staff after the meeting. No other public comment was recorded.

A Mental Health Task Force member presented several upcoming initiatives:

• Healthy Kids Day (tentatively April 26) at the YMCA, bringing together the Counseling Center, Elliott Emergency Services, children’s services providers, and private practitioners for assessments and mindfulness activities.
• A monthly mental health column in the Marblehead Current, with Susan Stelk, Mark Levin, and Melissa Kuperwicz meeting with the editor.
• A $2,650 budget request for: website management by Pete Schelk (~$15/month for minor updates), a 10×10 branded canopy tent for community events, Marblehead Cares magnets (produced with the Female Humane Society), and rack-card brochures (249 for 1,000 cards; 279 for 2,500).

The presenter also highlighted the Massachusetts Behavioral Health Helpline (833-773-2445), available 24/7, with online chat at masshealthline.com. The board indicated a vote on the budget request could occur at the next meeting.

Several community members and union representatives addressed the committee:

• MEA Co-Presidents Jonathan Heller and Sally Chevriot submitted a joint statement with the superintendent in support of the level-services budget, noting collaboration and calling for a dedicated school override in FY25 to address longer-term needs including pay parity and class-size reduction.
• Grace Wilberson (student) spoke against eliminating the Veterans Middle School librarian position.
• Dan Albert, 58 Lesser Road, questioned whether consolidating with a neighboring district could address the structural budget problem and asked about central office reductions before classroom cuts.
• Becky (via Zoom) asked about ARPA allocation percentages; administration responded that the district represents ~50% of the town budget but has received only 7.8% of ARPA funds (~$900,000 of $6M), or ~14% if current requests are approved.
• Katherine Martin, 29 West Shore Drive, urged more aggressive ARPA requests and criticized the town’s 2016–2017 warnings going unheeded; also asked about ~$1.4M remaining in the Brown School building project.
• Kim Day, 18 Liberty Road, asked about next steps and sought clarification on the high school special education line-item reduction (explained as a coding-accuracy improvement, not a program cut) and why the reduced-services figure was set at 1.82% (the $800,000 figure was the town’s allocation to the schools).
• Samantha Rosado, 3 Martin Terrace, a Glover School staff member and parent, expressed concern about paraprofessional wages and morale; administration confirmed minimum-wage funding is included in both budget scenarios.
• Tom Mathers (school committee member) and another speaker emphasized the importance of town–school partnership and avoiding adversarial framing.

Administration confirmed there are no cuts to the current school year; any reduction notices for FY25 would not be issued until after the June 20 election.

During public comment, a resident identified as Aaron asked whether departments were actively using the ClearGov budget software and whether any transition delays would slow the Finance Committee’s review process. Town Administrator Thatcher and Finance Director Alicia confirmed that departments have logins and are completing training modules, but that the current budget cycle will continue to use Excel spreadsheets. The digital budget book will be available for FY24. The committee’s hearing process will not be impacted by the ClearGov transition.

Public comment followed the board’s deliberations. Key remarks included:

• Tom Mathers (School Committee): Supported a stabilization fund, appreciated the explicit assurance that schools are included in level-service funding, and suggested the two override articles be kept separate on the ballot with the structural-deficit article listed first.
• Unidentified resident: Asked whether the structural override would be a permanent general override or a time-limited exclusion, and whether the town’s existing Triple-A bond rating would actually be jeopardized without a stabilization fund.
• Catherine Martin (29 West Shore Drive): Expressed concern about the timeline — five weeks from Town Meeting with no specific numbers yet — and about oversight of a potential stabilization fund given prior fiscal warning signs dating to 2016–2017.
• Megan: Encouraged the board to expedite public forums, noting that residents had been tracking financial reports for years and were not as uninformed as implied.
• Ron: Commended the board for applying lessons learned and praised the new Finance Director’s expertise.
• Nancy Hempel: Asked for clarity on how much free cash would be available if voters reject both the structural-deficit override and the stabilization fund.
• Paul Baker (79 Overlook Road): Echoed concern about board member participation during the discussion.

Frank (24 Pickwick Road): Asked the board to envision what they would wish they had done the day after losing an override vote. He argued that given the current political climate, one open forum would be inadequate and urged broad involvement of department heads, employees, parents, and students.

Sarah Fox (School Committee Chair): Reiterated the importance of the fincom’s independence; called on the board to use the DOR-recommended free-cash percentage as the only plug in the budget, making the override ask equal to a true structural balance. She emphasized that partial plugs push the problem to future taxpayers. She also asked for an update on whether the $800,000 allocated for school contractual obligations remains accurate in light of new insurance data.

Jessica Benedetto of Bradley Road addressed the committee regarding a Marblehead Current article about a Thought Exchange survey in which 340 residents participated. She argued the survey had significant selection bias, excluding busy working parents, and that using its results — in which transportation ranked 150 out of 172 priorities — to guide budget decisions was methodologically flawed. She noted she has requested busing for grades 7–12 for three years and lives 2.6 miles from the high school with no safe walking route.

Public comment included the following substantive remarks:

• Marblehead Beacon representative described filing repeated public records requests since July, ultimately appealing to the Secretary of State, and stated the town provided only a snapshot rather than the average daily balances and timeline requested. She noted that a Select Board member is president of National Grand Bank and argued that warranted public discussion.
• Sarah Fox, 46 Peach Tree (school committee context) urged the board to work expeditiously across all departments to present an override option to voters, warning that 1.3% revenue growth does not cover contractual obligations.
• Jen Schaffner, 20 Casino Road asked for clarity on the process: who decides what goes in an override, when will a level-funded budget be presented, and what is the Finance Committee’s role?
• Nancy (55 Commercial Street, online) offered historical perspective on the finance department going back to the 1980s, noted the town remained on a legacy system from 1977 well into the 2000s, and suggested zero-based budgeting and position control systems.
• Becca Whitten, 150 Atlantic Avenue (online) asked which accounts the Select Board has oversight over; Keyser answered: none—the treasurer has an independent statutory mandate.
• Jim Fall, 21 Chamber Avenue asked for the current interest rate at Eastern Bank and expressed frustration that no one could provide a simple answer.
• Megan Sweeney, 23 Beacon Street praised policy-and-procedure progress but urged the board to engage the press as a transparency partner and expressed concern about the February timeline for an override discussion.
• Brett Murray noted that with town meeting on May 1st, the board is already late, citing the school department override attempt the prior year that passed town meeting but failed at the ballot box.
• Mark Pelletier raised employee retention, noting concern about five-year plans given recent high staff turnover.
• Jim Ziston, Two Mile Road (corporator of a local bank and former housing authority treasurer) explained that Eastern Bank likely holds a large share because it manages municipal trust funds, which few banks do.
• Kathy Hempel, 9 Palmer Road recommended establishing a community communication plan using organizations like the League of Women Voters to explain override pros and cons.
• An unnamed resident flagged that the FY2022 CAFR has not been publicly released, and that its numbers may not match figures in the night’s presentation.

After the appointment, the chair opened the floor for public comment. No members of the public addressed either board. The School Committee adjourned first, followed by the Select Board at approximately 9:19 PM on a unanimous roll-call vote.

A resident participating online during public comment took issue with the board’s earlier discussion of Complete Streets, arguing that the program is a street design philosophy—covering pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and people with disabilities—not merely a grant funding stream. The resident expressed concern that meeting minutes went unrecorded for years and that the committee had not been maintained, characterizing it as the town making a commitment with its fingers crossed. No other public comments were offered.

Barbara (36 Chestnut Street), a retired Navy official, addressed the board. He described directing the Navy’s Campaign Drug Free program nationally and, after returning to Marblehead, restarting substance-abuse education efforts in 2016 at the request of local residents following an overdose death in his neighborhood. He is currently working with the regional DARE coordinator and has spoken with Marblehead High School administration and the town health director.

Key points raised:

• He cited an Essex County sheriff statistic that approximately 80% of jail inmates have substance-abuse histories.
• He questioned the board’s role in approving marijuana dispensaries in Marblehead, noting concerns about increased teen usage in states that have legalized cannabis.
• He argued substance-abuse education must begin in early elementary grades and be tiered through middle and high school.
• He offered himself as a certified resource to the board and the schools.
• District Attorney Paul Tucker’s interest in reinstating DARE was noted.

A board member (Tom McMahon, who had remained) added that purpose-driven activities and mentorship programs are as important as awareness campaigns in preventing substance abuse.

A board member read from an American Lung Association ‘Tobacco-Free 23’ campaign release, noting that 11.1% of Massachusetts residents smoke and tobacco use causes approximately 9,300 preventable deaths per year in the state. The member asked the board to add a formal discussion item to the next meeting’s agenda, potentially involving outreach to the high school, middle school, and Senior Center. The health director noted that the town already has a tobacco control grant through the state and a regional coordinator, Joyce Redford, who covers the North Shore from Marblehead to Gloucester. The director noted that Marblehead had enacted a tobacco-21 age restriction before the state did. The board agreed to invite Joyce Redford to the next meeting.

Resident Dan Albert of 58 Leeson Road addressed the board regarding a pedestrian struck on November 29 at the intersection of Bessom Street and Pleasant Street near Village Plaza at approximately 5:02 PM. Drawing from a police report and local news coverage, Albert described the circumstances: a driver turning left from Bessom Street onto Pleasant Street struck a pedestrian, Mary Pimentel, who was crossing outside a marked crosswalk. A second vehicle had stopped to allow the pedestrian to cross, which Albert suggested contributed to the driver’s failure to see her.

Albert made three specific requests:

1. Data escalation — Every police report involving a pedestrian, cyclist, or other vulnerable road user should be escalated to the Town Administrator and reported to the Select Board with follow-up on corrective action.
2. Street lighting coordination — The Marblehead Municipal Light Department (MMLD), which converted to LED streetlights approximately 15 years ago, should coordinate with relevant town departments to follow the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards for roadway illumination levels.
3. Cultural shift in policing — Albert argued that police reports in such incidents tend to focus on driver-favorable framing (noting the pedestrian’s dark clothing, absence from a crosswalk) without adequately assessing pedestrian injuries or rights, noting that state law does not require pedestrians to use crosswalks if none is within 300 feet.

The Town Administrator responded that pedestrian incidents are currently discussed with the police chief as patterns emerge, that a sidewalk and walkway condition study is underway (previously funded by the board), and that coordination with DPW Director Amy McHugh on crosswalk painting and bump-out projects is ongoing. He noted that completed bump-outs are awaiting fog-line painting to clarify road geometry for drivers.

Following the vote, the chair pro tem invited public comment. No public participants came forward and the agenda item was closed without comment.

Bonnie Grenier (17 Sagamore Road / League of Women Voters): Expressed concern that Senate Bill 3027 could languish in the legislature as a similar snow-emergency parking fine bill (Senate Bill 2288) has for over two years since a 2020 town meeting vote. She asked the board to use its influence to expedite the bill in time for the June 2023 town elections. The chair noted plans to meet with the state representative and would inquire directly.

Jim (Two Mile Road): Expressed support for a proposed sustainability/energy coordinator position, noting that similar positions in other towns pay for themselves through energy-savings partnerships. Also flagged the West Shore Drive bump-out as a hazard that has already caused vehicle damage.

Resident (Tello’s Road): Delivered a detailed presentation on traffic safety concerns on Rockaway Avenue and Rock Cliff Road. Key points:

• Over six months ago two young children were nearly struck by a vehicle at the Rockaway/Rock Cliff intersection
• Police collected a seven-day speed study showing an average speed of 15 mph on Rock Cliff Road; Chief King determined no intervention was warranted
• The resident questioned the study methodology, noting that 18% of the 651 recorded trips were motorcycles and that approximately 100 vehicles per day were using the 300-foot block
• Argued that the police are asked to shoulder traffic safety responsibilities that require cross-departmental coordination including engineering and planning
• Called for a public-facing, comprehensive traffic safety process allowing residents to submit concerns and track responses across departments
• Also requested that meeting recordings be more prominently posted on the town website alongside agendas and minutes

Catherine Wilmington, age 10 (46 Speed Street): Expressed concern about pedestrian safety at a bump-out between Pleasant Street and Village Street, noting tire marks in the grass and on the sidewalk.

Alan (online): Raised concerns about the Smith Street / Devereaux bump-out construction, citing the loss of approximately six parking spaces, a post office exit radius too tight for safe egress, trucks already driving over the corner, and uncertainty about snow removal. Also asked about the status of a long-promised ADA-compliance fix at the Beach Street and Atlantic Avenue intersection.

Resident 1 commented on the fuel station (noting it had appeared overdue for replacement) and raised the idea of a home-rule charter, citing Amesbury’s charter as a model with clear vacancy-filling procedures. He urged the Select Board to appoint an ad-hoc committee to explore the concept, noting many neighboring communities have adopted charters.

The chair responded that MGL Chapter 41 Section 11 is clear and prescriptive on vacancy procedures, though acknowledged the broader merits of the charter discussion.

Resident 2 (Dan) argued that the town’s Complete Streets policy (signed 2018) requires annual reporting in the Town Report of metrics such as miles of bicycle routes, new pedestrian accommodations, and curb ramps installed — reporting he said he cannot find in recent Town Reports. He contended that Complete Streets is a philosophical shift in street design that prioritizes pedestrians, cyclists, and wheelchair users equally with motor vehicles, not merely a state funding stream. He cited specific examples including the Smith Street rail trail crossing alignment and a requested crosswalk on Maple Street that was denied. He called for the Complete Streets Committee to become a standing committee rather than an ad-hoc body.

The chair opened the public comment period. No residents came forward to speak.

Dan Albert, 58 Lester Road: Raised a decade-old commitment to reduce the speed limit on Leggs Hill Road to 25 mph, tied to the YMCA construction. He noted that the existing 30 mph sign and a non-functional solar-powered advisory sign could be replaced with a school safety zone as originally promised. He urged the board to actively follow up with engineering firms (Tool Design and Stantec) rather than assume plans will be executed without oversight.

Sarah Fox: Urged the board, as future ARPA allocations are considered, to look at what other towns are doing to address learning loss and social-emotional outcomes in schools, and to use those as benchmarks for town-school partnerships with remaining ARPA funds.

During public comment, a board member suggested placing signs at the transfer station entrance and recycling area when new annual stickers become available (approximately the second week of December), noting that some users are unaware stickers are required.

A prior resident suggestion to check stickers on Saturdays was discussed; staff noted that dedicating one employee solely to sticker checks would leave other areas understaffed. Installation of cameras at the facility in the near future was mentioned as a way to free up staff time. The new automated gate system was also noted as a longer-term solution.

During the open public comment period, a resident named Jack stated that sticker enforcement at the transfer station gate — historically conducted by a gate attendant — is no longer occurring. He reported observing vehicles with out-of-town markings using the facility on multiple occasions in recent months. He suggested targeted overtime enforcement, particularly on busy Saturdays, to protect revenue and ensure the facility serves only Marblehead residents. A board member expressed agreement. No formal action was taken.

A resident (identified as Alan, 159 [street unclear]) stated that two of the Light Commission candidates had referenced reading meeting minutes to stay informed, then challenged the board’s response — via town counsel — that public comments not engaged by the board need not appear in the minutes. He argued this position constitutes censorship and asked the board to place a vote on the record regarding the letter sent in the board’s name by town counsel. The chair indicated the board would follow its legal counsel’s judgment.

A speaker identified as Jackie, affiliated with the town’s anti-hate coalition, reported that police had documented antisemitic and racist graffiti at the Recreation park building near Camp Shirley. She called on parents, churches, synagogues, and community organizations to address the behavior, noting that Chief King is also a coalition member and that police are working to identify perpetrators. A board member echoed the statement and called on communities of faith to respond.

During closing remarks, multiple board members commended the Marblehead Fire Department and neighboring-town mutual aid responders for their work at a recent transfer station fire. The chair also noted that public comment is available at all regular Select Board meetings at the chair’s discretion.

A spokesperson for Marblehead News Group described the organization’s mission: to provide objective, community-focused local journalism governed by a Marblehead-based board of directors rather than out-of-town corporations.

Key details shared:

• Platform: Currently online at marbleheadnews.org, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram; a free print edition is planned for broad distribution.
• Nonprofit status: Officially recognized as a 501(c)(3), enabling grant and donation funding in addition to advertising.
• Journalists: Doug Whynott (full-time editor), Chris Olsen (consulting editor, former Marblehead Reporter editor), and Lyn Bender (lead freelance writer).
• Board: Includes a former AP New England bureau chief and Virginia Buckingham, former CEO of Massport and former Chief of Staff to two Massachusetts Governors.

Board members expressed strong personal support for the initiative and encouraged residents to consider donating to the nonprofit.

A resident from Sheldon Road, identifying themselves as a member of the town’s housing production plan committee, stated they were unable to join the meeting virtually due to a technical failure at start time and expressed frustration that no after-hours contact existed to resolve the issue. The resident acknowledged this was not an open meeting violation but described it as disrespectful to residents interested in public business.

A second resident raised concerns about neighbors on Arnold Terrace feeling dismissed by characterizations of traffic impacts as a ‘minor inconvenience,’ and noted those residents had expressed feeling misled about the transfer station access road. The resident also raised a question about the facility sticker policy for board members.

Resident from 64 Roosevelt Avenue raised concerns about:

• The town administrator phone message still listing a former administrator who had left months earlier.
• Electronic speed/message signs placed in dangerous locations (Waterside Road, Pleasant Street, Vine Street) near crosswalks and tight traffic areas.
• Contractor vehicles parked without municipal license plates along public roads, including on Military Street near Hawthorne Road.
• Whether the e-plus IT contract covers all town departments (Water & Sewer, Electric Light, Schools, Harbor Master) or only general town government.

The Police Chief responded that sign placement is done carefully with Chief King, that contractor-owned signs on Pleasant Street are DOT-sized highway boards that were noted as oversized, and that smaller homeland-security-procured signs are available as a substitute. He confirmed the trailers would be registered.

Resident from 24 Longview Drive commented on capital project oversight following the override vote, recommending: separate budget buckets for roads vs. roofs, a prioritized list by department, and a standing building/roads committee to provide regular public updates and guard against inflation risk.

Resident from Longview Drive area (different speaker) spoke in support of the discussion about board diversity, describing encountering many newer residents interested in civic participation who lack existing connections to town networks, and suggesting a general five-year maximum term for volunteer board positions to create openings for new members.

Several members of the public addressed the board during and after the IT contract discussion and in new business:

IT Contract (Marco, IT specialist): Flagged end-of-life Fortinet hardware, unclear hardware ownership, recurring subscription costs for Nutanix/Cisco/Office 365, and the lack of in-house IT oversight.

IT Contract (Lina/Elena, Marblehead Beacon): Cited a December 2021 town audit that identified IT infrastructure concerns; questioned the absence of a service agreement before the vote and lack of measurable success metrics.

Harbors and Waters Board appointments (Jocelyn Cook): Asked why no new members had been appointed to the board since 2017 (Clark Smith) aside from one alternate in 2019, and asked whether a board member with ties to National Grand Bank would recuse himself given overlapping membership with the Harbors and Waters Board.

Volunteer appointment policy (board discussion): A board member proposed exploring written policies for volunteer board appointments based on best practices from other towns. Others expressed concern that formalizing an interview process would discourage existing volunteers.

Gas-powered leaf blower bylaw (board member): Clarified that the bylaw passed at town meeting must still be reviewed by the Attorney General’s office (21-day submission, 90-day review window) and that no fine structure was authorized by town meeting, making enforcement impossible this summer.

Two members of the public spoke during the public comment period:

Michael (resident, last name unclear from audio) asked the board to table the regulations, arguing:

• Setback requirements are too low for a densely populated town.
• The City of Beverly recently removed residents’ ability to keep fowl, citing public health concerns about germs and rodents.
• The regulation does not specify how many neighbors opposing an application would be sufficient to deny it.
• The regulation was not publicly disclosed in advance and the board had not yet evaluated materials submitted by neighbors weeks earlier.
• A permit violation could take up to a year to resolve, which he considered too long.

Alma (attorney for the Joyce family, 165 West Shore Drive) raised three questions:

1. The ‘chronic nuisance’ definition appears only in the definitions section with no corresponding enforcement mechanism described.
2. She suggested a pre-written sworn statement form be provided to applicants to streamline the application process.
3. She questioned whether Section 8(c)’s burden-of-proof requirement — that the applicant must demonstrate the permit will not be detrimental to public welfare — was appropriate, suggesting it could lead to inconsistent treatment of applicants depending on neighborhood dynamics, and that the burden might more appropriately rest on the town in a revocation context.

A resident identified as a retired marketing researcher raised several questions about the ARPA process:

1. Public forums: Asked why Marblehead had not held community forums while most Massachusetts communities already had. Board members responded that a full public presentation is planned and criteria are already posted on the town website.
2. Transparency complaint: Stated she had contacted the Secretary of the Commonwealth to obtain information about ARPA projects, which she felt was necessary because she could not get answers otherwise. Board members strongly disputed any lack of transparency and cited the transition in town administration as a factor in the pace.
3. Technology spending and the override: Asked why ARPA funds were not being used for the roughly $1.7 million in technology spending included in the override question, rather than using override revenue. A board member responded that much of the technology spending was on the school side and did not meet ARPA covid-impact criteria as defined by the working group.
4. Shell game concern: Asked for assurance that ARPA money would not be used to substitute for other spending. Board members rejected the framing as offensive and reiterated the structured, criteria-based process.

Board members acknowledged the resident’s research background and said the working group’s survey, criteria, and methodology would be publicly presented once fully constituted with the new Town Administrator.

Nine residents addressed the Committee, with the Committee’s policy this evening being that only the Superintendent would respond during the hearing itself. Several members later objected to that procedure; Gold ultimately closed the hearing and opened the SC discussion at 9:20 PM.

Resident concerns (in order)

Jerry O’Neil (18 Orchard Street):

• Asked who would lead HR decisions, employee training, and IT technology decisions given the eliminations
• Referenced “last year’s budget hearing” that suggested the override wait until FY21 and asked what override planning had been done
• Later: “we continued to be forced to do more with less” and asked for a strategic plan

Jeff St George (29 West Shore Drive) (facilities-management professional):

• Pressed on the $135,699 COVID line: planning for disinfecting (not merely cleaning), janitorial labor and supply costs, air quality of buildings prior to return
• “Concerned not enough labor and/or supply costs had been built in”

Catherine Martin (29 West Shore Drive):

• Asked whether $162,970 technology line could cover 2,800 students and 500 staff with hardware, software, and platform licensing for remote learning
• Asked about compensatory services for missed speech-language and other services in the Spring

Muffy Paquette (44A Cloutmans Lane):

• Asked for clarification on the $200,000 SPED prepayment — whether that amount comes back into the base budget when preparing the FY22 town allocation

Meredith Tedford (Locust St):

• Asked what went into the COVID expenditure line and whether it could be cut if not enough
• Said the presentation “had been tactical and not strategic” and hoped the committee would discuss overall philosophy

Erin Noonan (Beverly Ave) – later a Select Board chair:

• Asked for direct response from the committee (refused under the chair’s rules)
• Pressed on full Pre-K and Kindergarten tuition as a budget driver given COVID-19
• Asked about the influx of students returning from private schools if district stays full-remote
• Concerned about social-emotional needs of students reentering the district (Village has 2 guidance counselors for 700+ students — “very high case load”)
• Asked how the backlog of pending SPED evaluations would affect the budget
• Commended McAlduff on his constant honesty, referenced prior meetings where McAlduff said any further cuts would affect student services, and asked McAlduff to confirm; he did

Alastar Connor:

• Social-emotional health budget line; technology funding given many families may no longer afford their own; Coffin School air quality (HVAC, outdoor classrooms); school nurse involvement in budget process

Procedural drama

Sarah Fox stated that at a public hearing the public had the opportunity to interact with the elected officials. Chair Gold said that was not her understanding; McAlduff said it was allowable. Member David Harris recommended going through public questions without committee responding, “had never experienced the Committee responding to the public during the Budget Hearing.” Schaeffner noted several people had asked for the committee’s opinions. Gold’s procedure (committee silent through public hearing) held. Gold closed the public hearing at 9:20 PM.