← Home

Deep dive

Where has Marblehead's money gone?

Marblehead's general fund grew by $35.7 million over the last decade. Schools alone accounted for nearly half of that growth. Health insurance, public safety, debt service, and pensions each contributed similar smaller amounts.

Or skip the essay - explore every line item yourself.

Here are the five biggest year-over-year movers in the FY27 budget:

LineFunction$ change% change
Loading...

See all line items in the Town Budget tool ->

$70M→$106M
FY15 to FY26
48%
Schools share of growth
$32M→$46M
School spending, FY15–24
$7.0M
FY26 free cash used

The property tax levy doubled from $39M in 2005 to $82M in 2024. Here is where every additional dollar went, who has been checking the books, and what grew faster than it probably should have.

Where it went

Marblehead's General Fund spending grew from $70.5 million in 2015 to $106.2 million in 2026, an increase of $35.7 million. These are the town's budgetary-basis General Fund numbers: the money the Finance Committee builds the annual budget around and Town Meeting votes on. They exclude grants, school food service and athletics fees, and state on-behalf payments into the teachers pension fund, which together total roughly $26 million a year in additional money the town does not directly control.

Six categories account for all of that $35.7 million in growth.

Schools
Health insurance
Public safety
Debt payments
Pensions
Everything else
$0 $25M $50M $75M $100M actual expended / budget FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Schools Health ins. Public safety Debt Pensions Everything else

Schools drove nearly half of the $35.7 million in growth, adding $17.0 million (a 53 percent increase). Health insurance added $4.7 million (45 percent). Public safety added $3.9 million (54 percent). Debt payments added $3.8 million (70 percent). Pensions, measured on a budgetary basis, added $3.1 million (136 percent). The remaining $3.1 million came from "everything else", the catch-all bucket that includes public works, the library, the Council on Aging, state and county charges, and every other general fund line.

Share of FY26 spending

Of every dollar Marblehead's General Fund spent in FY26, about 46 cents went to schools. Health insurance was 14 cents, public safety 11, debt payments 9, and pensions 5. The remaining 15 cents covered "everything else": public works, the library, the Council on Aging, state and county charges, and every other line.

Schools $49.1M
Health insurance $15.1M
Public safety $11.2M
Debt payments $9.4M
Pensions $5.4M
Everything else $16.0M

FY26 General Fund of $106.2 million, same six categories and budgetary basis as the chart above. Source: FY27 Proposed Budget, FY26 Budget column.

Schools is the biggest dollar pull, so it is worth unpacking. From 2015 to 2024, the most recent year with closed-book actuals, the schools line grew from $32.1 million to $46.2 million in nominal dollars. After inflation (the consumer price index rose about 31 percent over the same window), the picture changes:

Enrollment
-19%3,245 to 2,617 students
Per-pupil spending
+18%$13,504 to $20,743, after inflation
Total school spending
+10%$32.1M to $46.2M, after inflation
Classroom teachers
-4%256.8 to 245.8 positions

Decreases extend left from the center line, increases extend right. Scaled so enrollment's 19 percent drop fills the full left half. Per-pupil spending is the state Department of Education's standard comparison metric.

About 9 percent of the FY2026 school budget, roughly $4.6 million, pays for out-of-district special education placements that are mandated by federal and state law.

Department by department, 2015 vs 2026

Every general fund line item in the town's budget, ranked by absolute dollar change. Rows at the top drove the most change in either direction. Health insurance, pensions, and debt service are shown in the chart above and are not repeated here.

Dollar amounts in thousands
Department FY 15 FY 26 $ Chg % Chg
Schools (total appropriation) $32,066 $49,120 +$17,054 +53%
Fire $3,309 $5,561 +$2,252 +68%
Police $3,372 $4,987 +$1,616 +48%
Waste $1,826 $2,943 +$1,117 +61%
Public Works $1,305 $2,301 +$996 +76%
Finance $848 $1,689 +$841 +99%
Snow and Ice $798 $105 -$693 -87% (note E)
Insurance Premiums $318 $865 +$547 +172% (note F)
Library $999 $1,493 +$494 +49%
Community Development $1 $494 +$493 see note A
Reserve Fund $0 $444 +$444 see note B
Rec and Park $726 $1,037 +$311 +43%
Human Resources $0 $295 +$295 see note C
Select Board $456 $700 +$244 +53%
Inspections $450 $689 +$240 +53%
Cemetery $313 $495 +$182 +58%
Council on Aging $243 $423 +$180 +74%
Town Counsel $71 $228 +$157 +219% (note F)
Health $211 $326 +$115 +55%
Public Buildings $189 $287 +$98 +52%
Town Clerk $171 $245 +$74 +43%
Veterans $94 $149 +$55 +58%
Intergovernmental State and County $2,706 not directly comparable see note D see note D
  1. Community Development did not exist as a department in 2015; the closest match was Planning Board Expense at $967. Most of the $493,000 increase is function migration, not net new spending.
  2. Reserve Fund is a contingency appropriation. FY15 actual was $0 because it transfers to other lines when used.
  3. Human Resources did not exist as a separate department in 2015; those functions were inside the Select Board office.
  4. Intergovernmental State and County charges were an explicit line in the FY15 budget ($2,706,000) but are now treated as net deductions from state aid on the cherry-sheet revenue side, so there is no directly comparable FY26 appropriation line. 1 2
  5. Snow and Ice dropped because FY15 was a record snow year that blew past its $100,000 original budget and required supplemental appropriations; FY26 is a more typical baseline, not a cut in plowing.
  6. The Town Counsel and Insurance Premiums FY26 figures come from the FY26 budget summary, which reports $228,000 and $865,000 respectively. The FY27 Proposed Budget's own FY26 budget column reports different values for these two lines ($115,000 for Town Counsel and $964,554 for Insurance Premiums). The reason for the discrepancies is not publicly documented. Prose that cites these rows should hedge accordingly. 1 2

Who has been checking the books

Six independent reviewers check the town's finances every year.

Marblehead's finances have been independently reviewed every year going back to at least 2001. What follows is a plain-language list of the outside reviewers who check the town's books, what each review actually looks at, and where to read their findings.

Independent annual audit

An outside accounting firm audits the town's books every year and publishes its opinion in the town's annual financial report. The auditor confirms whether the financial statements fairly present the town's position under generally accepted accounting principles. Marblehead has received a clean audit opinion for the full period covered by the chart and table above.

Source: the town's annual financial reports are published on marbleheadma.gov and covered years from 2001 forward are on file with the Town Accountant.

State Department of Revenue tax rate certification

Before Marblehead can set a tax rate each year, the state Department of Revenue reviews the town's books and certifies that the proposed levy complies with state law, including the Proposition 2.5 cap. The state has certified the town's tax rate every year. The certification is a hard legal gate: without it, the town cannot send out tax bills.

Source: annual tax rate recapitulations filed by the town and certified by the state Department of Revenue's Division of Local Services; each year's certification is summarized in the town's annual financial report.

State pension regulator actuarial review

The state regulator for public employee retirement systems commissions an independent actuarial valuation of Marblehead's pension fund every two years. The valuation measures the fund's assets, liabilities, and funded ratio, and sets the required annual contribution the town must pay into the system. The 2024 valuation puts Marblehead on a funding schedule with the total pension appropriation rising 8.6 percent each year through FY2035 and a final amortization payment in FY2036.

Source: biennial actuarial valuations published by the state Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission; valuations dated 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024 are the most recent.

Finance Committee reports

The Marblehead Finance Committee publishes an annual report reviewing the town's proposed budget before Town Meeting votes on it. The Committee has repeatedly warned that the town's reliance on leftover surplus from prior years, known by the state's term "free cash," to balance the operating budget is not sustainable. Their 2025 report put it directly:

"The Town continues to use a significant portion of available Free Cash to balance the budget while upholding reserves equivalent to only 2.5 percent of the operating budget. This amount falls short of the state's recommended range of 5 to 10 percent."

Marblehead Finance Committee, 2025 Annual Report. PDF.

Recent Town Meetings have appropriated free cash into the operating budget every year, including roughly $10.2 million in fiscal year 2023, $5.5 million in fiscal year 2025, and $7.0 million in fiscal year 2026.

Source: annual Finance Committee reports published on marbleheadma.gov; reports from 2016, 2019, 2021, 2022, 2025, and 2026 are the ones most directly relevant to the period shown above.

Auditor management letters

Separately from the annual audit opinion, the outside auditor writes a management letter to town officials flagging control, process, or reporting issues that do not rise to the level of a qualified audit opinion but that the auditor wants on the record. These letters are published and are the place to look for early warning signs, including comments on internal controls, segregation of duties, and reconciliation practices.

Source: management letters issued by the town's outside auditor for fiscal years 2022 and 2023, on file with the Town Accountant and published with the annual financial reports on marbleheadma.gov.

Town Meeting

Every line of the operating budget is voted on at Town Meeting. Residents can attend, debate, amend, and vote on each appropriation before it passes. Town Meeting is itself an oversight mechanism: no general fund dollar gets spent without this vote. The annual Town Warrant, published before each Town Meeting, lists every article and every appropriation voters are being asked to approve.

Source: the annual Town Warrant and Town Meeting minutes, published by the Town Clerk on marbleheadma.gov.

These reviewers do not all agree the town is doing everything right. The Finance Committee has specifically flagged the town's reliance on leftover surplus from prior years to balance the operating budget as a pattern that cannot continue indefinitely, and the next section lists the specific lines that have grown faster than enrollment, inflation, or headcount would explain, including that pattern.

What grew faster

Four specific budget lines grew faster than enrollment, inflation, or headcount would explain.

Four specific lines in the town's budget have grown faster than enrollment, inflation, or headcount would explain. Each is documented below with its primary sources.

School staffing: three measures, three stories

Between 2015 and 2024, Marblehead's enrollment fell from 3,245 students to 2,617, a drop of 628 students or 19 percent. Over the same window, the town's annual financial reports (ACFR) show total education FTE rising from 490 to 537, a 9.6 percent increase. But the state Department of Education (DESE), which tracks staff reported by the schools directly, shows a different picture: total educator FTE fell from 501.8 to 431.8 (down 13.9 percent) and classroom teacher FTE fell from 256.8 to 245.7 (down 4.3 percent). The ACFR diverges from DESE primarily because of a FY23 reporting change (Town payroll rosters show school headcount went from 705 in FY22 to 699 in FY23, and the current school finance office and CFO, asked in 2026, characterized the ACFR's +54 figure as a reporting error by the previous administrations) and because it uses a broader definition of "education staff." Marblehead's student-to-teacher ratio went from 12.6 to 10.7 over the period, the lowest of its four peer towns (Stoneham 10.8, Swampscott 11.1, Melrose 13.7). See all three measures charted side by side.

About 9 percent of the FY2026 school budget, roughly $4.6 million, pays for out-of-district special education placements. These tuitions and transportation costs are mandated by the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and by state special education law; the town does not have discretion to stop paying for the actual placements once a student's Individualized Education Program requires them.

The FY2027 no-override budget shows the out-of-district special education tuition appropriation reduced by $1.5 million. The town explained the mechanism at the April 8, 2026 Select Board meeting: "In FY27, we reduced our Special Education Out of District Tuition Budget by $1,500,000 due to the utilization of surplus FY26 Funds. We will need to have this restored in FY28 (and beyond) to meet IEP obligations." The reduction is to the appropriated budget line, not to the actual placements: the town plans to cover $1.5 million of the FY27 cost from leftover FY26 surplus (free cash) rather than from fresh FY27 appropriations. Because that surplus does not recur, Tier 1 of the override includes a $1.5 million per year restoration of this line in FY28 and FY29.

Source: state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education enrollment and classroom teacher data; the town's full-time-equivalent staffing rollup; the FY2026 budget summary for out-of-district special education sub-lines; and the Town Administrator's April 8, 2026 override presentation, "Override Details – Schools" slide (Tier 1 Restore), for the $1.5 million FY27 reduction mechanism and the FY28/FY29 restoration. Also covered in Will Dowd, "Kezer, Benjamin present $9M-to-$15M tiered override plan," Marblehead Independent, April 8, 2026.

Inside school staffing breaks down what those 430 positions actually are, which are legally mandated, and how Marblehead compares to peer towns by role category.

Town Counsel up 142 percent between FY2026 and FY2027

In the FY2027 Proposed Budget, Town Counsel rises from $115,000 (listed as the FY2026 budget in that document) to $278,000, a one-year increase of $163,000 or 142 percent. The expense sub-line alone grows from $113,000 to $276,000 (the $2,000 salary line is unchanged). The two FY2026 town documents disagree on this line: the FY2027 Proposed Budget shows $115,000, while the FY2026 Town Meeting appropriation records $228,000. The FY2027 figure of $278,000 is $50,000 above the Town Meeting number and $163,000 above the Proposed Budget number. Neither the FY27 Proposed Budget nor the 2026 Finance Committee Report explains the increase or the discrepancy between the two FY26 figures.

Source: FY2027 Proposed Budget (items 29 and 30, Town Counsel) for the FY27 figure of $278,000 and the FY26 Budget column of $115,000; the FY2026 budget summary for the $228,000 Town Meeting appropriation. The reason for the year-over-year increase and for the discrepancy between the two FY26 figures is not explained in publicly available documents.

Retiree benefits trust contribution zeroed out in the no-override budget

The FY2026 budget transferred $250,000 into the town's retiree benefits trust, a fund the town set up to pre-pay future retiree health benefits. The FY2027 Proposed Budget transfers $0, a reduction of $250,000 or 100 percent. The underlying long-term liability continues to accrue whether or not the annual contribution is made.

Source: FY2026 budget summary (Other Post Employment Benefits transfer line at $250,000) and FY2027 Proposed Budget page 4, item 226 (same line, $0 for FY2027, marked as a 100 percent reduction).

Free cash used to balance the operating budget

Marblehead has used "free cash" (the state's term for prior-year surplus certified each fall by the Department of Revenue) to balance its operating budget for several years in a row. At Town Meeting, voters appropriated $7,000,000 of free cash into the FY2026 operating budget, up from $5,500,000 in FY2025 and $10,200,000 in FY2023. The Finance Committee's 2025 annual report stated that "the Town continues to use a significant portion of available Free Cash to balance the budget while upholding reserves equivalent to only 2.5 percent of the operating budget. This amount falls short of the state's recommended range of 5 to 10 percent." The 2022 Finance Committee report described the town's situation as a "structural budget challenge" caused by "recurring costs structurally outpacing recurring revenues." Free cash is certified annually from the prior year's unspent surplus; the amount available in any given year depends on the prior year's results.

Source: Finance Committee annual reports for 2025 (the free cash warning quoted above) and 2022 (the "structural budget challenge" framing); Town Meeting approved free cash appropriations for FY2023 (Article 29, $10.2 million), FY2025 (Article 19, $5.5 million), and FY2026 (Article 18, $7.0 million); and the 2026 State of the Town presentation for the FY2025 through FY2027 projected free cash usage.

What this means for the override

The record shows two things worth taking seriously. Most of Marblehead's $35.7 million in General Fund spending growth since 2015 went to schools (which kept a smaller student-to-teacher ratio than its peer towns while paying for mandated out-of-district special education placements), to health insurance (set by the state insurance pool, not by the town), and to pensions and debt payments (both on fixed schedules set outside the annual budget). Independent auditors have issued a clean opinion on the books every year, and the state has certified the town's tax rate every year. Separately, the Finance Committee has flagged, in multiple annual reports, that the town has been balancing the operating budget by drawing down leftover surplus from prior years, a pattern the Committee describes as a structural budget challenge.

What this means for the FY2027 override is a judgment each voter gets to make.

Sources and methodology

The stacked spending chart and the FY2015 vs FY2026 prose in the first section are built from the town's independent annual financial reports, specifically the "Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Budget and Actual, General Fund" for fiscal years 2015 through 2024. FY2025 expended actuals and FY2026 approved budget figures come from the FY2027 Proposed Budget published in April 2026. The chart uses budgetary-basis General Fund data throughout, which is the money the Finance Committee builds the annual budget around and Town Meeting votes on. It deliberately excludes grants, school food service and athletics fees, and state on-behalf payments into the teachers pension fund, because the page is trying to show what the town chose to spend out of its own General Fund, not total activity across every fund.

The department-by-department table in the first section uses FY2015 actual expended from the FY15 annual financial report (pages 76 to 78) and FY2026 budgeted figures from the town's FY2026 budget summary, cross-checked against the FY2027 Proposed Budget's FY2026 Budget column. Departments that did not exist in FY2015, or whose functions were consolidated or split after FY2015, are documented in notes A through F under the table.

The schools deep dive uses enrollment and classroom teacher counts published by the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE EPIMS data via educationtocareer.data.mass.gov), total education staffing from both the town's own ACFR full-time-equivalent employee rollup and DESE total educator FTE, per-pupil spending from the state's standard comparison metric, inflation adjustments from the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index for all urban consumers, and out-of-district special education line items from the FY2026 budget summary. Three staffing measures (ACFR education FTE, DESE total educator FTE, and DESE classroom teacher FTE) are presented because they tell different stories.

The "Who has been checking the books" section draws on six outside reviewers: the town's independent annual financial audits, state Department of Revenue tax rate certifications, biennial actuarial valuations published by the state public employee retirement regulator, Marblehead Finance Committee annual reports (the 2016, 2019, 2021, 2022, 2025, and 2026 reports are the ones most directly relevant to the period shown on this page), management letters issued by the town's outside auditor for fiscal years 2022 and 2023, and the annual Town Warrant and Town Meeting minutes published by the Town Clerk.

The "What grew faster" section cites each primary source in line on each card. The school staffing card uses the state Department of Education peer teachers and enrollment file, the town's full-time-equivalent rollup, the FY2026 budget summary for out-of-district special education sub-lines, and the override school items schedule. The Town Counsel card and the retiree benefits trust card both use the FY2027 Proposed Budget (specifically pages 1 and 4) and the FY2026 budget summary. The free cash card uses the 2022, 2025, and 2026 Finance Committee reports, the corresponding Town Meeting articles, and the 2026 State of the Town presentation.

The Town Counsel row in the department table and the Town Counsel card in the last section both note that two town documents report different FY2026 figures for that line. The FY2026 budget summary reports $228,000 (the Town Meeting appropriation) while the FY2027 Proposed Budget's own FY2026 Budget column reports $115,000. The reason for the inconsistency is not publicly documented. This is an actual disagreement between two primary sources, not a data entry error on this page.

The full research and methodology for this page, including every cell-level source citation and the basis choices described above, is recorded in the implementation plan under docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-10-spending-story-implementation.md. That document is the reference if you want to verify any figure on this page against its original source.

This page was built in April 2026. The rest of marbleheaddata.org updates on the same cadence as the underlying source documents; when the next annual financial report, Finance Committee report, or State of the Town presentation is published, the figures on this page will be rechecked and updated to match.